Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:28:14.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of Humified Organic Matter in Herbicide Adsorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Patrick J. Shea
Patrick J. Shea*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebr., Lincoln, NE 68583
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organic matter is the soil constituent most often associated with herbicide adsorption. Structural diversity makes humified organic material an ideal substrate for the adsorption of many pesticides, but variability in composition and distribution in situ complicates interpretation of its quantitative effect on adsorption. Variability in the adsorption distribution coefficient (KD) of a herbicide among soils often is due to differences in organic matter content and can be reduced by adjusting KD for soil organic carbon content and computing the organic carbon partition coefficient (Koc). Koc can be estimated from the octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) of organic compounds, but the correlation weakens as compound polarity increases. Koc also can be correlated with aqueous solubility if a correction is made for the melting point of compounds that are solids at 25 C. Relative adsorption can be estimated from parachor and molecular connectivity indices; but corrections are needed for polar compounds, and correlations with KD or Koc have been variable. Such predictive methods may be useful for broad classification purposes, but accurate extrapolation generally requires site-specific adsorption measurements. Empirical models which accommodate the multiple regression of organic matter content and other soil properties such as clay content, pH, and cation exchange capacity on herbicide adsorption can increase accuracy, but interpretation may be restricted to a small number of sites.

Keywords

KDKocKomKowparachormolecular connectivityregression
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 190 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, L. E. 1965. Organic carbon. in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agron. Monogr. 9:1367–1378.Google Scholar
2. Allison, L. E., Bollen, W. B., and Moodie, C. D. 1965. Total carbon. in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agron. Monogr. 9:1346–1366.Google Scholar
3. Bailey, G. W., and White, J. L. 1970. Factors influencing the adsorption, desorption, and movement of pesticides in soil. Res. Rev. 32:29–92.Google Scholar
4. Briggs, G. G. 1981. Adsorption of pesticides by some Australian soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 19:61–68.Google Scholar
5. Briggs, G. G. 1981. Theoretical and experimental relationships between soil adsorption, octanol-water partition coefficients, water solubilities, bioconcentration factors, and the parachor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:1050–1059.Google Scholar
6. Brown, D. S., and Flagg, E. W. 1981. Empirical prediction of organic pollutant sorption in natural sediments. J. Environ. Qual. 10:382–386.Google Scholar
7. Calvet, R. 1980. Adsorption-desorption phenomena. p. 1–30 in Hance, R. G., ed. Interactions Between Herbicides and Soil. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
8. Calvet, R., Terce, M., and Arvieu, J. C. 1980. Adsorption des pesticides par les sols et leur constituents. Ann. Agron. 31:125–162.Google Scholar
9. Chen, N. Y. 1976. Hydrophobic properties of zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. 80:60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Elabd, H., Jury, W. A., and Cliath, M. M. 1986. Spacial variability of pesticide adsorption parameters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20:256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Felsot, A., and Dahm, P. A. 1979. Sorption of organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides by soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:557–563.Google Scholar
12. Freundlich, H. 1926. Colloid and Capillary Chemistry, E. P. Hutton and Co., New York. p. 110–114.Google Scholar
13. Gerstl, Z., and Helling, C. S. 1987. Evaluation of molecular connectivity as a predictive method for the adsorption of pesticides by soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health B22:55–69.Google Scholar
14. Giles, C. H., MacEwan, T. H., Nakhwa, S. N., and Smith, O. 1960. Studies in adsorption. Part XI. A system of classification of solution adsorption isotherms, and its use in diagnosis of adsorption mechanisms and in measurement of specific surface areas of solids. J. Chem. Soc. 1960:3973–3993.Google Scholar
15. Green, R. E. 1985. Methods of estimating pesticide sorption coefficients for soils and sediments. p. 184–187 in DeCoursey, D. G., ed. Proc. Nat. Resour. Modeling Symp., Oct. 16–21, 1983, Pingree Park, CO.Google Scholar
16. Hamaker, J. W., and Thompson, J. M. 1972. Adsorption. p. 49–143 in Goring, C.A.I. and Hamaker, J. W., eds. Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
17. Hance, R. J. 1987. Some continuing uncertainties in knowledge of herbicide behaviour in the soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 110:195–202.Google Scholar
18. Hance, R. J. 1969. An empirical relationship between chemical structure and the sorption of some herbicides by soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 17:667–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Harper, S. 1988. Sorption of metribuzin in surface and subsurface soils of the Mississippi delta region. Weed Sci. 36:84–89.Google Scholar
20. Harter, R. D., and Aldrichs, J. L. 1969. Effects of acidity on reactions of organic acidamines with montmorillonite clay surfaces. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 33:859–863.Google Scholar
21. Hassett, J. J., Banwart, W. L., and Griffin, R. A. 1983. Correlation of compound properties with sorption characteristics of nonpolar compounds by soils and sediments: Concepts and limitations. p. 161–178 in Francis, C. W. and Auerbach, S. I., eds. Environment and Solid Wastes: Characterization, Treatment, Disposal. Butterworth, Woburn, MA.Google Scholar
