Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:18:21.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) as Influenced by Method of Metolachlor Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. James Grichar
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Yoakum, TX 77995
A. Edwin Colburn
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Ext. Serv., College Station, TX 77843
Paul A. Baumann
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Ext. Serv., College Station, TX 77843

Abstract

Field studies conducted from 1989 through 1991 evaluated methods of metolachlor application including POST followed by irrigation for yellow nutsedge control and peanut response. Metolachlor PPI stunted peanut in two of three years while metolachlor applied at emergence, 10, 20, or 30 days after peanut emergence (DAE) caused no peanut injury. Metolachlor 20 DAE provided > 95% yellow nutsedge control. Metolachlor soil-applied and again POST controlled yellow nutsedge at least 70%; however, some peanut stunting was noted. Bentazon plus metolachlor at 2.24 kg ai/ha controlled yellow nutsedge at least 92% when applied 30 DAE. Peanut yields were consistently the highest with metolachlor PRE at 1.40 kg ai/ha followed by a POST application of 1.40 kg ai/ha at 45 DAE.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1994. Dual herbicide. p. 468483 in Crop Protection Chemicals Reference, 11th ed., Chemical and Pharmaceutical Press, New York.Google Scholar
2. Bendixen, L. E., and Nandihalli, U. B. 1987. Worldwide distribution of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Beste, C. E., 1983. Herbicide Handbook. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., 1508 West University Ave., Champaign, IL 61821-3133.Google Scholar
4. Boswell, T. E., Merkle, M. G., and Grichar, W. J. 1976. Nutsedge control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:149.Google Scholar
5. Cardina, J., and Swann, C. W. 1988. Metolachlor effects on peanut growth and development. Peanut Sci. 15:5760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dowler, C. C., 1992. Weed Survey—Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:393407.Google Scholar
8. Fawcett, J. A., Harvey, R. G., Arnold, W. E., Bauman, T. T., Eberlein, C. V., Kells, J. J., Moshier, L. J., Slife, F. W., and Wilson, R. G. 1987. Influence of environment on corn (Zea mays) tolerance to sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 35:568575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Grichar, W. J., Boswell, T. E., and Merkle, M. G. 1981. Control of yellow nutsedge with selected herbicides. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 3858. 2 p.Google Scholar
10. Grichar, W. J., 1992. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 6:108112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. W., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press Hawaii, Honolulu. 609 p.Google Scholar
12. Keeley, P. E., and Thullen, R. J. 1974. Yellow nutsedge control with soil-incorporated herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:378383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Keeling, J. W., Bender, D. A., and Abernathy, J. R. 1990. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) management in transplanted onions (Allium cepa). Weed Technol. 4:6870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Pereira, W., Crabtree, G., and William, R. C. 1987. Herbicide action on purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:9298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Matthiesen, R. L. 1975. Response of yellow nutsedge and soybeans to bentazon, glyphosate, and perfluidone. Weed Sci. 23:215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Weber, J. B., and Peter, C. J. 1982. Adsorption, bioactivity, and evaluation of soil tests for alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 30:1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wehtje, G., Wilcut, J. W., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. 1988. Relative tolerance of peanuts to alachlor and metolachlor. Peanut Sci. 15:5356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6:177205.Google Scholar
19. Young, J. H., Person, N. K., Donald, J. O., and Mayfield, W. H. 1982. Harvesting, curing, and energy utilization. p. 458487 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. American Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX.Google Scholar