Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:01:50.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Annual Broadleaf Weeds in Pinto Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Rudy Esau
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to identify herbicides suitable for improved control of hairy nightshade, redroot pigweed, and common lambsquarters in pinto beans. Fomesafen at 0.25 kg ai ha-1 did not adequately control these weeds. Clomazone at 0.5 kg ai ha-1 controlled common lambsquarters but only suppressed the growth of redroot pigweed and hairy nightshade. Ethalfluralin at 0.84 to 1.1 kg ai ha-1 gave excellent initial control of these weeds but did not control later flushes of hairy nightshade. Imazethapyr applied PPI or POST at 50 to 75 g ai ha-1 controlled hairy nightshade, redroot pigweed, and common lambsquarters throughout the growing season. Imazethapyr combined with ethalfluralin gave superior weed control and resulted in greater yields than the most commonly used herbicides in pinto beans in western Canada.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1990. Guide to crop protection in Alberta. Agdex 606-1, 7000-113 St., Edmonton, AB T6H 5T6. p. 1694.Google Scholar
2. Bassett, I. J., and Munro, D. B. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 67. Solanum ptycanthum Dun., S. nigrum L., and 5. sarrachoides Sendt. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:401414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Binning, L. K., Hughes, R. L., and Michaelis, B. A. 1988. Control of annual weeds in snapbean. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 45:2932.Google Scholar
4. Blackshaw, R. E. 1990. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) interference in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 39:4853.Google Scholar
5. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cole, T. A., Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Behavior of imazethapyr in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:639644.Google Scholar
7. Harvey, R. G., and Albright, J. W. 1988. Red kidney bean weed control study. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 45:128.Google Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G., Morton, C. A., and Albright, J. A. 1988. Soybean herbicide study. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 45: 162167.Google Scholar
9. Miller, S. D., Dalrymple, A. W., and Ball, D. A. 1989. Evaluation of preplant incorporated and complementary preplant incorporated/preemergence or postemergence treatments in pinto beans. West. Weed Soc. Res. Prog. Rep., p. 263264.Google Scholar
10. Mills, J. A., and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353359.Google Scholar
11. Moyer, J. R., and Boswall, A. L. 1989. Effect of residues from 1988 applications of imazamethabenz and imazethapyr on several crops. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sec.), p. 274.Google Scholar
12. Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1986. Variation in response of four nightshades (Solanum spp.) to herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:765772.Google Scholar
13. Ogg, A. G., and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:2558.Google Scholar
14. Parker, C., and Fryer, J. D. 1975. Weed control problems causing major reductions in world food supplies. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 23:8395.Google Scholar
15. Quakenbush, L. S., and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 32: 529533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Renner, K. A., and Powell, G. E. 1988. Dry edible bean tolerance to postemergence herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 43: 36.Google Scholar
17. Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
18. Vencill, W. K., Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., and Hatzios, K. K. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and rotational crop response to imazethapyr in pea (Pisum sativum) and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 4:3943.Google Scholar
19. Wall, D. A. 1989. Control of wild mustard and redroot pigweed in navy beans. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sect.), p. 337338.Google Scholar
20. Werling, V. L., and Buhler, D. A. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36: 629635.Google Scholar
21. Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3: 678685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Wilson, R. G. Jr., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1980. Weed control in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in western Nebraska. 28:295299.Google Scholar
23. Wyse, D. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Factors affecting EPTC injury to navy beans. Weed Sci. 24:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-crop competition. International Plant Protection Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. p. 7374.Google Scholar