Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:45:36.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivars to Metribuzin in the Field and Greenhouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. W. De Weese ,
L. M. Wax ,
W. C. Carlson  and
J. A. Ciarletta
W. W. De Weese
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Res. Agron., USDA-ARS, Univ. Ill., Urbana, IL 61801
L. M. Wax
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Res. Agron., USDA-ARS, Univ. Ill., Urbana, IL 61801
W. C. Carlson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., and Res. Agron., USDA-ARS, Univ. Ill., Urbana, IL 61801
J. A. Ciarletta
Affiliation:
Res. Dev. Planning, and Lab. Biolog., Mobay Corp., Box 4913, Kansas City, MO 64120
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental objectives were to assess metribuzin tolerance of predominately privately developed soybean cultivars and to evaluate a greenhouse screening procedure. In field results in 1982, ‘Vinton 81’, ‘Northrup King 1884’ and ‘L77-1863’ soybean cultivars were extremely sensitive to metribuzin at 0.56 kg/ha, averaging 34% injury. The other 45 cultivars showed no significant injury at the 0.56 kg/ha rate, from 9 to 46% injury at 1.4 kg/ha, and 18 to 72% injury at 2.2 kg/ha. In greenhouse hydroponic studies, these same three soybean cultivars were killed, while the other 45 cultivars were injured from 15 to 82%. A good agreement of greenhouse and field data was determined, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.82.

Keywords

Metribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5 (4H)-onesoybean, Glycine max (L.)Merr.Selectivitycrop tolerancehydroponics
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 566 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L., Edwards, C. J. Jr., and Hartwig, E. E. 1976. Screening soybeans for tolerance to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:351–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Coble, H. D., and Schrader, J. W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.Google Scholar
3. Eastin, E. F., Sij, J. W., and Craigmiles, J. P. 1980. Tolerance of soybean genotypes to metribuzin. Agron. J. 72:167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Edje, O. T., and Burris, J. S. 1971. Effects of soybean seed vigor on field performance. Agron. J. 63:536–538.Google Scholar
5. Edwards, C. J. Jr., Barrentine, W. L., and Kilen, T. C. 1976. Inheritance of sensitivity to metribuzin in soybeans. Crop Sci. 16:119–120.Google Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R., Bahrenfus, J. B., and Walker, A. K. 1984. Registration of Vinton 81 soybean. Crop Sci. 24:384.Google Scholar
7. Gossett, B. J., Morgan, L. F., and Murphy, T. R. 1982. Soybean plant damage and yields as affected by metribuzin and seed quality. Agron. J. 74:691–693.Google Scholar
8. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Bauman, T. T. 1980. Influence of herbicide injury on the yield potential of soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 28:40–45.Google Scholar
9. Hanson, P. M. 1984. Evaluation of inheritance of metribuzin sensitivity in soybeans. MS. thesis. Univ. Ill. p. 810, 16.Google Scholar
10. Hardcastle, W. S. 1974. Differences in the tolerance of metribuzin by varieties of soybeans. Weed Res. 14:181–184.Google Scholar
11. Hardcastle, W. S. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar response to metribuzin in solution culture. Weed Sci. 27:278–279.Google Scholar
12. Johnson, R. R., and Wax, L. M. 1979. Soybean stand establishment and yield as affected by herbicides and cultural practices. Agron. J. 71:880–884.Google Scholar
13. Kilen, T. C., and Barrentine, W. L. 1983. Linkage relationships in soybean between genes controlling reactions to phytophthora rot and metribuzin. Crop Sci. 23:894–896.Google Scholar
14. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of pH on metribuzin activity in the soil. Weed Sci. 24:505–507.Google Scholar
15. Littlejohns, D. A., Allen, W. R., and Pitblado, R. E. 1977. Effects of metribuzin on the performance of soybean cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:551–554.Google Scholar
16. Mangeot, B. L., Slife, F. E., and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci. 27:267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Moshier, L. J., and Russ, O. G. 1981. Metribuzin injury in soybeans as influenced by application timing and cultivation. Agron. J. 73:677–679.Google Scholar
18. Payne, R. C., and Koszykowski, T. J. 1977. Differentiation of soybean cultivars by metribuzin sensitivity. J. Seed Technol. 2:1–9.Google Scholar
19. Wax, L. M. 1977. Incorporation depth and rainfall on weed control in soybeans with metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:484–486.Google Scholar
20. Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bernard, R. L. 1976. Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:484–486.Google Scholar