Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:12:04.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chloramben for Weed Control on Muck-grown Lettuce, Lactuca sativa, and Endive, Cichorium endivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stanley F. Gorski ,
Stephen Reiners  and
Richard Hassell
Stanley F. Gorski
Affiliation:
The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Stephen Reiners
Affiliation:
The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Richard Hassell
Affiliation:
The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chloramben effectively controlled weeds in lettuce and endive grown on muck soils better than thiobencarb and chlorpropham. Chloramben at 1.1 kg ai/ha controlled two weeds economically important on muck soils, livid amaranth and oakleaf goosefoot. Chloramben applied preemergence at 1.1 kg/ha and higher caused early stunting of lettuce which the lettuce outgrew by harvest. Field-seeded endive was stunted severely at these same rates, severely reducing yield. Transplants improved tolerance of all crops. Effective use rates on muck soils were 25% to 50% of those typically used on mineral soils.

Keywords

chloramben, 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acidchlorpropham, 1-methylethyl 3-chlorophenylcarbamatethiobencarb, S-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl] diethylcarbamothioateendive, Cichorium endivia L.lettuce, Lactuca sativa L.livid amaranth, Amaranthus lividus L. # AMALIoakleaf goosefoot, Chenopodium glacum L. # CHEGLChlorprophamthiobencarbAMALIAMARECHEGLPOLPYPOROL
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 262 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Donaldson, T. W., and Foy, C. L. 1965. The phytotoxicity and persistence of benzoic acid herbicides. Weed Sci. 13:195–201.Google Scholar
2. Eshel, Y., and Warren, G. F. 1967. A simplified method for determining phytotoxicity, leaching and adsorption. Weed Sci. 15:115–18.Google Scholar
3. Rauser, W. E., and Switzer, C. M. 1962. Factors contributing to the loss of amiben phytotoxicity in soils. Weed Sci. 10:62–64.Google Scholar
4. Sommerville, D. N., and Wax, L. M. 1971. Influence of incorporation depth on chloramben activity. Weed Sci. 19:394–97.Google Scholar
5. Talbert, R. E., Runyan, E. L., and Baker, H. B. 1970. Behavior of amiben and dinoben derivatives in Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 18:10–15.Google Scholar
6. Warren, G. F. 1963. Adsorption of amiben in soils. Hormolog 4:15–16.Google Scholar