Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:58:26.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and Rotational Crop Response to Imazethapyr in Pea (Pisum sativum) and Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William K. Vencill ,
Henry P. Wilson ,
Thomas E. Hines  and
Kriton K. Hatzios
William K. Vencill
Affiliation:
East. Shore Agric. Exp. Stn., Painter, VA 23420
Henry P. Wilson
Affiliation:
East. Shore Agric. Exp. Stn., Painter, VA 23420
Thomas E. Hines
Affiliation:
East. Shore Agric. Exp. Stn., Painter, VA 23420
Kriton K. Hatzios
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Physiol. and Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1987 and 1988 to investigate the control of common lambsquarters in pea and snap bean following preplant incorporated, preemergence, and postemergence applications of imazethapyr at 36 to 69 g ai/ha. The residual activity of imazethapyr on rotational crops of sweet corn, grain sorghum, and cucumber was evaluated. All rates of imazethapyr provided good (>80% initially) control of common lambsquarters. Although imazethapyr caused some injury to both pea and snap bean, yields were not reduced except for snap bean following postemergence applications. Imazethapyr residues resulting from the applications of 36 to 69 g/ha caused visible injury and fresh weight reductions to all three rotational crops.

Keywords

Imazethapyr, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. ♯3 CHEALcucumber, Cucumis sativus L. ‘Poinsett’grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.)Moench. ‘Corral’pea, Pisum sativum L. ‘Progress No. 9’snap bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Atlantic’, sweet corn, Zea mays L. saccharata ‘Merit’Residual activitymetolachlorpendimethalinCHEAL
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 39 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bagley, P. C. 1980. New herbicides for narrow-row snap beans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:176–186.Google Scholar
2. Basham, G. W., and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G. W., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Dan Scott, H. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.Google Scholar
4. Beste, C. E. 1988. Imazethapyr for lima beans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:190.Google Scholar
5. Flint, J. L., and Wit, W. W. 1988. Soil temperatures and moisture effects on imazaquin and imazethapyr degradation. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:338.Google Scholar
6. Kee, E., and Rider, L. 1988. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, soil residual activity of imazethapyr on peas and lima beans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:191–198.Google Scholar
7. Majek, B. 1988. Imazethapyr residue effects on several vegetable crops. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:227.Google Scholar
8. Majek, B. 1988. Imazethapyr as a broadleaf herbicide for edible legume crops. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. No. 63.Google Scholar
9. Monaco, T. J. 1988. Evaluation of imazethapyr for weed control in snap beans and lima beans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:129.Google Scholar
10. Porter, G. A., Bellinder, R. R., Morrow, L. S., Warholic, D. T., Ashley, R. A., and Mascianica, M. P. 1988. Bentazon and bentazon/MCPB tank mixes for weed control in English peas. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:235–242.Google Scholar
11. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.Google Scholar
12. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.Google Scholar
13. Rice, R. P., and Putnam, A. R. 1980. Temperature influences on uptake, translocation, and metabolism of alachlor in snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 28:131–138.Google Scholar
14. Vencill, W. K., Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., and Hatzios, K. K. 1988. Evaluation of imazethapyr performance in peas and snap beans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:200.Google Scholar
15. Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1987. Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) response to acifluorfen. Weed Technol. 1:18–21.Google Scholar