Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:45:04.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

David J. Brunton Open the ORCID record for David J. Brunton [Opens in a new window] ,
Peter Boutsalis ,
Gurjeet Gill  and
Christopher Preston
David J. Brunton*
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia
Peter Boutsalis
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia
Gurjeet Gill
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia
Christopher Preston
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia
*
Author for correspondence: David Brunton, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia, 5064. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during 2018 at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia, to identify effective herbicide options for the control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass in wheat. Dose–response experiments confirmed resistance in both field populations (T1 and A18) of rigid ryegrass to triallate, prosulfocarb, trifluralin, and pyroxasulfone. T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4. The level of resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively. Despite resistance, the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only. Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S-metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha–1). Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha-1) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively. These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated.

Keywords

David Johnson, Corteva AgriscienceProsulfocarbtriallatepyroxasulfoneS-metolachlortrifluralinglyphosaterigid ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin LOLRIwheatTriticum aestivum L. ‘Chief CL Plus’Thiocarbamatesherbicide resistancepreplant incorporatedweed seed set controlweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 19 - 24
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckie, HJ, Warwick, SI, Sauder, CA (2012) Basis for herbicide resistance in Canadian populations of wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci 60:10–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco‐Moreno, J, Chamorro, L, Masalles, R, Recasens, J, Sans, F (2004) Spatial distribution of Lolium rigidum seedlings following seed dispersal by combine harvesters. Weed Res 44:375–387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borger, C, Riethmuller, G, D’Antuono, M (2016) Eleven years of integrated weed management: long‐term impacts of row spacing and harvest weed seed destruction on Lolium rigidum control. Weed Res 56:359–366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutsalis, P, Gill, GS, Preston, C (2012) Incidence of herbicide resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) across southeastern Australia. Weed Technol 26:391–398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutsalis, P, Gill, GS, Preston, C (2014) Control of rigid ryegrass in Australian wheat production with pyroxasulfone. Weed Technol 28:332–339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunton, DJ, Boutsalis, P, Gill, G, Preston, C (2018) Resistance to multiple PRE herbicides in a field-evolved rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) population. Weed Sci 66:581–585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuerst, EP (1987) Understanding the mode of action of the chloroacetamide and thiocarbamate herbicides. Weed Technol 1:270–277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, GS (1996) Why annual ryegrass is a problem in Australian agriculture. Plant Prot Q 11:193–195 Google Scholar
Goggin, DE, Powles, SB, Steadman, KJ (2012) Understanding Lolium rigidum seeds: the key to managing a problem weed? Agron Sustain Dev 2:222–239 Google Scholar
Heap, I, Knight, R (1986) The occurrence of herbicide cross-resistance in a population of annual ryegrass, Lolium rigidum, resistant to diclofop-methyl. Aust J Agric Res 37:149–156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshtkar, E, Mathiassen, SK, Moss, SR, Kudsk, P (2015) Resistance profile of herbicide-resistant Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass) populations in Denmark. Crop Prot 69:83–89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleemann, SG, Desbiolles, J, Preston, C, Gill, GS (2014) Influence of disc seeding systems on pre-emergence herbicide control of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat. Pages 304–307 in Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Weeds Conference, Hobart. Hobart, Australia: Tasmanian Weed SocietyGoogle Scholar
Kleemann, SG, Preston, C, Gill, GS (2016) Influence of management on long-term seedbank dynamics of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in cropping systems of southern Australia. Weed Sci 64:303–311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangin, AR, Hall, LM, Schoenau, JJ, Beckie, HJ (2017) Influence of tillage on control of wild oat (Avena fatua) by the soil-applied herbicide pyroxasulfone. Weed Sci 65:266–274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, M, Gill, G (1987) Competition between crops and weeds in southern Australia. Plant Prot Q 2:86–96 Google Scholar
Preston, C (2014) Understanding pre-emergent cereal herbicides. Pages 65–67 in Proceedings of Grains Research and Development Corporation Update. GRDC code: UA00113, UA00134, UA00144. Adelaide, Australia: Grains Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Ritz, C, Kniss, AR, Streibig, JC (2015) Research methods in weed science: statistics. Weed Sci 63:166–187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, RK, Kleemann, SGL, Preston, C, Gill, GS (2015) Control of clethodim-resistant Lolium rigidum (rigid ryegrass) in triazine-tolerant canola (Brassica napus L.) in southern Australia. Crop Prot 78:99–105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, RK, Kleemann, SGL, Preston, C, Gill, GS (2017) Alternative herbicides for the management of clethodim-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in southern Australia. Weed Technol 29:578–586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakuma, M (1998) Probit analysis of preference data. Appl Entomol Zool 33:339–347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, VN, Elias, SG, Gadotti, GI, Garay, AE, Villela, FA (2016) Can the tetrazolium test be used as an alternative to the germination test in determining seed viability of grass species? Crop Sci 56:707–715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A (1971) Effects of soil moisture content on the availability of soil-applied herbicides to plants. Pestic Sci 2:56–59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Fowler, TM, Crowe, B, Ambe, T, Powles, SB (2011) The potential for pyroxasulfone to selectively control resistant and susceptible rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) biotypes in Australian grain crop production systems. Weed Technol 25:30–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2007) Management strategies for herbicide-resistant weed populations in Australian dryland crop production systems. Weed Technol 21:332–338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar