Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:42:04.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spiny Amaranth (Amaranthus spinosus L.) Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. James Grichar
W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Box 755, Yoakum, TX 77995
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eight POST herbicides were evaluated alone or in various mixtures for spiny amaranth control in peanut in 1991 and 1992. Acifluorfen alone or in combination with bentazon, lactofen alone, or 2,4-DB alone applied late POST controlled spiny amaranth more than 80% at an early season rating. Lactofen applied early POST and 2,4-DB applied late POST controlled more than 90% late season. Imazethapyr and AC 263,222 controlled 72 to 90% of spiny amaranth, whereas bentazon and pyridate failed to provide adequate control.

Keywords

AC 263,222, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidacifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidbentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidlactofen, (±)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl-5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoatepyridate, O-(6-chloro-3-phenyl-4-pyridazinyl S-octyl carbonothioate2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidspiny amaranth, Amaranthus spinosus L. # AMASP, peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.PostemergenceimazethapyrAC 263, 222acifluorfen2,4-DBbentazonpyridatelactofenAMASP
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 199 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Birschbach, E. D., Myers, M. G., and Harvey, R. G. 1993. Triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) control in field corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technol. 7:431–436.Google Scholar
2. Blackshaw, R. E. and Esau, R. 1991. Control of annual broadleaf weeds in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 5:532–538.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1983. Weeds and their control in peanuts. P. 206–249 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
4. Campbell, D. C. and Murray, D. S. 1991. Use of imazethapyr in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:119.Google Scholar
5. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.Google Scholar
6. Champness, S. and Morris, K. 1948. The population of buried viable weed seeds in relation to contrasting pasture and soil types. J. Ecol. 36:149–173.Google Scholar
7. Cole, T. A., Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Behavior of imazethapyr in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:639–644.Google Scholar
8. Correll, D. S. and Johnston, M. C. 1979. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas, 2nd ed. Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, p. 558.Google Scholar
9. Driver, T. and Oliver, L. R. 1985. Control of woolly croton (Croton capitatus) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:727–729.Google Scholar
10. Grichar, W. J. 1991. Sethoxydim and broadleaf herbicide interaction effects on annual grass control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 5:321–324.Google Scholar
11. Grichar, W. J. 1992. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 6:108–112.Google Scholar
12. Hicks, T. V., Wehtje, G. R., and Wilcut, J. W. 1990. Weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with pyridate. Weed Technol. 4:493–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1988. Recovery of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) following applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen. Weed Sci. 36:345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. P. 119–124 in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
15. MacDonald, G. E., Brecke, B. J., and Colvin, D. L. 1988. Evaluation of pyridate for postemergence weed control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:64.Google Scholar
16. Solymosi, P. and Lehoczki, E. 1989. Characterization of a triple (atrazine-pyrazon-pyridate) resistant biotype of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.). J. Plant Physiol. 134: 685–670.Google Scholar
17. Westerman, R. B. and Murray, D. S. 1992. Weed control in peanuts with Pursuit. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:111.Google Scholar
18. Wilcut, J. W. and Walls, F. R. 1989. Imazethapyr for broadleaf weed control in Virginia peanuts. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 21:57.Google Scholar
19. Wilcut, J. W. and Swann, C. W. 1990. Timing of paraquat applications for weed control in Virginia-type peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 38:558–562.Google Scholar
20. Wilcut, J. W., Swann, C. W., and Hagwood, H. B. 1990. Lactofen systems for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 4:819–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wilcut, J. W. 1991. Economic yield response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 5:416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar