Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:38:28.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Integrated Weed Management Approach to Managing Foxtail Barley (Hordeum jubatum) in Conservation Tillage Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw ,
Greg Semach ,
Xiangju Li ,
John T. O'Donovan  and
K. Neil Harker
Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB. Canada T1J 4B1
Greg Semach
Affiliation:
Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB. Canada T1J 4B1
Xiangju Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050031 China
John T. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, Bag 4000, Vegreville, AB, Canada T0B 4L0
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 6000 C and E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada T4L 1W1
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 4-yr field experiment was conducted to determine the merits of combining cultural and chemical controls to manage foxtail barley in reduced-tillage systems. Factors studied were crop row spacing, seeding rate, and application rate and timing of glyphosate within a spring wheat-flax cropping sequence. Glyphosate applied preseeding at 400 or 800 g/ha killed foxtail barley seedlings but only suppressed established perennial plants. Glyphosate applied postharvest at 800 g/ha killed 60 to 70% of established plants. Combinations of preseeding and postharvest glyphosate gave the greatest reductions in foxtail barley biomass and seed production and resulted in the greatest increases in crop yield. Including flax in the rotation allowed use of grass herbicides such as quizalofop or sethoxydim that effectively controlled foxtail barley seedlings and provided some suppression of perennial plants. An increase in wheat seeding rate from 75 to 115 kg/ha reduced foxtail barley growth and increased wheat yield in 3 of 4 yr. Increasing the flax seeding rate from 40 to 80 kg/ha or reducing wheat and flax row spacing from 30 to 20 cm provided little benefit in managing foxtail barley or increasing crop yield. A multiyear approach combining agronomic practices and timely use of herbicides should allow growers to effectively manage foxtail barley in annual cropping systems using conservation tillage.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinequizalofop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onefoxtail barley, Hordeum jubatum L. #HORJUflax, Linum usitatissimum L. ‘Flanders’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Katepwa.’Crop rotationcultural weed controlglyphosaterow spacingseeding ratezero-tillageHORJUPAR, photosynthetically active radiation
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Lethbridge Research Center contribution 3879854.

References

Literature Cited

Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. 1988. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Baco Raton, FL: CRC Press. 354 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997. Crop Protection with Chemicals. Agdex 606-1. Edmonton. AB, Canada: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. pp. 38–239.Google Scholar
Best, K. E., Banting, J. D., and Bowes, G. C. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. 31. Hordeum jubatum L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:699–708.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Semach, G., and Entz, T. 1998. Postemergence control of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) seedlings in spring wheat and flax. Weed Technol. 12:610–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conn, J. S. and Deck, R. E. 1995. Optimal glyphosate application time for control of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum). Weed Technol. 9:267–269.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Blackshaw, R. E., and Boyetchko, S. M. 1996. Sustainability, conservation tillage and weeds in Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76:651–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1988. Established foxtail barley, Hordeum jubatum, control with glyphosate plus ammonium sulfate. Weed Technol. 2:364–368.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1990. Primary tillage for foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) control. Weed Technol. 4:318–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, L. F., Nickel, K. P., and Morrison, I. N. 1992. Round-leaved mallow (Malva pusilla) growth and interference in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and flax (Linum usitatissimum). Weed Sci. 40:448–454.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1997. Glyphosate or sethoxydim for quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in two tillage regimes. Weed Sci. 45:812–823.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. 1993. Weed management in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) in the absence of herbicides. J. Sustain. Agric. 3:95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M. and Janke, R. J. 1990. Sustainable weed management practices. In Francis, C. A., Flora, C. B., and King, L. D., eds. Sustainable Agriculture in Temperate Zones. New York: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 111–143.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Roman, E. S., Lindwall, C. W., and Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Weed management in conservation tillage systems for wheat production in North and South America. Crop Prot. 13:243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, Volume 2, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 633 p.Google Scholar
Stevenson, F. C. and Wright, A. T. 1996. Seeding rate and row spacing affect flax yields and weed interference. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76:537–544.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Frick, B. L., and Hall, L. M. 1997. Alberta Weed Survey—Cereal and Oilseed Crops. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Publ. 98-2. 242 p.Google Scholar