Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:51:53.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Management in Southeastern Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with AC 263,222

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John S. Richburg III
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Univ. Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Univ. Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
Daniel L. Colvin
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Florida, IFAS, Gainesville, FL, 32611
Gerald R. Wiley
Affiliation:
Agric American Cyanamid Co., Tifton, GA 31794

Abstract

Field experiments conducted at four locations in Georgia and two locations in Florida during 1992 and 1993 evaluated AC 263,222 application rates and timings, systems, and mixtures for weed control, peanut injury, and yield. All rates of AC 263,222 applied early POST (EPOST) or POST controlled Ipomoea morningglories and smallflower morningglory at least 90%, and purple and yellow nutsedge at least 81%. Florida beggarweed and sicklepod control generally was highest when metolachlor was applied PPI followed by AC 263,222 applied EPOST at 71 g/ha, AC 263,222 at 27 or 36 g/ha plus bentazon plus paraquat applied POST, or with bentazon plus paraquat applied EPOST followed by AC 263,222 applied POST at 36 or 53 g/ha. Acifluorfen and acifluorfen plus bentazon reduced Florida beggarweed and sicklepod control at several locations when applied in mixture with AC 263,222. Common ragweed and hairy indigo control were 85 to 95% with bentazon plus paraquat applied EPOST followed by AC 263,222 applied POST at 36 or 53 g/ha. Highest peanut yields were obtained with treatments providing high levels of weed control.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, S. M. 1992. Imazethapyr (Pursuit) in peanuts; Observations in Georgia from the first year. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:104.Google Scholar
2. Dowler, C. D. 1992. Weed survey-southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:430464.Google Scholar
3. Grichar, W. J. 1992. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 6:108112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Grichar, W. J., Nester, P. R., and Colburn, A. E. 1992. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:396400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:317321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1993. Toxicity of imazethapyr to purple (Cyperus rotundas) and yellow (C. esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol. 7:900905.Google Scholar
7. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. Toxicity of AC 263,222 to purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow (C. esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Sci. 42:398402.Google Scholar
8. Sorenson, V. W., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1987. The interaction of acifluorfen and bentazon in herbicidal combinations. Weed Sci. 35:449456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Wehtje, G, Wilcut, J. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1992. Influence of bentazon on the phytotoxicity of paraquat to peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) and associated weeds. Weed Sci. 40:9095.Google Scholar
10. Wesley, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenylether herbicides with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:345351.Google Scholar
11. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and MuGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems for peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:385391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Rev. Weed Sci. 6:177205.Google Scholar
13. Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Eastin, E. F., Wiley, G. R., Walls, F. R. Jr., and Newell, S. 1994. Imazethapyr and paraquat systems for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 42:601607.Google Scholar
14. Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G., Jones, S. R., and Iverson, M. J. 1994. Imidazolinone herbicide systems for peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 21:2328.Google Scholar
15. Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G., and Newell, S. 1994. Timing intervals for paraquat + bentazon and AC 263,222 in Georgia peanut. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 47:225.Google Scholar
16. Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1996. Postemergence AC 263,222 systems for weed control in peanut. Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
17. York, A. C. and Wilcut, J. W. 1995. Potential for Pursuit and Cadre applied to peanuts to carryover to cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 1:602.Google Scholar
18. Young, J. H., Person, N. K., Donald, J. O., and Mayfield, W. H. 1982. Harvesting, curing, and energy utilization. p. 458487 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar