Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:12:30.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suppression of Caucasian Old World Bluestem with Split Application of Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Keith R. Harmoney ,
Phillip W. Stahlman  and
Karen R. Hickman
Keith R. Harmoney*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
Karen R. Hickman
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Caucasian old world bluestem (OWB), seeded for conservation and forage production, has escaped into rangelands in the southern and central Great Plains. Glyphosate, imazapic, imazapyr, imazethapyr, and sulfometuron methyl herbicides were applied at the four- to five-leaf stage and again 8 wk later in 2003 and 2005 to control Caucasian OWB. Glyphosate at 1.14 kg ai/ha at each application was the only treatment that reduced frequency and tiller density of Caucasian OWB, and also controlled over 80% of growth, at 6 wk after the first treatment (WAT) both years. After the first autumn frost, plots treated with glyphosate and imazapyr at 0.28 kg ai/ha at each application had lower frequency and much greater suppression of Caucasian OWB growth than plots treated with other herbicides. Tiller densities and seedhead densities were also less in plots treated with glyphosate and imazapyr compared to other herbicides and the nontreated control. Biomass at the end of the season was near zero for plots treated with glyphosate and imazapyr in 2003, and 26 to 46% of the nontreated control biomass in 2005. Frequency of Caucasian OWB the year following treatment was less than 5% for both glyphosate and imazapyr. Broadcast application of glyphosate and imazapyr also controlled remnant native vegetation in plots, thus different application methods, such as ropewick application, may be useful to avoid native grass injury.

Keywords

Glyphosateimazapicimazapyrimazethapyrsulfometuron methylCaucasian old world bluestem, Bothriochloa bladhii Retz (S.T. Blake) BOTBLBiomassfrequencynative vegetationold world bluestemsuppressiontiller density
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 573 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Brejda, J. J., Brown, J. R., and Hoenshell, C. L. 1995. Indiangrass and Caucasian bluestem responses to different nitrogen sources and rates in the Ozarks. J. Range Manage. 48:172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, D. 1984. The effect of temperature on the activity and metabolism of glyphosate applied to rhizome fragments of Elymus repens . Pestic. Sci. 15:226–234.Google Scholar
Coyne, P. I. and Bradford, J. A. 1985. Morphology and growth in seedlings of several 4-carbon pathway perennial grasses. J. Range Manage. 38:504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabo, S. M., Taliaferro, C. M., Coleman, S. W., Horn, F. P., and Claypool, P. L. 1988. Chemical composition of old world bluestem grasses as affected by cultivar and maturity. J. Range Manage. 41:40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, H. V. and Sims, P. L. 1984. Grass species adaptability in the southern high plains, Texas USA: a 36 year assessment. J. Range Manage. 37:211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmoney, K. R. and Hickman, K. R. 2004. Comparative morphology of Caucasian old world bluestem and native grasses. Agron. J. 96:1540–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmoney, K. R., Stahlman, P. W., and Hickman, K. R. 2004. Herbicide effects on established yellow old world bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum). Weed Technol. 18:545–550.Google Scholar
Launchbaugh, J. L. 1971. Upland Seeded Pastures Compared for Grazing Steers at Hays, Kansas. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 548. 29.Google Scholar
Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:133–137.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, T. J. and Anderson, V. L. 1993. Design of Experiments: A No-Name Approach. New York Marcel Dekker. 414.Google Scholar
Medlin, C., Peeper, T. F., Stiegler, J. H., and Solie, J. B. 1998. Systems for returning conservation reserve program to wheat (Triticum aestivum) production. Weed Technol. 12:286–292.Google Scholar
Sakai, A., Allendorf, F., and Holt, J. et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. A., Voigt, P., and Jones, R. M. 1999. Yield and quality of warm-season grasses in central Texas. J. Range Manage. 52:145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute 1995. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 3rd ed, Volume 2. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 846.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. D. and Singh, M. 2001. Environmental factors affecting absorption and bio-efficacy of glyphosate in Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum). Crop Prot. 20:511–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1996. Impacts of introduced species in the United States. Consequences: Nat. Implic. Environ. Change 2:13–22.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, K. P. and Masters, R. A. 2001. Frequency grid—a simple tool for measuring grassland establishment. J. Range Manage. 54:653–655.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. D. and Shay, J. M. 1990. Competition, fire, and nutrients in a mixed-grass prairie. Ecology 71:1959–1967.Google Scholar