Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:59:40.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Red Morningglory (Ipomoea Coccinea) Control with Foliar- and Soil-Applied Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Curtis A. Jones  and
James L. Griffin
Curtis A. Jones
Affiliation:
Lee F. Mason Louisiana State University Alumni Association Professor, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin*
Affiliation:
Lee F. Mason Louisiana State University Alumni Association Professor, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted to evaluate residual activity of herbicides applied postemergence (POST) and preemergence (PRE) for red morningglory control. Atrazine at 2.24 kg ai/ha controlled 30- to 60-cm red morningglory 78% 10 d after treatment (DAT) but control was greater for carfentrazone at 0.035 kg ai/ha, diuron plus hexazinone at 1.57 + 0.44 kg ai/ha, flumioxazin at 0.14 kg ai/ha, and sulfentrazone at 0.32 kg ai/ha (88 to 93%). At 28 DAT control with diuron plus hexazinone, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone, reflective of both the initial POST control and soil residual activity, was equivalent to that of atrazine at 3.36 kg/ha (92%), but control was 34 to 66% with carfentrazone at 0.009, 0.018, and 0.026 kg/ha, hexazinone at 0.56 kg/ha, pyraflufen at 0.007 and 0.015 kg ai/ha, and trifloxysulfuron at 0.016 kg ai/ha. In another study to evaluate residual control with soil-applied herbicides, red morningglory was controlled at least 87% 35 DAT with atrazine at 2.24 kg/ha, diuron plus hexazinone at 1.57 + 0.44 kg/ha, flumioxazin at 0.14 kg/ha, sulfentrazone at 0.16 kg/ha, and metribuzin at 1.68 kg ai/ha. Control 35 DAT was 78% for atrazine at 1.12 kg/ha, 84% for diuron plus hexazinone at 1.05 + 0.30 kg/ha, and 63% for flumioxazin at 0.07 kg/ha. By 49 DAT only sulfentrazone controlled red morningglory 80% or more and by 63 DAT, control with sulfentrazone at rates of 0.21 kg/ha and higher was 83 to 88%. At 77 DAT sulfentrazone at 0.21 kg/ha controlled red morningglory 78% and no other herbicide treatment provided more than 46% control. In another study red morningglory control did not change from 49 to 63 DAT when sulfentrazone at 0.28 to 0.42 kg/ha was applied PRE following trifluralin preplant incorporated (PPI), but control decreased from 49 to 63 DAT when sulfentrazone was incorporated with trifluralin.

Keywords

Atrazinediuroncarfentrazoneflumioxazinhexazinonemetribuzinpyraflufensulfentrazonetrifloxysulfurontrifluralinred morningglory, Ipomoea coccinea L.Foliar-applied herbicidesherbicide combinationslayby weed control programssoil-applied herbicidessugarcane
Type
Weed Management — Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 402 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2005. Louisiana Summary Agricultural and Natural Resources. http://www.lsuagcenter.com/agsummary/index.aspx. Accessed: June 26, 2007.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2006. Louisiana's Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide for 2006. http://www.lsuagcenter.com/NR/rdonlyres/F71B2A47-E904-4740-AF51-2216E6F1DD62/21004/06WEEDGUIDE.pdf. Accessed: June 26, 2007.Google Scholar
Cole, A. W. and Coats, G. E. 1973. Tall morningglory germination response to herbicides and temperature (Ipomoea purpurea). Weed Sci. 21:443–446.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two- and three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egley, G. H. 1990. High temperature effects on germination and survival of weed seeds in soil. Weed Sci. 38:429–435.Google Scholar
Gomes, L. F., Chandler, J. M., and Vaughan, C. E. 1978. Aspects of germination, emergence, and seed production of three Ipomoea taxa. Weed Sci. 26:245–248.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L., Viator, B. J., and Ellis, J. M. 2000. Tie-vine (morningglory) control at layby. Sugar Bull. 78:23–35.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Bollero, G. A., and Stoller, E. W. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, W. S. 1978. Influence of temperature and acid scarification duration on scarlet morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) seed germination. Weed Sci. 26:261–263.Google Scholar
Jones, C. A., Griffin, J. L., Etheredge, L. M. Jr, and Judice, W. E. 2006. Response of red morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea L.) to shade and soil applied herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:3.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1988. Control of morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) in sugarcane with layby herbicide treatments. J. Am. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 8:62–66.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. L., Sanders, D., Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., Burch, T. A., Boudreaux, J. E., Puls, E. E., and Richard, E. P. Jr. 1996. Potential Economic Impact of Loss of Triazine Herbicides in Louisiana. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station Report. OPP-30000-60. 9.Google Scholar
Saxton, A. M. 1998. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Pages 1243–1246. in. Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International, Nashville, TN, March 22–25. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Siebert, J. D., Griffin, J. L., and Jones, C. A. 2004. Red morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) control with 2,4-D and alternative herbicides. Weed Technol. 18:38–44.Google Scholar
Thakar, C. and Singh, H. N. 1954. Nilkalamine (Ipomoea hederacea), a menace to sugarcane. Hort. Abstr. 24:530.Google Scholar
Viator, B. J., Griffin, J. L., and Richard, E. P. Jr. 2002a. Evaluation of red morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) for potential atrazine resistance. Weed Technol. 16:96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viator, B. J., Griffin, J. L., and Ellis, J. M. 2002b. Red morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) control with sulfentrazone and azafeniden applied at layby in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Weed Technol. 16:142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:247–274.Google Scholar