Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:28:19.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Hybrids to RPA 201772

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lee R. Van Wychen ,
R. G. Harvey ,
Thomas L. Rabaey  and
David J. Bach
Lee R. Van Wychen*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. G. Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Thomas L. Rabaey
Affiliation:
Pillsbury Agricultural Research, LeSueur, MN 56058-1447
David J. Bach
Affiliation:
Pillsbury Agricultural Research, LeSueur, MN 56058-1447
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies at Arlington, WI, and LeSueur, MN, were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate tolerance of six sweet corn hybrids to RPA 201772 applied preemergence at 79 to 210 g/ha. Both years the most sensitive hybrid at the Wisconsin site was ‘Zenith,’ with yield reductions of 14 and 22% at 210 g/ha (twice the labeled rate). ‘Excellency,’ ‘Green Giant 43,’ and ‘Jubilee’ tolerated RPA 201772 at 158 g/ha or less. The least tolerant hybrids in Minnesota were ‘Green Giant 6′ and Jubilee, and the most tolerant hybrids were Green Giant 43 and ‘Rogers 9056.’ Injury from RPA 201772 increased as application dose increased. The greatest risk of injury from RPA 201772 appear to be with Green Giant 6, Zenith, and Jubilee, especially on coarser textured soils with low organic matter. Excellency, Green Giant 43, and Rogers 9056 appeared to be the most tolerant. Because of the differential hybrid response to RPA 201772 across sites and years, more hybrid response data needs to be generated before RPA 201772 is labeled in sweet corn.

Keywords

RPA 201772 (proposed common name, isoxaflutole), 5-cyclopropyl-isoxazol-4-yl-2-mesyl-4-trifluoromethylphenyl ketone, sweet corn, Zea mays L.Crop toleranceplant heightcrop injurypreemergenceherbicidesAP, at plantingDAP, days after plantingPRE, preemergenceSD, standard deviation
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 221 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1944. Atrazine pesticides; use restrictions. Chapter ATCP 30. Wis. Dep. Agric Trade Consumer Prot. Register 459:125–128.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998a. Minnesota Ag News. Vegetables. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Agricultural Statistics Service. 4 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998b. Wisconsin Vegetable Report. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics Service. 1 p.Google Scholar
Ashton, F. M. and Monaco, T. J. 1991. Vegetable crops. pp. 362–382 in Ashton, F. M. and Monaco, T. J., eds. Weed Science Principles and Practices. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. A. and Gorski, S. F. 1989. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) endosperm mutants to chloroacetamide and thiocarbamate herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:475–478.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Prostak, R. G. 1997. Comparison of preemergence activity of EXP 31130A in annual weed control under conventional-tillage and no-tillage systems. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:4.Google Scholar
Boerboom, C. M. 1997. Sweet corn herbicide evaluation at Hancock. Pp. B34–B35 in Binning, L. K., Boerboom, C. M., Doll, J. D., Harvey, R. G., Hopen, H. J., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Connell, T. R., eds. Wisconsin Weed Control Results. Volume 27. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Departments of Agronomy and Horticulture.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. E., Stoltenberg, D. E., Lowery, B., and Binning, L. K. 1997. Influence of application rate on atrazine fate in a silt loam soil. J. Environ. Qual. 26:829–835.Google Scholar
Kelling, K. A., Bundy, L. G., Combs, S. M., and Peters, J. B. 1997. Soil Test Recommendations for Field, Vegetable, and Fruit Crops. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Extension UWEX Publ. A2809. 71 p.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. M., Pallett, K. E., Loubiere, P., Millet, J. C., Melgarejo, J., and Vrabel, T. E. 1995. RPA 201772 a novel herbicide for broadleaf and grass control in maize and sugarcane. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 1:35–42.Google Scholar
Morton, C. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1992. Sweet corn (Zea mays) hybrid tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:91–96.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. R., Slack, C. H., Martin, J. R., and Witt, W. W. 1995. Evaluations of EXP31130A—a new preemergence corn herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:25–26.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., Brammall, R. A., and Bouw, W. J. 1994. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivars to nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:58–62.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Veerasekaran, P., and Viviani, F. 1997. Inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase: the mode of action of the herbicide RPA 201772 (isoxaflutole). Pestic. Sci. 50:83–84.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1997. Sweet corn (Zea mays) hybrids respond differently to simulated imazethapyr carryover. Weed Technol. 11:92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabaey, T. L., Bach, D. J., and Seibel, H. D. 1998. Sweet corn hybrid tolerance to isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:16.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., Schulthesis, J. R., and Worsham, A. D. 1993. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to application timing of nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:840–843.Google Scholar
Rosen, C. and Eliason, R. 1996. Nutrient Management for Commercial Fruit and Vegetable Crops in Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension Service Publ. BU-5886-GO. 34 p.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1998. Preemergence weed control and corn tolerance in conventional and no-tillage corn with isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:8.Google Scholar
Stall, W. M. and Bewick, T. A. 1992. Sweet corn cultivars respond differently to the herbicide nicosulfuron. HortScience 27:131–133.Google Scholar
Vrabel, T. E., Jensen, J. O., Wrucke, M. A., and Hicks, C. 1995. EXP31130A: a new preemergent herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:24–25.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Simmons, F. W. 1998. Performance of preemergence applications of isoxaflutole in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:8.Google Scholar