Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:14:05.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Cereal Rye Cover Crop Termination Management for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Suppression in Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2024

Cynthia Sias
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Virginia Tech, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Kevin W. Bamber
Affiliation:
Research Specialist Senior, Virginia Tech, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Michael L Flessner*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Virginia Tech, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
*
Author for correspondence: Michael Flessner, Associate Professor, Virginia Tech, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, 675 Old Glade Road, Blacksburg, VA 24061. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Palmer amaranth is a troublesome weed species displaying the ability to adapt and evolve resistance to multiple herbicide modes of action, and there is a need for additional weed suppression tactics. Growing interest in the use of cover crops (CC) has led to questions regarding the most appropriate forms of CC management prior to cash crop planting in order to maximize weed suppression benefits. Experiments were conducted between 2021 to 2023 to test: 1) cover crop termination timing (i.e., green or brown), 2) CC biomass amount and 3) CC termination method (i.e., rolled or left standing) on Palmer amaranth suppression. Treatments included “planting brown” (cereal rye terminated two weeks before soybean planting), “planting green” (cereal rye terminated at soybean planting), and a no CC (winter fallow) check. Palmer amaranth emergence was evaluated at 4 and 6 weeks after soybean planting, and yield was calculated at harvest. CC reduced Palmer amaranth emergence when compared to the no CC check, and more suppression was observed as CC biomass increased. This decrease in emergence is potentially due to a decrease in light penetration reaching the soil surface and physical suppression as CC biomass increased. Yield, however, was unaffected by any CC management practice, indicating that growers can tailor CC termination practices for weed suppression. This information will provide better recommendations for farmers interested in using cover crops for weed suppression. Overall, the importance of CC biomass accumulation to achieve weed suppression is highlighted in our findings. Additionally, we add to the growing body of documentation that soybean yield may be variable from year to year as a result of CC presence.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2024