Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T17:59:09.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Control in Soybean (Glycine max) With Acifluorfen, Chlorimuron, and Thiameturon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James D. Jones ,
Billy J. Gossett ,
James R. Harris  and
Joe E. Toler
James D. Jones
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., and Instr., Exp. Stat. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359
Billy J. Gossett
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., and Instr., Exp. Stat. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359
James R. Harris
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., and Instr., Exp. Stat. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359
Joe E. Toler
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., and Instr., Exp. Stat. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Acifluorfen, chlorimuron, and thiameturon were compared in single and sequential treatments for cowpea control in soybean. Chlorimuron applied once at 8.8 g ai/ha at 14, 21, and 28 days after cowpea emergence controlled 80% or more of cowpea. Control was greater at 14 and 21 than at 28 days after emergence in one of three experiments. Cowpea control by chlorimuron was similar with single and sequential treatments. Soybean injury was lower, and soybean seed yields generally were higher with chlorimuron than with thiameturon or acifluorfen. Thiameturon and acifluorfen controlled less than 60% of cowpea. Three weedy cowpea cultivars responded the same to chlorimuron, but cowpea recovery was substantial in 1 of 3 yr.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidchlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidthiameturon, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidcowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp. ♯3 VIGSIsoybean, Glycine max (L.)Merr. ‘Deltapine 105’Sequential herbicide applicationsweed growth stages
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 518 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akobundu, I. O. 1982. Weed control in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in the humid tropics. Weed Sci. 30:331–334.Google Scholar
2. Amuti, K. S., Claus, J. S., and Maxcy, F. B. 1987. DPX-M6316: Postemergence herbicide for soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 42:45.Google Scholar
3. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylurea herbicides. p. 180 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Brown, J. F., and Swingle, H. D. 1976. Chemical control of cockleburs in lima beans and southern peas. Term. Farm Home Sci. 97:29–31.Google Scholar
5. Burgis, D. S. 1966. Evaluation of herbicides on southern peas. Weeds 14:180–181.Google Scholar
6. Claus, J. S. 1987. Chlorimuron-ethyl (Classic)®: A new broadleaf postemergence herbicide in soybean. Weed Technol. 1:114–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Crowder, S. H., Edwards, M. T., and Gillham, L. B. 1985. Classic® herbicide – a new alternative for southern soybean weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:78.Google Scholar
8. Culbertson, D. L., Frans, R. E., and Oliver, L. R. 1987. The efficacy of chlorimuron as influenced by application rate and stage of growth. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:93.Google Scholar
9. Elmore, C. D. 1986. Weed survey–southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:136–158.Google Scholar
10. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.)Merrill. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.Google Scholar
11. Feist, D. A., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1986. Adjuvants with DPX-M6316 in wheat and soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:58.Google Scholar
12. Harrison, H. F. Jr. 1988. Metribuzin tolerance within the genus Vigna . Weed Technol. 2:59–63.Google Scholar
13. Long, J. D., Amuti, K. S., Green, J. M., and Forney, D. R. 1988. DPX-M6316 – a new postemergence herbicide for soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:326.Google Scholar
14. Martin, J. H., Leonard, W. H., and Stamp, D. L. 1976. Cowpeas. p. 714–721 in Principles of Field Crop Production, 3rd ed. Macmillan Publ. Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
15. Murphy, T. R., and Gossett, B. J. 1984. Control of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in soybean (Glycine max) with acifluorfen. Weed Sci. 32:427–431.Google Scholar
16. Ogle, W. L. 1966. An evaluation of herbicides for southern peas and snap beans. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 90:290–295.Google Scholar
17. Piper, C. V. 1912. Agricultural varieties of the cowpea and immediately related species. USDA Bur. Plant Industry Bull. 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilson, H. K., and Myers, W. M. 1954. Large seeded legumes grown primarily for seed. p. 326–349 in Wilson, H. K. and Myers, W. M., Field Crop Production. J. B. Lippincott Company, New York.Google Scholar
19. WSSA Herbicide Handbook Committee. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar