Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:57:15.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Volunteer Sethoxydim-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bryan G. Young  and
Stephen E. Hart
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Crop Sciences Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Stephen E. Hart
Affiliation:
Crop Sciences Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted in 1995 and 1996 to determine the potential for commonly used volunteer corn herbicides to control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant (SR) corn in soybean. Greenhouse studies showed that the SR corn hybrid tolerated 181 times more sethoxydim than the susceptible sister hybrid. SR corn also tolerated other acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors including fluazifop-P, quizalofop-P, and clethodim with 30 X, 27 X, and 7 × magnitudes of tolerance, respectively, compared with the susceptible hybrid. SR corn exhibited the least tolerance to clethodim, with a control rating of 50% (CR50) predicted at 28 g ai/ha. Field studies at Dekalb and Urbana, IL, showed that quizalofop-P, fluazifop-P, and fluazifop-P plus fenoxaprop at 62, 140, and 140 + 47 g ai/ha, respectively, controlled 22% or less of volunteer F2 SR corn at 30 days after treatment (DAT). Clethodim at 105, 140, and 210 g/ha consistently suppressed 23 to 70% of the volunteer SR corn. Dry weight reductions at 60 DAT showed the same general trend as the visual estimates of control. The field results confirmed the greenhouse data, which suggested SR corn had the least amount of cross-resistance to clethodim compared to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides. In 1996, only AC 299,263 and imazethapyr plus imazaquin suppressed volunteer SR corn and prevented soybean yield loss at both locations. However, no system completely controlled volunteer SR corn.

Keywords

fenoxaprop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.volunteer corn, Zea mays L.Sethoxydim resistanceACCase, acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylaseALS, acetolactate synthaseCR50, herbicide rate needed to obtain 50% control ratingDAT, days after treatmentEPOST, early postemergencefb, followed byLPOST, late postemergencePOST, postemergenceSR, sethoxydim-resistant
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 649 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, R. N. 1976. Control of volunteer corn and giant foxtail in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. N., Ford, J. H., and Lueschen, W. E. 1982. Controlling volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans (Glycine max) with diclofop and glyphosate. Weed Sci. 30:132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. N. and Geadelmann, J. L. 1982. The effect of parentage on the control of volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, T. H. and Stoller, E. W. 1988. Volunteer corn (Zea mays) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, T. H., Stoller, E. W., and Bode, L. E. 1992. Quizalofop and sethoxydim activity as affected by adjuvants and ammonium fertilizers, Weed Sci. 40:12–19.Google Scholar
Dale, J. E. 1981. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:708–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotray, P. A., DiTomaso, J. M., Gronwald, J. W., Wyse, D. L., and Kochian, L. V. 1993a. Effects of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors on root cell transmembrane electric potentials in graminicide-tolerant and - susceptible corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol. 103:919–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dotray, P. A., Marshall, L. C., Parker, W. B., Wyse, D. L., Somers, D. A., and Gengenback, B. G. 1993b. Herbicide tolerance and weed control in sethoxydim-tolerant corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 41:213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. G., Williams, B. J., and Langton, S. J. 1996. Weed management systems using sethoxydim-tolerant field corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:3.Google Scholar
Parker, W. B., Marshall, L. C., Burton, J. D., Somers, D. A., Wyse, D. L., Gronwald, J. W., and Gengenback, B. G. 1990. Dominant mutations causing alterations in acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confer tolerance to cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:7175–7179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., and Benson, G. O. 1997. How a corn plant develops. Special Rep. No. 48. Iowa State Univ. Coop. Ext. Ser., Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Maxwell, D. J. 1995. Postemergence weed control systems for sethoxydim resistant corn. Urbana, Illinois, 1995. Research Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:210–211.Google Scholar