Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:02:42.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sulfentrazone Dissipation in a Tennessee Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

G. Anthony Ohmes
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Robert M. Hayes
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Thomas C. Mueller*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Sulfentrazone dissipation in soil was examined in field experiments in 1995, 1996, and 1997 at Knoxville, TN, on a Sequatchie loam soil. Sulfentrazone 50% disappearance time (DT50) varied from 24 to 113 d. Cotton injury was observed the year following sulfentrazone application when half-lives were ≥85 d. Sulfentrazone degradation under controlled laboratory conditions was slower in autoclaved soil than in nonautoclaved surface soil and subsurface soil, with DT50 of 198, 93, and 102 d, respectively. The difference due to autoclaving the soil implied that sulfentrazone degradation was influenced by both microbial and chemical mechanisms.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. J., Norris, A. E., and Hess, F. D. 1994. Synthetic organic chemicals that act through the porphyrin pathway. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. 559: 1833.Google Scholar
Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35: 865870.Google Scholar
Blumhorst, M. R. and Mueller, T. C. 1997. Quality control procedures in herbicide field dissipation studies. Weed Technol. 11: 832837.Google Scholar
Brown, B. A., Hayes, R. M., Tyler, D. D., and Mueller, T. C. 1994. Effect of tillage and cover crops on fluometuron adsorption and degradation under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 42: 629634.Google Scholar
Brown, B. A., Hayes, R. M., Tyler, D. D., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. Effect of long-term vetch (Vicia villosa) cover crop and tillage system on fluometuron dissipation from surface soil. Weed Sci. 44: 171175.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. 1965. Cation exchange capacity. In Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. 1st ed. Agronomy Monogr. 9. Madison, WI: Am. Soc. Agron. pp. 891901.Google Scholar
Cheng, H. H. 1990. Pesticides in the soil environment—an overview. In Pesticides in the Soil Environment. Madison, WI: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. pp. 18.Google Scholar
Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In Klute, A., ed. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Am. Soc. Agron. pp. 383411.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci. 45: 733738.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. 1998. Supplement to Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of Amercia. pp. 6769.Google Scholar
Hurle, K. and Walker, A. 1980. Persistence and its prediction. In Hance, R. J., ed. Interactions Between Herbicides and the Soil. New York: Academic Press. pp. 83122.Google Scholar
Leung, L. Y., Lyga, J. W., and Robinson, R. A. 1991. Metabolism and distribution of the experimental triazolone herbicide F6285. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39: 15091514.Google Scholar
McLean, E. O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirements. In Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbial Properties. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Am. Soc. Agron. pp. 199224.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Moorman, T. B., and Snipes, C. E. 1992. Effect of concentration, sorption, and microbial biomass on degradation of the herbicide fluometuron in surface and subsurface soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40: 25172522.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbial Properties. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Am. Soc. Agron. pp. 539579.Google Scholar
Ohmes, G. A., Mueller, T. C., and Hayes, R. M. 1998. Grass and broadleaf weed control with Canopy XL. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 51: 34.Google Scholar
Ohmes, G. A. and Mueller, T. C. 1999. Liquid chromatographic determination of sulfentrazone in soil. J. Ass. Off. Anal. Chem. 82: 12141216.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Costello, R. W., and King, C. A. 1995. Weed control programs with sulfentrazone in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:73.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R., and Frans, R. 1986. Effect of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) herbicide carryover on subsequent crops. Weed Sci. 34: 756760.Google Scholar
Veeh, R. H., Inskeep, W. P., and Camper, A. K. 1996. Soil depth and temperature effects on microbial degradation of 2,4-D. J. Environ. Qual. 25: 512.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. and Banks, P. A. 1994. Dissipation of chlorimuron in southern soils. Weed Sci. 42: 625628.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. S., Jordan, D. L., and Reynolds, D. B. 1996. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 10: 762765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. 1987. Herbicide persistence in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 3: 117.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., Grey, T. L., and Spratlin, C. E. 1997. Soil effects of sulfentrazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:224.Google Scholar