Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:23:56.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confirmation and Control of Propanil-Resistant and Quinclorac-Resistant Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mayank S. Malik ,
Nilda R. Burgos  and
Ronald E. Talbert
Mayank S. Malik*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Nilda R. Burgos
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intensive selection pressure from repeated use of propanil and quinclorac led to the evolution of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass biotypes. Twenty-two composite field samples were tested for level of resistance in 2002 and 2003, and field studies were conducted at the Rice Research and Extension Center, Stuttgart, AR, in 2002 and 2003 to evaluate alternative rice herbicides to control propanil-resistant (PR) and quinclorac-resistant (QR) barnyardgrass. Of the 22 composite samples, four were PR (30 to 40% control); four had a mixed population of PR, QR, and susceptible (S) barnyardgrass; and two had multiple resistance to propanil and quinclorac (P/QR), with control from propanil of 15 to 30% and control from quinclorac of 5 to 10%. ‘Wells’ rice was used where conventional herbicide programs were evaluated, and Clearfield rice ‘CL-161’ (imidazolinone-resistant) was used for herbicide programs involving imazethapyr. All PR and QR barnyardgrass were controlled > 90% by alternative herbicides, including all preemergence (PRE) and delayed preemergence (DPRE) treatments. By 56 d after emergence (DAE), cyhalofop or fenoxaprop applied to two- to three-leaf barnyardgrass (early postemergence [EPOST]), followed by (fb) a preflood application, controlled barnyardgrass > 93%. Pendimethalin controlled PR barnyardgrass 21 DAE, but not all season long. In contrast, imazethapyr in Clearfield rice controlled all grass weeds 100% all season long. Midpostemergence (MPOST) bispyribac application at the four- to five-leaf stage also provided season-long control of all barnyardgrass biotypes (> 88%, 56 DAE). Rice yields ranged from 5,300 to 5,700 kg ha−1 in conventional weed-control treatments and from 2,800 to 5,000 kg ha−1 in imazethapyr-treated plots. Nontreated plots yielded 1,500 kg ha−1.

La selección intensiva de presión a partir del uso repetido de propanil y quinclorac condujo al desarrollo de herbicidas resistentes a los biotipos de barnyardgrass (echinochloa crus-galli). Veintidós muestras de campo compuestas fueron estudiadas para medir el nivel de resistencia en 2002 y 2003. También se llevaron al cabo otros estudios de campo en el Centro de Investigación Extensiva de Arroz en Stuttgart, Arkansas en 2002 y 2003 para evaluar herbicidas alternativos para el arroz con el fin de controlar la resistencia al propanil (RP) y la resistencia del barnyardgrass al quinclorac (RQ). De las 22 muestras compuestas cuatro fueron resistentes al propanil RP (de un 30 a un 40% de control); cuatro tuvieron una población mixta de resistencia al propanil y quinclorac RP, RQ, y fueron susceptibles al barnyardgrass; y dos tuvieron múltiple resistencia al quinclorac y propanil (R P/Q), con un control a partir del propanil de un 15 a un 30% y el control a partir de quinclorac de un 5 a un 10%. Se usó la variedad de arroz “Wells” donde se evaluaron los programas de herbicida convencional y arroz Clearfiel ‘CL-161’ (resistente a imidazolinone) para los programas que incluyeron imazethapyr. Todos los barnyardgrass resistentes al propanil y quinclorar fueron controlados en un >90% por herbicidas alternativos, incluyendo tratamientos de pre-emergencia (PE) y pre-emergencia tardía (DPRE). A los 56 días después de la emergencia (DAE), el cyhalofop o el fenoxapop aplicado a la barnyardgrass en una etapa de dos o tres hojas (temprana post-emergencia, EPOST) antes de la inundación del cultivo, controló barnyardgrass en >93%. El pedimethalin controló la barnyardgrass resistente al propanil a los 21 (DAE) días después del experimento, pero no durante todo el curso de la estación. En contraste, el imazethapyr en el arroz Clearfiel controló todas las malezas en un 100% durante toda la estación. El bispyribac a emergencia media (MPOST) aplicado en un estrado de 4 a 5 hojas, proporcionó también un control durante toda la estación a todos los biotipos de barnyardgrass (>88%, >56 DAE). Los rendimientos del arroz fueron de 5300 a 5700 Kg ha−1 usando tratamientos de control convencional de malezas y de 4800 a 5000 Kg ha−1. en las parcelas tratadas con imazethapyr. Los testigos no tratados tuvieron un rendimiento de 1500 Kg ha−1.

