Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:21:37.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carfentrazone-Ethyl Injury to Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Is Minimized by Some ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kirk A. Howatt
Kirk A. Howatt*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5051
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many herbicides that control broadleaf weeds in wheat can antagonize grass herbicide efficacy, resulting in less grain yield due to competition. Also, the broadleaf herbicide carfentrazone-ethyl can injure wheat, leading to less grain yield because of physiological response. Experiments were conducted to evaluate carfentrazone-ethyl antagonism of fenoxaprop-ethyl, tralkoxydim, clodinafop-propargyl, imazamethabenz, and flucarbazone-sodium and injury to wheat with tank mixes of carfentrazone-ethyl plus each grass herbicide or thifensulfuron, tribenuron, metsulfuron, or imazamox. Carfentrazone-ethyl did not adversely affect control of wild oat or yellow foxtail by grass herbicides in wheat. Carfentrazone-ethyl alone caused 21% wheat injury 3 d after treatment. Adding flucarbazone-sodium to carfentrazone-ethyl resulted in the least wheat injury among treatments that included carfentrazone-ethyl. Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl or clodinafop-propargyl with carfentrazone-ethyl also resulted in less wheat injury compared with carfentrazone-ethyl alone, which was attributed to formulation safeners. Sulfonylurea herbicides provided safening of carfentrazone-ethyl similar to flucarbazone-sodium, while imidazolinones did not alleviate injury. Tralkoxydim plus carfentrazone-ethyl gave 28% wheat injury compared with 21% from carfentrazone-ethyl alone. Wheat injury was no longer visible by 20 d after treatment, and wheat yield was not affected by carfentrazone-ethyl injury when wild oat and yellow foxtail were present or controlled with herbicide.

Keywords

Carfentrazone-ethylclodinafop-propargylfenoxaprop-P-ethylflucarbazone-sodiumtralkoxydimyellow foxtail, Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv. # SETLUwild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAwheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Alsen’, ‘ND722’, ‘Oxen’Antagonismcrop injurysafening with herbicidesimazamethabenzimazamoxthifensulfurontribenuronmetsulfuronALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)COC, crop oil concentrateDAT, days after treatmentMSO, methylated seed oilNIS, nonionic surfactantPO, petroleum oilUAN, urea and ammonium nitrate solution
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 777 - 783
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barton, D. L., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1992. Integrated wild oat (Avena fatua) management affects spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) yield and economics. Weed Technol. 6:129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J. and Morrison, I. A. 1993. Effect of ethafluralin and other herbicides on trifluralin-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Technol. 7:6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., and Brownie, C. 1999. Influence of bromoxynil on annual grass control by graminicides. Weed Sci. 47:123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Duke, S. O., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Selectivity and mode of action of carfentrazone-ethyl, a novel phenyl triazolinone herbicide. Pestic. Sci. 51:65–73.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dernoeden, P. H. and Fidanza, M. A. 1994. Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl activity influenced by auxin-like herbicide application timing. Hortscience 29:1518–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschamps, R. J. A., Hsiao, A. I., and Quick, W. A. 1990. Antagonistic effect of MCPA on fenoxaprop-P-ethyl activity. Weed Sci. 38:62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durgan, B. R., Yenish, J. P., Daml, R. J., and Miller, D. W. 1997. Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426. Weed Technol. 11:489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fandrich, L., McDonald, S. K., Nissen, S. J., Westra, P., and Santel, H. J. 2001. Absorption and fate of BAY MKH 6561 in jointed goatgrass and downy brome. Weed Sci. 49:717–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frear, D. S. and Swanson, H. R. 1996. Cytochrome P450-dependent hydroxylation of prosulfuron (CGA 152005) by wheat seedling microsomes. J. Ag. Food Chem. 44:3658–3664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. H. 1997. Partitioning of biologically active radiation in plant canopies. Int. J. Biometeorol. 40:26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glogoza, P., McMullen, M., Zollinger, R., Thostenson, A., DeJong, T., Meyer, W., Schauer, N., and Olson, J. 2002. Pesticide Use and Pest Management Practices for Major Crops in North Dakota, 2000. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University Extension Service. Extension Report 79. 90 pp.Google Scholar
Hacker, E., Bieringer, H., Willms, L., Rosch, W., Kocher, H., Wolf, R., Haas, H. U., and Hurle, K. 2000. Mefenpyr-diethyl: a safener for fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and iodosulfuron in cereals. Proceedings 20th Germal Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control, Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany, March 14–16 17:493–500.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., and Kirkland, K. J. 1995. Ethametsulfuron interactions with grass herbicides on canola (Brassica napus, B. rapa). Weed Technol. 9:91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M. G. and Smith, H. 1977. The function of phytochrome in natural environment. II. The influence of vegetation canopies on the spectral energy distribution of natural daylight. Photochem PhotoBiol. 25:539–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Influence of adjuvants on the antagonism of graminicides by broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 9:741–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. 1993. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) competition. Weed Technol. 7:890–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscott, D. L. and Vaughan, R. H. 1990. Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl for annual foxtail (Setaria sp.) control in seedling perennial forages. Weed Technol. 4:560–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medd, R. W., Van de Ven, R. J., Pickering, D. I., and Nordblom, T. 2001. Determination of environment-specific dose-response relationships for clodinafop-propargyl on Avena spp. Weed Res. 41:351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Antagonism of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, haloxyfop, and sethoxydim by 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 3:86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, V. K. and Manthey, F. A. 2002. Response of kochia (Kochia scoparia) inbreds to 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Technol. 16:50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsdale, B. K. and Messersmith, C. G. 2002. Low-rate split-applied herbicide treatments for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 16:149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riechers, D. E., Yang, K., Irzyk, G. P., Jones, S. S., and Fuerst, E. P. 1996. Variability of glutathione S-transferase levels and dimethenamid tolerance in safener-treated wheat and wheat relatives. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 56:88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spandl, E., Durgan, B. R., and Miller, D. W. 1997. Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Syngenta] Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 2004. Material Safety Data Sheet: Discover herbicide. Web page: http://www.cdms.net/ldat/mp3RQ027.pdf. Accessed: April 13, 2005.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. M. and Nissen, S. J. 2000. Absorption and fate of carfentrazone-ethyl in Zea mays, Glycine max, and Abutilon theophrasti . Weed Sci. 48:15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, W. M. and Nissen, S. J. 2002. Influence of shade and irrigation on the response of corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) to carfentrazone-ethyl. Weed Technol. 16:314–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, R. K., Ries, J. L., and Hammond, J. J. 2003. Survey of weeds in North Dakota—2000. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University Extension Service. Extension Report 83. 97 pp.Google Scholar