Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:47:54.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Worldwide Distribution of Purple and Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Leo E. Bendixen
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
U. B. Nandihalli
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210

Extract

The family Cyperaceae includes approximately 3000 species, of which about 220 species are identified as weeds (Table 1). Nearly 42% of these weeds are in the genus Cyperus. An additional 43% are in three other genera, Eleocharis, Scirpus, and Fimbristylis. The remaining 15% are found in six other genera, Scleria, Kyllinga, Rhynchospora, Bulbostylis, Fuira, and Dichromena. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L. # CYPRO) was identified as the world's worst weed based on the number of countries where it was reported as a serious, principal, or common weed. Competition with crops was the major factor in determining weediness. From the same report, yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES) ranked sixteenth. This contrasts with relative rankings of these two species in the United States where yellow nutsedge is more widespread than purple nutsedge.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1979. Report of the 1978 Cotton Weed Loss Committee. Proc. Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Google Scholar
2. Bell, R. S., Lachman, W. H., Rahn, E. M., and Sweet, R. D. 1962. Life history studies as related to weed control in the Northeast. 1. Nutgrass. Rhode Island Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 364.Google Scholar
3. Day, B. E., and Russell, R. C. 1955. The effect of drying on survival of nutgrass tubers. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 751.Google Scholar
4. Elmore, C. D., and Paul, R. N. 1983. Composite list of C4 weeds. Weed Sci. 31:686692.Google Scholar
5. Garg, D. K., Bendixen, L. E., and Anderson, S. R. 1967. Rhizome differentiation in yellow nutsedge. Weed Sci. 15:124128.Google Scholar
6. Holm, L. G., Pancho, J. V., Herberger, J. P., and Plucknett, D. L. 1979. A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 114115, 117–118.Google Scholar
7. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press Hawaii, Honolulu. p. 824, 125–133.Google Scholar
8. Jansen, L. L. 1971. Morphology and photoperiodic responses of yellow nutsedge. Weed Sci. 19:210219.Google Scholar
9. McCormick, L. L. 1977. Category I – weed survey - Southern States. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:184215.Google Scholar
10. Ranade, S. B., and Burns, W. 1925. The eradication of Cyperus rotundus L. (a study in pure and applied botany). Mem. Indian Dep. Agric. Bot. Ser. 13(5)99192.Google Scholar
11. Stoller, E. W. 1975. Differential cold tolerance, starch, sugar, protein, and lipid of yellow and purple nutsedge tubers. Plant Physiol. 55:859863.Google Scholar
12. Stoller, E. W. 1981. Yellow nutsedge: a menace in the Corn Belt. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1642.Google Scholar
13. Stoller, E. W., and Sweet, R. D. 1987. Biology and life cycle of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:6673.Google Scholar
14. Ueki, K. 1969. Studies on the control of nutsedge: on the germination of tubers. Proc. 2nd Asian-Pacific Weed Control Interchange. p. 355369.Google Scholar
15. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1970. Selected weeds of the United States. U. S. Dep. Agric. Handbook 366. p. 9699.Google Scholar
16. Wills, G. D. 1977. Pernicious weeds in cotton-nutsedge. Proc. Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. p. 164.Google Scholar
17. Wills, G. D. 1987. Description of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:29.Google Scholar