Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:38:01.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Seed Yield Response to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Najib Malik  and
John Waddington
Najib Malik
Affiliation:
Melfort, Sask. SOE 1A0, and Swift Current, Sask. S9H 3X2
John Waddington
Affiliation:
Melfort, Sask. SOE 1A0, and Swift Current, Sask. S9H 3X2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seedling alfalfa was injured by chlorsulfuron and sethoxydim plus 2,4-DB but recovered the following year as alfalfa seed yields were comparable to the hand-weeded control. Fluazifopbutyl and flamprop-methyl (active isomer) at 0.5 kg/ha did not affect seedling alfalfa adversely; however, seed yields were lower the following year compared to those treated at the 0.25-kg/ha rate. In established alfalfa, sethoxydim alone or with 2,4-DB applied annually did not affect seed yields adversely. However, 2,4-DB alone reduced seed yields in 2 of 5 yr. Alfalfa tolerated chlorsulfuron at 0.015 kg/ha but was damaged at the 0.03-kg/ha rate. Initial injury and later recovery without adverse effects on seed yield also were observed following annual treatments with bromoxynil, MCPA plus 2,4-DB and bentazon plus 2,4-DB.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidebromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrilechlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamideflamprop-methyl, N-benzoyl-N-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-DL-alaninefluazifop-butyl, (±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidMCPA, (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidalfalfa, Medicago sativa L. cv. BeaverAsulambentazonbromoxynilchlorsulfuronflamprop-methylfluazifop-butylMCPAsethoxydim2,4-DB
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 63 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Darwent, A. L., and Drabble, J. C. 1985. Effect of chlorsulfuron on the seed yield of alfalfa. Expert Comm. Weeds Res. Rep. (W. Sect.) 3:8.Google Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H., and Rinker, C. M. 1982. Weeds in new seedings of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) for seed production. Weed Sci. 30:20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dumain, L, and Darwent, A. L. 1985. Weed control in established alfalfa. Expert Comm. Weeds Res. Rep. (W. Sect.) 3:5–6.Google Scholar
4. Goplen, B. P. 1976. Effect of Embutox on alfalfa seed yields. Forage Notes 21:1:8–9.Google Scholar
5. Malik, N., and VandenBorn, W. H. 1988. The biology of Canadian weeds. 86. Galium aparine L. and Galium spurium L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Malik, N., and Waddington, J. 1989. Weed control strategies for forage legumes. Weed Technol. 3:288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Moyer, J. R., and Bergen, P. 1985. Effect of post-emergent applications of graminicides on quackgrass control in seed alfalfa. Expert Comm. Weeds Res. Rep. (W. Sect.) 3:22–23.Google Scholar
8. Toole, B. M. 1984. Crop tolerance and weed control in established alfalfa with hexazinone and chlorsulfuron. Expert Comm. Weeds Res. Rep. (W. Sect.) 3:24.Google Scholar
9. Waddington, J. 1977. Effects of applying 2,4-DB to alfalfa grown for seed. Forage Notes 22:68–69.Google Scholar
10. Waddington, J. 1980. Chemical control of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) grown for seed. Weed Sci. 28:164–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Waddington, J. 1985. Weed control in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) grown for seed. Weed Sci. 33:411–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar