Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:28:57.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rice (Oryza sativa) Response to the Microencapsulated Formulation of Clomazone1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patrick K. Bollich ,
David L. Jordan ,
Douglas M. Walker  and
Ann B. Burns
Patrick K. Bollich
Affiliation:
Rice Research Station, P.O. Box 1429, Crowley, LA 70527
David L. Jordan*
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Douglas M. Walker
Affiliation:
Rice Research Station, Bastrop, LA 71220
Ann B. Burns
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, St. Joseph, LA 71366
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 in water-seeded and drill-seeded production systems to determine rice response to clomazone applied at rates ranging from 0.28 to 2.2 kg ai/ha on silt loam and silty clay soils. Clomazone-induced bleaching of rice seedlings was 15% or less when clomazone was applied at 0.28 or 0.56 kg/ha. Increasing the rate of clomazone increased bleaching in most experiments. Clomazone at 0.84 kg/ha or higher delayed seed head emergence in five of eight experiments. Clomazone at lower rates did not delay seed head emergence. Although clomazone at 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha did not reduce grain yield, clomazone at 0.84 and 1.1 kg/ha reduced grain yield in one experiment while clomazone at 1.7 and 2.2 kg/ha reduced yield in two experiments. The influence of soil type and seeding method on rice's tolerance to the microencapsulated formulation of clomazone could not be demonstrated in these experiments. Clomazone was more injurious in drill-seeded production than in water-seeded production.

Keywords

Clomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinonerice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Cypress’Crop injuryPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 89 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Published with permission of the Vice Chancellor and Director of Research, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70894.
Current address: Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620.

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, F. L. 1995. A consolidated approach to weed management in rice (final report). In Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Status 1994. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Ser. 446. pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. H. and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Comparison of single and multiple applications of propanil and residual herbicides in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 9: 153–157.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Bollich, P. K., Burns, A. B., and Walker, D. M. 1998a. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to clomazone. Weed Sci. 46: 374–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., McClelland, M. R., and Johnson, W. G. 1990. Integration of clomazone into cotton weed management systems. In Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod.-Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV. Jan. 9-14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN. p. 348.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Sanders, D. E. 1999. Weed management. In Hollier, C. A., ed. Louisiana Rice Production Manual. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. Pub. 2321. pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Miller, D. K., and Crawford, S. H. 1998b. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with soil-applied and postemergence herbicide programs. Weed Technol. 12: 69–73.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. R., Stringer, S. J., and Gage, E. V. 1998. Clomazone 3ME for control of grasses in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:220.Google Scholar
Riggle, B. D. and Penner, D. 1990. The use of controlled-release technology for herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 5: 1–14.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Hill, J. E. 1990. Weed control technology in U.S. rice. In Grayson, B. T., Green, M. B., and Coping, L. D., eds. Pest Management in Rice. Elsevier Sci. Public. Ltd., United Kingdom. pp. 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, J. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (Oryza sativa) weed control with soil applications of quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7: 600–604.Google Scholar
Van Valkenberg, J. W. 1983. Terminology, classification, and chemistry. In Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL. pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Baldwin, F. L., and Dillon, T. L. 1999. The potential for clomazone use in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 13: 390–393.Google Scholar