Keywords

BispyribacclomazonecyhalofopfenoxapropimazethapyrmolinatependimethalinpropanilquincloracthiobencarbbarnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ECHCGriceOryza sativa L. ‘Wells’ and ‘CL-161’Multiple-resistant barnyardgrassrice injuryrice yield
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 226 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F. L., Talbert, R. E., Carey, V. F. III, Kitt, M. J., Helms, R. S., Black, H. L., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1996. A historical review of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass in Arkansas and field advice for its management in dry-seeded rice. Res. Ser. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull 453:1–8.Google Scholar
Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 8:576–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehring, N. W., Talbert, R. E., and Baldwin, F. L. 2006. Rice (Oryza sativa) response and annual grass control with graminicides. Weed Technol 20:738–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, N. R., Norsworthy, J. K., Scott, R. C., and Smith, K. L. 2008. Red rice (Oryza sativa) after five years of imidazolinone-resistant rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, V. F. III, Duke, S. O., Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995a. Resistance mechanism of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass: absorption, translocation, site of action studies. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 52:182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, V. F. III, Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995b. Verification and distribution of propanil–resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, V. F. III, Talbert, R. E., Baltazar, A. M., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1992. Propanil tolerant barnyardgrass in Arkansas. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 45:296.Google Scholar
Caseley, J. C., Palgrave, C., Haas, E., Riches, C. R., and Valverde, B. E. 1997. Herbicides with alternative modes of action for control of propanil- and fenoxaprop-resistant Echinochloa colona . Pages 215–220. in. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Brighton, Great Britain British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1997. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 50:237.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. J., Ateh, C. M., Bayer, D. E., and Hill, J. E. 2000. Herbicide-resistant Echinochloa oryzoides and E. phyllopogon in California Oryza sativa fields. Weed Sci 48:225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. J., Granados, E., and Trujillo, D. 1993. Propanil resistance in populations of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) in Colombian rice fields. Weed Sci 41:201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Bollich, P. K., Burns, A. B., and Walker, D. M. 1998a. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to clomazone. Weed Sci 46:374–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Miller, D. K., and Crawford, S. H. 1998b. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with soil-applied and postemergence herbicide programs. Weed Technol 12:69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. 2003. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: April 2, 2003.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press. 609.Google Scholar
LeBaron, H. M. and McFarland, J. 1988. Herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. Pages 336–352. in Green, M. B., LeBaron, H. M., and Moberg, W. K. eds. Managing resistance to agrochemicals, from fundamental research to practical strategies. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Lopez-Martinez, N., Marshall, G., and DePrado, R. 1997. Resistance of barnyardgrass to atrazine and quinclorac. Pestic. Sci 51:171–175.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelace, M. L. 2003. Implications of quinclorac use in Arkansas: impacts of quinclorac drift on tomato physiology and development of quinclorac resistance in barnyardgrass. Ph.D Dissertation. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas. 70–71.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Burgos, N. R., Scott, R. C., and Smith, K. L. 2007a. Consultant perspectives on weed management need in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:832–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Scott, R. C., and Smith, K. L. 2007b. Confirmation and management of clomazone-resistant barnyardgrass in rice. Res. Ser. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull 560:113–116.Google Scholar
Rutledge, J. S. 1999. Control of and genetic relationships among propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) populations in Arkansas. . Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas. 5.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1965. Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Baines, C., Curless, J. K., Norsworthy, J. K., Daou, H., Helms, R. S., and Black, H. L. 1996. Confirmation, distribution and control of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass. Res. Ser. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull 453:77–87.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E. and Burgos, N. R. 2007. History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Carey, V. F. III, Kitt, M. J., Helms, R. S., and Black, H. L. 1995. Control, biology and ecology of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass. Res. Ser. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull 446:23–31.Google Scholar
Valverde, B. E. 2007. Status and management of grass-weed herbicide resistance in Latin America. Weed Technol 21:310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, B. E. and Itoh, K. 2001. World rice and herbicide resistance. Pages 145–249. in Powles, S. R. and Shaner, D. eds. Herbicide Resistance in World Grains. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Vasilakoglou, I. B., Eleftherohorinos, I. G., and Dhima, K. V. 2000. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), biotypes found in Greece. Weed Technol 14:524–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook, 8th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 51–181.Google Scholar
Williams, B. J., Strahan, R., and Webster, E. P. 2002. Weed management systems for Clearfield rice. La. Agric 45:16–17.Google Scholar