Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:52:44.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Endosperm Mutants to Chloracetamide and Thiocarbamate Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark A. Bennett
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Stanley F. Gorski
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210

Abstract

Cold stress and field studies were conducted to determine the effects of alachlor, metolachlor, butylate plus dichlormid, and EPTC plus dichlormid on germination and seedling vigor of 30 sweet corn cultivars with three commercially important endosperm mutants (su, se, and sh2). Seedling emergence from cool soils was best when treated with EPTC plus dichlormid and alachlor and was decreased 11% by metolachlor and butylate plus dichlormid. The se and sh2 endosperm mutants were injured the most by the herbicides. Plant size was reduced by the thiocarbamate herbicides but not by the chloracetamides.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Association of Official Seed Analysts. 1983. Seed vigor testing handbook – contribution no. 32, p. 7174. Handbook on Seed Testing, Beltsville, MD.Google Scholar
2. Bala Narsaiah, D., and Harvey, R. G. 1977. Differential responses of corn inbreds and hybrids to alachlor. Crop Sci. 17:657659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Churchill, G. A., and Andrew, R. H. 1984. Effects of two maize endosperm mutants on kernel maturity, carbohydrates, and germination. Crop Sci. 24:7684.Google Scholar
4. Courter, J. W., Rhodes, A. M., Garwood, D. L., and Mosely, P. R. 1988. Classification of vegetable corns. HortScience 23:449450.Google Scholar
5. Ellis, T. W., Wilson, H. P., Mascianica, M. P., and Janssen, K. A. 1983. Influence of metolachlor on sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata) growth and nutrient accumulation. Weed Sci. 31:342347.Google Scholar
6. Gorski, S. F. 1987. Results of weed control studies in vegetable crops. Hortic. Ser. 584, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus.Google Scholar
7. Ilnicki, R. D., Frye, D. M., Michieka, R. W., and Somody, C. N. 1978. Weed control in four varieties of sweet corn with atrazine and cyanazine in combination with metolachlor, alachlor, and pendimethalin. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:115116.Google Scholar
8. Masiunas, T. B., Call, R. E., and Shoemaker, W. H. 1987. The interaction of chloracetamides and planting date on the growth and yield of sweet corn genotypes. Hortic. Ser. 69, Ill. Agric. Exp. Stn., Champaign.Google Scholar
9. Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Drake, S. R. 1982. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) to alachlor, EPTC + R-25788, and vernolate + R-25788. Weed Sci. 30:446449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Pollock, B. M., and Toole, V. K. 1966. Imbibition period as the critical temperature sensitive stage in germination of lima bean seeds. Plant Physiol. 41:221229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Rowe, D. E., and Garwood, D. L. 1978. Effects of four maize endosperm mutants on kernel vigor. Crop Sci. 18:709712.Google Scholar
12. Waters, L. Jr., and Blanchette, B. L. 1983. Prediction of sweet corn field emergence by conductivity and cold tests. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108:778781.Google Scholar
13. Weed Science Society of America. 1978. Butylate, p. 8386, and EPTC, p. 210–213 in Herbicide Handbook. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar