Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:07:41.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Triclopyr in Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael P. Braverman*
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Abstract

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-triclopyr were compared in the rice cultivars ‘Lemont’ and ‘Tebonnet’ under flooded and non-flooded conditions. Radioactivity washed from 14C-triclopyr-treated leaves was 26% at 6 h and decreased to about 11% of that applied at 96 h after treatment. Triclopyr was immobile with 98% of the recovered 14C remaining in the treated rice leaf. An average of 19% of triclopyr was metabolized at 6 h and was similar among flooded and nonflooded rice cultivars. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of triclopyr did not differ among rice cultivars or flooding treatments.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, J. B., Dunand, R. T., and Zeringue, F. J. 1988. Rice weed control studies. Louisiana Rice Res. Stn. Annu. Res. Rep. 80:217234.Google Scholar
2. Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1988. Translocation and fate of dicamba, picloram, and triclopyr in horsenettle, (Solanum carolineuse). Weed Sci. 36:447452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Helms, R. S., Guy, C. B. Jr., and Grove, J. A. 1994. Influence of water management on triclopyr phytotoxicity to rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:214.Google Scholar
4. Hopkins, A., Strachan, W. F., Schwarzlose, G., Todd, L., and Ehlhardt, M. 1990. 1989 Results of triclopyr in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:118.Google Scholar
5. Ku, H. S., Suge, H., Rappaport, L., and Pratt, H. K. 1970. Stimulation of rice coleoptile growth by ethylene. Planta 90:333339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Lewer, P. and Owen, W. J. 1990. Selective action of the herbicide triclopyr. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 36:187200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Orfanenedes, M. S., Wax, L. M., and Liebl, R. A. 1993. Absence of role for absorption, translocation, and metabolism in differential selectivity of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to two pyridine herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Pantone, D. J. and Baker, J. B. 1992. Varietal tolerance of rice to bromoxynil and triclopyr at different growth stages. Weed Technol. 6:968974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Radosevich, S. A. and Bayer, D. E. 1979. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on triclopyr, picloram, and 2,4,5-T translocation. Weed Sci. 27:2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Raskin, I. and Kende, H. 1983. Regulation of growth in rice seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2:193203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) to acifluorfen and triclopyr applied alone or in tank mixtures with propanil. Weed Sci. 36:379383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Street, J. E., Baldwin, J. L., and Mueller, T. C. 1992. Influence of growth stage on rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance to triclopyr. Weed Technol. 6:930933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America. 6th ed. WSSA, Champaign, IL. p. 249250.Google Scholar