Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:01:44.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Achieving Conservation Biology Objectives with Fire in the Pacific Northwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James K. Agee*
Affiliation:
College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

Abstract

Fire has been a part of natural ecosystems for many millennia. The species of those ecosystems have evolved through a series of “coarse filters,” one of which is resistance or resilience to disturbance by fire. Plant adaptations to fire include the ability to sprout, seed bank adaptations in the soil or canopy, high dispersal ability for seeds, and thick bark. These adaptations are often to a particular fire regime, or combination of fire frequency, intensity, extent, and season. Fire can be used by managers to achieve species to ecosystem-level conservation biology objectives. Examples using prescribed fire include the grasslands of the Puget Trough of Washington State, maintenance of oak woodlands, and perpetuation of ponderosa pine/mixed-conifer forests.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agee, J. K., 1993. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press, Washington, DC. 493 p.Google Scholar
2. Agee, J. K., and Muff, M. H. 1986. Structure and process goals for vegetation in wilderness areas. p. 1725 in Proceedings: National wilderness research conference. USDA For Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-212.Google Scholar
3. Brubaker, L. B., 1991. Climate change and the origin of old-growth Douglas-fir forests in the Puget Sound lowland. p. 1724 in Ruggiero, L. F., Aubry, K. A., Carey, A. B., and Huff, M. H., eds. Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. USDA Forest Service. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-285.Google Scholar
4. Cooper, C. F., 1960. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecol. Monogr. 30:129164.Google Scholar
5. Davies, J., 1980. Douglas of the Forests. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA. 188 p.Google Scholar
6. Franklin, J. F., and Dyrness, C. T. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-8. 417 p.Google Scholar
7. Griffin, J. R., 1977. Oak woodland. p. 384415 in Barbour, M., and Major, J., eds. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. California Native Plant Soc. Spec. Pub. 9. Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
8. Kauffman, J. B., 1990. Ecological relationships of vegetation and fire in Pacific Northwest forests. p. 3952 in Walstad, J., Radosevich, S. R., and Sandberg, D. V., eds. Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests. Oregon State Univ. Press, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
9. Weaver, H., 1943. Fire as an ecological and silvicultural factor in the ponderosa pine region of the Pacific slope. J. For. 41:715.Google Scholar
10. Wilkes, C., 1845. Narrative of the United States Expedition during the years 1838, 1839, 1841, 1842, Vol. 5. Lea and Blanchard, Philadelphia, PA. 658 p.Google Scholar
11. Wright, H. A., and Bailey, A. W. 1982. Fire Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 501 p.Google Scholar