Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:31:52.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Postemergence Herbicides and Cultivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert J. Parks ,
William S. Curran ,
Gregory W. Roth ,
Nathan L. Hartwig  and
Dennis D. Calvin
Robert J. Parks
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
William S. Curran
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
Gregory W. Roth
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
Nathan L. Hartwig
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
Dennis D. Calvin
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies assessed the susceptibility of three common lambsquarters biotypes to foliar-applied bromoxynil, dicamba, and thifensulfuron. Field studies evaluated the effectiveness of the same herbicides in conjunction with atrazine and row cultivation for the control of common lambsquarters in corn. In the field, bromoxynil was applied at 140, 280, and 420 g/ha, dicamba at 140, 280, and 560 g/ha, and thifensulfuron at 2, 3, and 4 g/ha. In the greenhouse, bromoxynil and thifensulfuron reduced common lambsquarters growth by at least 55%, while dicamba reduced growth 45% or less. Two of the three biotypes were resistant to atrazine. In the field, weed control was up to 70% better in cultivated plots than in noncultivated plots. Cultivation sometimes promoted additional weed emergence, but later emerging weeds rarely reached reproductive maturity. Atrazine improved the level of weed control only if triazine-susceptible weeds were present. The lowest rates of bromoxynil and dicamba (140 g/ha) controlled common lambsquarters 85% or greater even without cultivation, whereas control with the low rate of thifensulfuron (2 g/ha) was acceptable (greater than 85%) 8 wk after planting only in combination with cultivation. Combinations of reduced herbicide rates and mechanical cultivation provided effective, alternative control strategies for both triazine-resistant and susceptible common lambsquarters.

Keywords

Atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminebromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitriledicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEAL, corn, Zea mays L.Biotypereduced rate applicationtriazine-resistanceAbutilon theophrastiABUTH
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 728 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bicki, T. J., Wax, L. M., and Sipp, S. K. 1991. Evaluation of reduced herbicide strategies for weed control in coarse-textured soils. J. Prod. Agric. 4:516–519.Google Scholar
2. Curran, W. S. 1993. Weed control in corn. p. 55 in Penn State Agronomy Guide 1993–94. Coll. of Agric. Sci., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA.Google Scholar
3. Fielding, R. J. and Stoller, E. W. 1990. Effects of additives on the efficacy, uptake, and translocation of methyl ester of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 38:172–178.Google Scholar
4. Fuerst, P. E., Arntzen, C. J., Pfister, K., and Penner, D. 1986. Herbicide cross resistance in triazine-resistant biotypes of four species. Weed Sci. 34:344–353.Google Scholar
5. Fuerst, E. P., Barrett, M., and Penner, D. 1986. Control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and two pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:440–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gentsch, B. J. and Weber, J. B. 1984. The efficacy of bromoxynil applied in irrigation water. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 37:112–118.Google Scholar
7. Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990. Negative cross resistance; a possible key to atrazine-resistance management: a call for whole plant data. Z. Naturforsch. 45c:470–473.Google Scholar
8. Hagood, E. S. 1989. Control of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 3:136–142.Google Scholar
9. Harvey, S. J. and Forcella, F. 1993. Vernal seedling emergence model for common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci. 41:309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. East-West Center Book, Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. p. 84–91.Google Scholar
11. Malik, N. 1990. Weed control during establishment and yield response of timothy (Phleum pratense). Weed Technol. 4:598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Marriage, P. B. and Warwick, S. I. 1980. Differential growth and response to atrazine between and within susceptible and resistant biotypes of Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 20:9–15.Google Scholar
13. Parks, R. J., Curran, W. S., and Roth, G. W. 1994. Herbicide susceptibility and biological fitness of triazine-resistant and susceptible common lambsquarters. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:23.Google Scholar
14. Stidham, M. A. 1991. Herbicides that inhibit acetohydroxyacid synthase. Weed Sci. 39:428–434.Google Scholar
15. Teasdale, J. R., Beste, C. E., and Potts, W. E. 1991. Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 39:195–199.Google Scholar