Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:30:45.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea) Response to Pendimethalin Applied Posttransplant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew J. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Robin R. Bellinder*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Bin Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Bradley J. Rauch
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Martin C. Goffinet
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456
Mary Jean C. Welser
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Field and greenhouse studies were conducted from 1997 to 2001 to determine cabbage response to posttransplant applications of pendimethalin (0.56 to 2.24 kg ai/ha). Differential variety response was minimal, and applications greater than 0.56 kg caused severe and persistent crop injury and reduced head number and yield in ‘Azan’, ‘Storage 4’, ‘Super Elite’, and ‘Super Red 90’. Pendimethalin (1.7 kg) applied posttransplant reduced cabbage yield weights 23, 30, and 87% with bare root, large, and small transplants, respectively. Application (0.84 kg) to soil, foliage, or soil and foliage caused 0, 81, and 82% dry weight reduction by 21 d after treatment, respectively. Anatomical analysis of two-leaf seedlings collected 3 wk after pendimethalin treatment (1.12 kg ai/ha) showed stunting of the shoot apical meristem and its emerging leaves, disorganization of apical structure with disruption of normal cell division and cell expansion, and abnormal differentiation of the vasculature in leaves and hypocotyls.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K., Libbey, C., and Kadir, S. 1995. Broadleaf weed control and cabbage seed yield following herbicide applications. Hortic. Sci. 30: 12111214.Google Scholar
Bayer, G. H. 1978. A three year summary of velvetleaf control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 23: 314316.Google Scholar
Bellinder, R. R. and Warholic, D. T. 1988. Evaluation of acetanilide injury to cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and potential for yield reduction. Weed Technol. 2: 350354.Google Scholar
Berlyn, G. P. and Miksche, J. P. 1976. Botanical Microtechnique and Cytochemistry. Ames, IA: Iowa State University. 326 p.Google Scholar
Bond, W. and Burch, P. J. 1989. The response of Brassica and other vegetables to foliar-applied pendimethalin. Tests of agrochemicals and cultivars. Ann. Appl. Biol. 114:(suppl. 10). 78.Google Scholar
Boodley, J. W. and Sheldrake, R. Jr. 1977. Cornell Peat–Lite Mixes for Commercial Plant Growing. Information Bulletin No. 43. New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. 8 p.Google Scholar
Malefyt, T. and Duke, W. B. 1984. Pendimethalin phytotoxicity to velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii). Weed Sci. 32: 520524.Google Scholar
Parka, S. J. and Soper, O. F. 1977. The physiology and mode of action of the dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 25: 7987.Google Scholar
Sharman, B. C. 1943. Tannic acid and iron alum with safranin and orange gold in studies of the shoot apex. Stain Technol. 18: 105111.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. C. and Lehnen, L. P. 1991. Mitotic disrupter herbicides. Weed Sci. 39: 450457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar