Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:08:07.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Potential of the Forage Legume Aeschynomene (Aeschynomene americana) in Rice (Oryza sativa) and Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ann M. Thro
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., La. State Univ. Agric. Cent., Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110
Alan T. Wier
Affiliation:
Dep. Entomol. (formerly Res. Assoc., Dep. Agron.), La. State Univ. Agric. Cent., Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110
F. Gilbert Barker
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., La. Agric. Exp. Stn., La. State Univ. Agric. Cent., Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110

Abstract

Growth room and field studies were conducted to determine if increasing use of forage aeschynomene may lead to new weed problems in rice and soybeans and to identify possible control measures in these crops. In a growth room study, flooding of ‘Florida Common’ and ‘LSU 1147’ forage aeschynomene did not reduce yield. However, forage aeschynomene seedlings did not emerge from a flooded seedbed, and 1-week-old seedlings were killed by 2.5 or 7.5 cm of flooding. Competition from interseeded forage aeschynomene reduced ‘Centennial’ soybean yields by 81%. Acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen, labeled for soybeans, control forage aeschynomene. Acifluorfen, labeled for rice, may control forage aeschynomene in that crop. Forage aeschynomene might become a weed problem in rice if plants are past the seedling stage when flood water is applied and could cause weed problems in soybeans; but, in most situations, cultural and chemical control practices should provide adequate control.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Albrecht, S. L., Bennett, J. M., and Quesenberry, K. H. 1981. Growth and nitrogen fixation of Aeschynomene under water stressed conditions. Plant Soil 60:309315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Javier, J. J. 1985. Effects of flooding on seven species of tropical pasture legumes. Anal. Trop. Res. 5:91101.Google Scholar
3. Kalmbacher, R. S., Martin, F. G., and Teem, D. 1983. Univ. Fla. Weed Sci. Rep., p. 5355.Google Scholar
4. Miller, I. L., and Williams, W. T. 1981. Tolerance of some tropical legumes to six months of simulated waterlogging. Trop. Grassl. 15:3943.Google Scholar
5. Rudd, V. E. 1955. The American species of Aeschynomene . Contrib. U.S. Natl. Herbarium 32 (Part I), Bull. U.S. Natl. Museum (Smithsonian Inst), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
7. Thro, A. M. 1988. Collection and characterization of germplasm resources of the forage legume Aeschynomene americana in Louisiana. Trop. Grassl. 22:150159.Google Scholar
8. Thro, A. M., and Shock, C. C. 1987. Performance of subtropical forage legumes in southcentral USA. Trop. Agric. 64:297304.Google Scholar