Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:33:14.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Addressing Public Fears Over Pesticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Christopher S. Major  and
Ray D. William
Christopher S. Major
Affiliation:
ICI Agrichemicals, Fernhurst Haslemere Surrey GU27 3JE, UK
Ray D. William
Affiliation:
ICI Agrichemicals, Fernhurst Haslemere Surrey GU27 3JE, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Organizer's comments: Systems inquiry represents an array of research-based problem-solving approaches. European experience with the pesticide debate suggests several simple messages contained in this paper. As weed scientists, we have everything to gain by considering a global sphere of views, practices, logic, experience, and message. Read this paper for the essence, the message, the systems thinking, the research framework, and the interface between society and weed science. Read it because science and society must communicate.

Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 471 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Finney, J. R. 1988. World Crop Protection Prospects – Demisting the Crystal Ball. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. 1:3–14.Google Scholar
2. Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. 1985. Characterizing perceived risk. p. 91–125 in Perilous Progress: Managing the hazards of technology. Kates, R. W., Hohenemser, C., and Kasperson, J. X. (eds), Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar