Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:24:06.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Safe Lettuce Planting Intervals Following Herbicide Use on Fallow Beds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven A. Fennimore*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, Salinas, CA 93905
John S. Rachuy
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, Salinas, CA 93905
Jose A. Valdez
Affiliation:
D'Arrigo Brothers Company, Salinas, CA 93902
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Continuous planting of lettuce from December to September each year in the Salinas Valley of California requires preparation of raised fallow beds ready for planting. Application of soil residual herbicides during winter fallow periods controls weeds but must be used with caution because germinating lettuce seedlings are very sensitive to herbicide soil residues. Three herbicides were applied to fallow beds at about 90, 60, and 30 d before lettuce was seeded. Herbicides tested were flumioxazin at 71, 105, and 211 g ai ha−1, two formulations of oxyfluorfen each at 280 and 560 g ha−1, and carfentrazone at 36 g ha−1. Herbicide injury to lettuce was assessed by visual estimates, crop stand, and number and weight of marketable lettuce heads. The 71 g ha−1 rate of flumioxazin, both oxyfluorfen formulations, and carfentrazone did not injure seeded lettuce or reduce the number or weight of lettuce heads. Flumioxazin at 211 g ha−1 injured lettuce, reducing the number of marketable heads, and should not be used within 90 d of lettuce planting.

La siembra continua de lechuga romana de diciembre a septiembre de cada año en el Salinas Valley de California, requiere la preparación en barbecho de camas elevadas listas para la siembra. La aplicación de herbicidas residuales en el suelo durante el periodo de barbecho o descanso en invierno controla la maleza, pero debe usarse con precaución debido a que las plántulas de lechuga en germinación son muy sensibles a los residuos de herbicidas en el suelo. Se aplicaron tres herbicidas a las camas en barbecho a aproximadamente 90, 60 y 30 días antes de que la lechuga fuera sembrada. Los herbicidas evaluados fueron flumioxazina a 71, 105 y 211 g ia ha−1, dos formulaciones de oxyfluorfen cada una a 280 y 560 g ha−1, y carfentrazona a 36 g ha−1. El daño a la lechuga fue evaluado mediante estimaciones visuales, la plantación y el número y peso de las cabezas comerciables de lechuga. La dosis de flumioxazina a 71 g ha−1, ambas formulaciones de oxyfluorfen, y carfentrazona no dañaron la lechuga sembrada ni redujeron el número o peso de las cabezas. La flumioxazina a 211 g ha−1 dañó las plantas, reduciendo el número comercial de cabezas y no debe ser usado a menos de 90 días de la siembra de la lechuga romana.

Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aldrich, R. J. and Kremer, R. J. 1997. Principles in Weed Management. 2nd ed. Ames, IA Iowa State University Press. 455 p.Google Scholar
[CA-DPR] California Department of Pesticide Regulation 2009. 2008 Summary of Pesticide Use Report Data 2008. Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur08rep/comrpt08.pdf. Accessed: July 9, 2010.Google Scholar
[CDMS] Crop Data Management System 2010a. Chateau: specimen label. Valent USA Corp. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld6QH002.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2010.Google Scholar
[CDMS] Crop Data Management System 2010b. GoalTender: specimen label. Dow AgroSciences. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld6MH021.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2010.Google Scholar
[CDMS] Crop Data Management System 2010c. Goal 2XL: specimen label. Dow AgroSciences. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld5S1002.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2010.Google Scholar
[CDMS] Crop Data Management System 2010d. Shark EW label. FMC Corporation. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld7H7007.pdf. Accessed: May 8, 2010.Google Scholar
Felix, J. and Doohan, D. J. 2005. Response of five vegetable crops to isoxaflutole soil residues. Weed Technol. 19:391396.Google Scholar
Greenland, R. G. 2003. Injury to vegetable crops from herbicides applied in previous years. Weed Technol. 17:7378.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2010. Vegetable 2009 Summary. Washington, DC Agricultural Statistics Board, NASS USDA. 83 p.Google Scholar
Nimbal, C. I., Pedersen, J. F., Yerkes, C. N., Weston, L. A., and Weller, S. C. 1996. Phytotoxicity and distribution of sorgoleone in grain sorghum germplasm. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:13431347.Google Scholar
Ryder, E. J. 1999. Lettuce, endive and chicory. Oxon, UK CABI Publishing. 208 p.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. 458 p.Google Scholar
Smith, R. F., LeStrange, M., and Fennimore, S. A. 2007. Integrated weed management in lettuce. UC DANR Publication 3450. http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r441700111.html. Accessed: July 9, 2010.Google Scholar
Tickes, B. R. and Kerns, D. L. 1996. Lettuce injury from preplant and preemergence herbicides. University of Arizona Cooperative Extension. http://ag.arizona.edu/crops/vegetables/weeds/lettuceinjury.html. Accessed: May 8, 2010.Google Scholar
[UCVRIC] University of California Vegetable Research Information Center 1996. Iceberg lettuce production in California. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Publication 7215. http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/7215.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2010.Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture 1975. United States Standards for Grades of Lettuce. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5050274. Accessed July 2, 2010.Google Scholar