22. Hassett, J. J., Banwart, W. L., Wood, S. G., and Means, J. C. 1981. Sorption of α-napthal. Implications concerning the limits of hydrophobic sorption. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Helling, C. S., and Dragun, J. 1981. Soil leaching tests for toxic organic chemicals. p. 43–88 in Protocols for environmental fate and movement of toxicants. Proc. Symp. AOAC 94th Annu. Meet., Oct. 21–22, 1980, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
24. Karickhoff, S. 1981. Semi-empirical estimation of sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments and soils. Chemosphere 10:833–846.Google Scholar
25. Kenaga, E. E. 1980. Predicted bioconcentration factors and soil sorption coefficients of pesticides and other chemicals. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 4:26–38.Google Scholar
26. Kenaga, E. E., and Goring, C. A. 1980. Relationship between water solubility, soil sorption, octanol-water partititioning and concentration of chemicals in biota. p. 78–115 in Parrish, P. and Hendricks, A., eds. Aquatic Toxicology, Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Spec. Tech. Publ. No. 707. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
27. Kier, L. B., and Hall, L. H. 1976. Molecular connectivity in chemistry and drug research. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
28. Lambert, S. M. 1967. Functional relationship between sorption in soil and chemical. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 15:572–576.Google Scholar
29. McCall, P. J., Swann, R. L., Laskowski, D. A., Unger, S. M., Vrona, S. A., and Dishburger, H. J. 1980. Estimation of chemical mobility in soil from liquid chromatographic retention times. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 24.190–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. McCarty, P. L., Reinhard, M., and Rittmann, B. E. 1981. Toxic organics in groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15:40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. McGowan, J. C. 1954. The physical toxicity of chemicals. IV. Solubilities, partition coefficients and physical toxicities. J. Appl. Chem. 4:41–47.Google Scholar
32. Mehlich, A. 1984. Photometric determination of humic matter in soils, a proposed method. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15:1417–1422.Google Scholar
33. Nicholls, P. H. 1988. Factors influencing entry of pesticides into soil water. Pestic. Soc. 22:123–137.Google Scholar
34. Peter, C. J., and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption and efficacy of trifluralin and butralin as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:861–867.Google Scholar
35. Quayle, O. R. 1953. The parachors of organic compounds. An interpretation and catalogue. Chem. Rev. 53:439–589.Google Scholar
36. Rao, P.S.C., and Davidson, J. M. 1980. Estimation of pesticide retention and transformation parameters required in non-point pollution models. p. 23–67 in Overcash, M. R. and Davidson, J. M., eds. Environmental Impacts of Nonpoint Source Pollution, Ann Arbor Sci. Publ., Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
37. Rao, P.S.C., Nkedi-Kizza, P., Davidson, J. M., and Ou, L. T. 1983. Retention and transformations of pesticides in relation to non-point source pollution from croplands. p. 126–134 in Schaller, F. W. and Bailey, G. W. Agricultural Management and Water Quality. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
38. Rao, P.S.C., Edvardsson, K.S.V., Ou, L. T., Jessup, R. E., Nkedi-Kizza, P., and Hornsby, A. G. 1986. Spacial variability of pesticide sorption and degradation parameters. p. 100–115 in Garner, R. C., Honeycutt, R. C., and Nigg, H. N., eds. Evaluation of Pesticides in Ground Water. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
39. Sabljic, A. 1987. On the prediction of soil sorption coefficients of organic pollutants from molecular structure: Application of molecular topology model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21:358–366.Google Scholar
40. SAS Institute. 1982. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 1982 Edition, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
41. Scheffer, F., and Ulrich, B. 1960. Humus and Humusdungung, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
42. Smith, C. N., Parrish, R. S., and Carsel, R. F. 1987. Estimating sample requirements for field evaluations of pesticide leaching. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 6:343–357.Google Scholar
43. Southworth, G. R., and Keller, J. L. 1986. Hydrophobic sorption of polar organics by low organic carbon soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 28:239–248.Google Scholar
44. Stevenson, F. J. 1972. Role and function of humus in soil with emphasis on adsorption of herbicides and chelation of micro-nutrients. Bioscience 22:643–650.Google Scholar
45. Stevenson, F. J. 1976. Organic matter reactions involving pesticides in soil. p. 180–207 in Kaufman, D. D., ed. Bound and Conjugated Pesticide Residues, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Streibig, J. C. 1979. Measured and predicted concentration of s-triazine in soil water. KGL Vet.-og Landbohojsk. Arsskr. 1980:47–56.Google Scholar
47. Streibig, J. C. 1982. Relationship between soil-applied pyrazon and content in soil solution. Weed Sci. 30:527–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Veith, G. D., Austin, N. M., and Morris, R. T. 1979. A rapid method for estimating log P for organic chemicals. Water Res. 13:43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Walker, A., and Crawford, R. V. 1968. The role of organic matter in adsorption of the triazine herbicides by soils. p. 91–108 in Isotopes and Radiation in Soil Organic Matter Studies. Proc. 2nd Symp., Inter. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
50. Weber, J. B., and Strek, H. J. 1983. Update on soil testing and herbicide rate recommendations. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 23:89.Google Scholar
51. Weber, J. B., Overcash, M. R., and Isaac, R. A. 1987. Making herbicide rate recommendations based on soil tests. Weed Technol. 1:41–45.Google Scholar
52. Weber, J. B., Shea, P. J., and Weed, S. B. 1986. Fluridone retention and release in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:582–588.Google Scholar