Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:38:20.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Triazine-Resistant Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) Control in Field Corn (Zea mays L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark G. Myers
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

Abstract

Field studies were conducted near Beechwood, WI in 1986 and Sturgeon Bay, WI in 1987 and 1988 to evaluate herbicide treatments for control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (TR-CHEAL) in corn. AH PRE and many early postemergence (EP) and POST treatments were less effective in 1988 than in 1986 or 1987 due to drought. Atrazine, cyanazine, and metolachlor PRE controlled less than 15% TR-CHEAL late-season over the three years. Dicamba or pendimethalin applied PRE controlled 88 to 99% late-season TR-CHEAL in 1986 and 1987. Late-season TR-CHEAL control in 1986 and 1987 from acetochlor plus atrazine, alachlor plus atrazine, and metolachlor plus linuron applied PRE ranged from 58 to 86%. Pendimethalin plus cyanazine or atrazine applied EP controlled TR-CHEAL 97% or more late-season in 1986 and 1987, while pendimethalin plus dicamba plus atrazine applied EP controlled TR-CHEAL 97% or more each year. Late-season TR-CHEAL control from tridiphane plus cyanazine or atrazine EP was less than 58%. Late-season TR-CHEAL control from dicamba, 2,4-D amine, pyridate, and thifensulfuron applied POST was 87 to 99% each year, and was 94 to 99% in 1986 and 1987 from bromoxynil or bentazon applied POST. Dicamba, thifensulfuron, pendimethalin, pyridate, and 2,4-D amine were most effective in controlling TR-CHEAL in corn.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. p. 930 in Le Baron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds., Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
2. Doll, J. D. and Visocky, M. 1986. Results of the 1986 survey on perennial weeds. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:6774.Google Scholar
3. Fuerst, E. P., Barrett, M., and Penner, D. 1986. Control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and two pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34: 440443.Google Scholar
4. Hahn, R. R. 1984. Triazine resistant weeds in New York state. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:8788.Google Scholar
5. LeBaron, H. M. and McFarland, J. 1990. Herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. p. 336352 in Green, M. B., LeBaron, H. M., and Moberg, W. K., ed., Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals from Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Parochetti, J. V., Schnappinger, M. G., Ryan, G. F., and Collins, H. A. 1982. Practical significance and means of control of herbicide-resistant weeds. p. 309323 in Le Baron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds., Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar