Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:58:08.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bispyribac–Sodium Efficacy on Early Watergrass (Echinochloa oryzoides) and Late Watergrass (Echinochloa Phyllopogon) as Affected by Coapplication of Selected Rice Herbicides and Insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christos A. Damalas ,
Kico V. Dhima  and
Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos
Christos A. Damalas
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
Kico V. Dhima
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Crop Science, Technological and Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, 541 01 Sindos, Greece
Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of application rate, growth stage, and tank mixing azimsulfuron, bentazon, MCPA, propanil, or cyhalofop on the efficacy of bispyribac–sodium against early watergrass and late watergrass from rice fields in northern Greece. Mixtures of bispyribac–sodium with the insecticides carbaryl, diazinon, and dichlorvos were also evaluated. Bispyribac–sodium (24 to 36 g ai/ha) applied alone at the three- to four-leaf growth stage provided 89 to 100% control of early watergrass and 84 to 100% control of late watergrass. When bispyribac–sodium was applied alone at the five- to six-leaf growth stage of early watergrass and late watergrass, control ranged from 78 to 100% and 71 to 100%, respectively. Mixtures of bispyribac–sodium with azimsulfuron provided better control of both species at any growth stage than bispyribac–sodium applied alone. On the contrary, mixtures of bispyribac–sodium with bentazon, MCPA, or propanil were less effective on both species at any growth stage than bispyribac–sodium applied alone. A slight efficacy reduction occurred on both species for the mixture of bispyribac–sodium with cyhalofop. Mixtures of bispyribac–sodium with the insecticides carbaryl or dichlorvos showed reduced efficacy on both species, whereas increased efficacy on both species was observed for mixtures of bispyribac–sodium with diazinon as compared with the single application of bispyribac–sodium.

Keywords

Azimsulfuronbentazonbispyribac–sodiumcarbarylcyhalofopdiazinondichlorvosMCPApropanilearly watergrass, Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch ECHORlate watergrass, Echinochloa phyllopogon (Stapf) Koss. ECHPHrice, Oryza sativa L.Antagonismherbicide interactionsmixtures
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 622 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Asíns, M. J., Carretero, J. L., del Busto, A., Carbonell, E. A., and Gómez de Barreda, D. 1999. Morphologic and isozyme variation in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa) weed species. Weed Technol 13:209–215.Google Scholar
Braverman, M. P. and Jordan, D. L. 1996. Efficacy of KIH-2023 in dry- and water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 10:876–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brommer, C. L., Shaw, D. R., Duke, S. O., Reddy, K. N., and Willeford, K. O. 2000. Antagonism of BAS 625 by selected broadleaf herbicides and the role of ethanol. Weed Sci 48:181–187.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1988. Interactions of carbaryl and dimethoate with sethoxydim. Weed Technol 2:433–436.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1982. Enhanced phytotoxicity of bentazon with organophosphate and carbamate insecticides. Weed Sci 30:324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretero, J. L. 1981. El género Echinochloa Beauv. en el suroeste de Europa. An. Jard. Bot. Madrid 38:91–108.Google Scholar
Carretero, J. L. 1989. Variación en la sensibilidad al propanil del género Echinochloa de los arrozales valencianos (España). Pages 407–411. in. Proceedings of the 4th EWRS Mediterranean Symposium, Valencia, Spain. European Weed Research Society.Google Scholar
Carretero, J. L., Gómez de Barreda, D., Balasch, S., del Busto, A., and Lladró, M. A. 1997. Variación en la sensibilidad al molinato del género Echinochloa de los arrozales valencianos. Pages 247–251. in. Congreso del Sociedad Española de Malherbología, Valencia, Spain. Sociedad Española de Malherbología.Google Scholar
Damalas, C. A., Dhima, K. V., and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 2006. Control of early watergrass (Echinochloa oryzoides) and late watergrass (Echinochloa phyllopogon) with cyhalofop, clefoxydim, and penoxsulam applied alone and in mixture with broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol 20:992–998.Google Scholar
Damalas, C. A., Dhima, K. V., and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 2008. Morphological and physiological variation among species of the genus Echinochloa in northern Greece. Weed Sci 56:416–423.Google Scholar
Danquah, E. Y., Johnson, D. E., Riches, C., Arnold, G. M., and Karp, A. 2002. Genetic diversity in Echinochloa spp. collected from different geographic origins and within rice fields in Côte d'Ivoire. Weed Res 42:394–405.Google Scholar
Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 411.Google Scholar
Dodds, D. M., Reynolds, D. B., Massey, J. H., Smith, M. C., and Koger, C. H. 2007. Effect of adjuvant and urea ammonium nitrate on bispyribac efficacy, absorption, and translocation in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). II. Absorption and translocation. Weed Sci 55:406–411.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. J., Bayer, D. E., Carriere, M. D., Ateh, C. M., and Yim, K-O. 2000. Mechanisms of resistance to bispyribac–sodium in an Echinochloa phyllopogon accession. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 68:156–165.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. J., Cheetham, D. P., Vidotto, F., and De Prado, R. 2004. Enhanced effect of thiobencarb on bispyribac–sodium control of Echinochloa phyllopogon (Stapf) Koss. in California rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Biol. Manag 4:206–212.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D. and Fischer, A. J. 2001. Relative growth and photosynthetic response of water-seeded rice and Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch to shade. Int. J. Pest Manage 47:305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Fischer, A. J., and Foin, T. C. 2004. Compensatory responses of late watergrass (Echinochloa phyllopogon) and rice to resource limitations. Weed Sci 52:271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. E., Le Strange, M. L., Bayer, D. E., and Williams, J. F. 1985. Integrated weed management in California. Proc. West. Weed Sci. Soc 38:100.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Dodds, D. M., and Reynolds, D. B. 2007. Effect of adjuvants and urea ammonium nitrate on bispyribac efficacy, absorption, and translocation in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). I. Efficacy, rainfastness, and soil moisture. Weed Sci 55:399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, S. H., Jordan, D. L., Spears, J. F., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., Monks, D. W., Batts, R. B., and Brandenburg, R. L. 2005a. Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) control and seed production after 2,4-DB applied alone and with fungicides or insecticides. Weed Technol 19:451–455.Google Scholar
Lancaster, S. H., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Burke, I. C., Corbin, F. T., Sheldon, Y. S., Wilcut, J. W., and Monks, D. W. 2005b. Influence of selected fungicides on efficacy of clethodim and sethoxydim. Weed Technol 19:397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, S. H., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., Brandenburg, R. L., and Monks, D. W. 2005c. Interactions of late-season morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) management practices in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol 19:803–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, S. H., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., Monks, D. W., and Brandenburg, R. L. 2005d. Interactions of clethodim and sethoxydim with selected agrichemicals applied to peanut. Weed Technol 19:456–461.Google Scholar
Lopez-Martinez, N., Salva, A. P., Finch, R. P., Marshall, G., and De Prado, R. 1999. Molecular markers indicate intraspecific variation in the control of Echinochloa spp. with quinclorac. Weed Sci 47:310–315.Google Scholar
Ntanos, D., Eleftherohorinos, I. G., Giamoustaris, G., and Philippou, N. 1992. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with pretilachlor, quinclorac, and thiobencarb. Agr. Med 122:54–58.Google Scholar
Pankey, J. H., Griffin, J. L., Leonard, B. R., Miller, D. K., Downer, R. G., and Costello, R. W. 2004. Glyphosate-insecticide combinations effects on weed and insect control in cotton. Weed Technol 18:698–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherder, E. F., Talbert, R. E., and Lovelace, M. L. 2005. Antagonism of cyhalofop grass activity by halosulfuron, triclopyr, and propanil. Weed Technol 19:934–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, L. A., Talbert, R. E., Baldwin, F. L., Rutledge, J. S., Scherder, E. F., and Wheeler, C. C. 1999. Performance of V-10029 (bispyribac–sodium) in rice weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:49.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern US rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol 2:232–241.Google Scholar
Vidotto, F., Tesio, F., Tabacchi, M., and Ferrero, A. 2006. Herbicide sensitivity of Echinochloa spp. accessions in Italian rice fields. Crop Prot 26:285–293.Google Scholar
Waldrop, D. D. and Banks, P. A. 1983. Interactions of herbicides with insecticides in soybeans. Weed Sci 31:730–734.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. and Webster, E. P. 2002. Shoot and root growth of rice (Oryza sativa) in response to V-10029. Weed Technol 16:768–772.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., and Leon, C. T. 2005. Response of rice cultivars to V-10029. Weed Technol 19:307–311.Google Scholar