Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:06:00.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annual Broadleaf Control With KIH-485 in Glyphosate-Resistant Furrow-Irrigated Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. King  and
Josefina O. Garcia
Steven R. King*
Affiliation:
Department of Research Centers, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Huntley, MT 59037
Josefina O. Garcia
Affiliation:
Department of Research Centers, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Huntley, MT 59037
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed management in furrow-irrigated corn is challenging because of weed emergence associated with each irrigation event. Residual herbicides that provide extended in-season control of a broad spectrum of weeds would be beneficial to producers in this system. Field experiments were conducted in 2005 and 2006 in Yellowstone County, Montana, to evaluate KIH-485 for the control of velvetleaf, kochia, and wild buckwheat in furrow-irrigated corn. KIH-485 was applied at three rates (166, 209, and 250 g ai/ha) and two timings (PRE and POST) and compared to standard rates of S-metolachlor, acetochlor, and pendimethalin. All PRE treatments were applied alone, whereas POST treatments were combined with 1,261 g ae/ha of glyphosate. All rates of KIH-485 applied PRE controlled velvetleaf and kochia 88% or greater at 4 mo after planting (MAP). Wild buckwheat was controlled 89% or greater with the high rate of KIH-485 applied PRE, which was superior to control achieved with any other PRE herbicide treatment. Velvetleaf, kochia, and wild buckwheat were controlled 91% or greater when any herbicide treatment was combined with glyphosate. Corn treated with KIH-485 applied at 209 g ai/ha PRE produced yield that was similar to that produced by the weed-free control in both years.

Keywords

AcetochlorglyphosateKIH-485, 3-[(5-difluoromethoxy-1-methyl-3-trifluoromethylpyrazol-4-yl)methylsufonyl]-4,5-dihydro-5,5-dimethylisoxazoleS-metolachlorpendimethalinkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. KCHSCvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ABUTHwild buckwheat, Polygonium convolvulus L. POLCOcorn, Zea mays (L.) ZEAMXHerbicidePREkochiaresidual controlvelvetleafwild buckwheat
Type
Weed Management — Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 420 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2006. KIH-485 experimental herbicide technical information. White Plains, NY Kumiai Chemical Industry 8.Google Scholar
[ARM] Agriculture Research Manager 2003. ARM Quick Reference, version 7. Brookings, SD Gylling Data Management, Inc.Google Scholar
Currie, R. S. and Regehr, D. L. 2005. Comparisons of KIH-485 and S-metolachlor for weed control in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:84.Google Scholar
Dyer, C. D., Bauman, T. T., and White, M. D. 2004. Weed control and soil longevity of KIH-485, acetochlor, dimethenamid, and S-metolachlor. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:63.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., and Frihauf, J. C. 2006. KIH-485 and S-metolachlor efficacy comparisons in conventional and no-tillage corn. Weed Technol. 20:622–626.Google Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., Cardina, J., Harrison, S. K., Sprankle, P. L., Probst, N. J., Bauman, T. T., Bugg, W., Curran, W. S., Currie, R. S., Harvey, R. G., Johnson, W. G., Kells, J. J., Owen, M. D. K., Regehr, D. L., Slack, C. H., Spaur, M., Sprague, C. L., Vangessel, M., and Young, B. G. 2003. Effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn: results of a 2-yr multistate study. Weed Technol. 17:821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., Hart, S. E., Buresinger, M. L., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Scott, J. E., and Porpiglia, P. J. 2006. Dose response curves for KIH-485 irrigated corn with herbicides. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 61:42.Google Scholar
Myers, M. W., Curran, W. S., VanGessel, M. J., Majek, B. A., Scott, B. A., Mortensen, D. A., Calvin, D. D., Karsten, H. D., and Roth, G. W. 2005. The effect of weed density and application timing on weed control and corn grain yield. Weed Technol. 19:102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. G., York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 2006. Weed control in glyphosate-resistant corn as affected by preemergence herbicide and timing of postemergence herbicide application. Weed Technol. 20:564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkema, P. H., Shropshire, C., and Soltani, N. 2007. Dry bean response to preemergence-applied KIH-485. Weed Technol. 21:230–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, G. L., Porpiglia, P. J., and Chandler, J. M. 2005. Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) and selected broadleaf weeds in corn. Weed Technol. 19:866–869.Google Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 2002. Residual herbicides used in combination with glyphosate and glufosinate in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:274–281.Google Scholar