Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:28:50.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Chlorsulfuron and CGA 131036 and Comparison of Modes of Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Tracy E. Klingaman  and
Thomas F. Peeper
Tracy E. Klingaman
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field experiments, chlorsulfuron and CGA 131036 did not injure winter wheat. Both herbicides applied postemergence at 9 and 10 g ai/ha completely controlled flixweed. CGA 131036 controlled cutleaf eveningprimrose 81%, and chlorsulfuron controlled 91%. At similar rates, CGA 131036 was also less effective than chlorsulfuron on henbit and Italian ryegrass. Both controlled wild buckwheat 77% when applied postemergence at 18 g/ha. Neither of the sulfonylurea herbicides controlled prostrate spurge or woolly croton as effectively as 2,4-D. In a bean root bioassay, root growth inhibition by both herbicides was partially alleviated by adding isoleucine and valine.

Keywords

2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidbean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.flixweed, Descurainia sophia (L.)Webb. ex Prantl ♯3 DESSOcutleaf eveningprimrose, Oenothera laciniata Hill ♯ OEOLAhenbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. ♯ LAMAMwild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. ♯ POLCOItalian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam. ♯ LOLMUwoolly croton, Croton capitatus Michx. ♯ CVNCPprostrate spurge, Euphorbia humistrata Engelm. ex Gray ♯ EPHHTPhaseolus vulgarisDescurainia sophiaOenothera laciniataLamium amplexicaulePolygonum convolvulusLolium multiflorumCroton capitatusEuphorbia humistratabioassayLAMAMDESSOOEOLAPOLCOLOLMUCVNCPEPHHT
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 490 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brewster, B. D., and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.Google Scholar
2. Giardina, M. C., Agazio, M D., and Grego, S. 1987. Lack of prevention of chlorsulfuron induced inhibition by amino acids. Weed Res. 27:215–219.Google Scholar
3. Griffin, J. L. 1985. Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34:98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hoagland, D. R., and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 547.Google Scholar
5. Hoagland, R. E., and Duke, S. O. 1982. Biochemical effects of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]. p. 175–205 in Moreland, D. E., St. John, J. B., and Hess, F. D., ed. Biochemical responses induced by herbicides. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hutchison, J. M., Shapiro, R., and Sweetser, P. B. 1984. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by tolerant broadleaves. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 22:243–247.Google Scholar
7. Palm, H. L., Riggleman, J. D., and Allison, D. A. 1980. Worldwide review of the new cereal herbicide – DPX 4189. Proc. 1980 Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 2:1–6.Google Scholar
8. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: A new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:10–17.Google Scholar
9. Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron: Inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75:827–831.Google Scholar
10. Rubin, B., and Casida, J. E. 1985. R-25788 effects on chlorsulfuron injury and acetohydroxyacid synthase activity. Weed Sci. 33:462–468.Google Scholar
11. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchison, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: Biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:18–23.Google Scholar
12. Swisher, B. A., and Weimer, M. R. 1986. Comparative detoxification of chlorsulfuron in leaf disks and cell cultures of two perennial weeds. Weed Sci. 34:507–512.Google Scholar
13. Van't hof, J. 1968. Control of cell progression through the mitotic cycle by carbohydrate provision. I. Regulation of cell division in excised plant tissue. J. Cell Biol. 37:773–780.Google Scholar
14. Walker, A., and Brown, P. A. 1983. Measurement and prediction of chlorsulfuron persistence in soil. Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 30:365–372.Google Scholar
15. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
16. White, P. R. 1943. A handbook of plant tissue culture. Jaques Cattell Press, Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar
17. Zannow, E. W. 1982. Analysis of the herbicide chlorsulfuron in soil by liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31:854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar