Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:14:35.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Population Dynamics Following a Single Year's Seed Rain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert G. Hartzler
Robert G. Hartzler*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At a northern Iowa location, populations of 145, 203, 62, and 37 velvetleaf plants/m2 emerged in the four years following seed production by 0.4 velvetleaf plants/m2 growing in soybean. Annual velvetleaf densities in areas with no seed input averaged less than 6 plants/m2. At a central Iowa location, verticillium wilt reduced velvetleaf seed production, resulting in an average increase of 9 plants/m2 in the two years following seed production compared to the control treatment. This type of information is necessary to develop economic optimum thresholds, but the variability between locations demonstrates the difficulty in predicting crop and weed responses to management strategies implemented early in the growing season.

Keywords

Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medikus ♯3ABUTHcorn, Zea mays L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Tillageweed seedbank
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 581 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bauer, T. A. and Mortensen, D. A. 1991. A comparison of economic and economic optimum thresholds for two annual weeds in soybeans. Weed Technol. 6:228–235.Google Scholar
2. Bauer, T. A., Mortensen, D. A., Wicks, G. A., Hayden, T. A., and Martin, A. R. 1991. Environmental variability associated with economic thresholds for soybeans. Weed Sci. 39:564–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bello, I. A., Owen, M. D. K., and Hatterman-Valenti, H. M. 1995. Weed Technol. 9:452–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) density and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Buhler, D. D. and Gunsolus, J. L. 1996. Effect of date of preplant tillage and planting on weed populations and mechanical weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
6. Coble, H. D. and Mortenson, D. A. 1992. The threshold concept and its application to weed science. Weed Technol. 6:191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cousens, R. 1987. Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot. Q. 2:13–20.Google Scholar
8. Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1990. Decline of weed seeds and seedling emergence over five years as affected by soil disturbance. Weed Sci. 38:504–510.Google Scholar
9. Gunsolus, J. L. 1990. Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. Am. J. Alt. Agric. 5:114–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hartzler, R. G. and Roth, G. W. 1993. Effect of prior year's weed control on herbicide effectiveness in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:611–614.Google Scholar
11. Horowitz, M. and Taylorson, R. B. 1985. Behavior of hard and permeable seeds of Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (velvetleaf). Weed Res. 25:363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Khedir, K. D. and Roeth, F. W. 1981. Velvetleaf seed populations in six continuous corn fields. Weed Sci. 29:485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Lindquist, J. L. 1994. Population dynamics and economics of velvetleaf in a corn-soybean rotation. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul. 73 p.Google Scholar
14. Lueshen, W. E., Anderson, R. N., Hoverstad, T. R., and Kanne, B. K. 1993. Seventeen years of cropping systems and tillage affect velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seed longevity. Weed Sci. 41:82–86.Google Scholar
15. Maxwell, B. D. and Ghersa, C. 1992. The influence of weed seed dispersion versus the effect of competition on crop yield. Weed Technol. 6:196–204.Google Scholar
16. Mortensen, D. A., Martin, A. R., Roeth, F. W., Harvill, T. E., Klein, R. W., Wicks, G. A., Wilson, R. G., Holshouser, D. L., and McNamara, J. W. 1993. NebraskaHERB: Computer-aided postemergence weed management. Coop. Exten. Div., Univ. Nebraska. Lincoln.Google Scholar
17. Salzman, F. P., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. 1988. Suppression of red rice (Oryza sativa) seed production with fluazifop and quizalofop. Weed Sci. 36:800–803.Google Scholar
18. Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying soil moisture conditions. Agron. J. 50:13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Wilkerson, G. G., Modena, S. A., and Coble, H. D. 1991. HERB: Decision model for postemergence weed control in soybean. Agron. J. 83:413–417.Google Scholar
20. Zanin, G. and Sattin, M. 1988. Threshold level and seed production of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medikus) in maize. Weed Res. 28:347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar