Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:47:42.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proactive Versus Reactive Management of Glyphosate-Resistant or -Tolerant Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas C. Mueller ,
Paul D. Mitchell ,
Bryan G. Young  and
A. Stanley Culpepper
Thomas C. Mueller*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Paul D. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The value of glyphosate has been compromised in some fields where weed populations have developed resistance or tolerant species increased. Three case studies related to reduced control from glyphosate are: (1) a weed population that has become resistant to glyphosate, with horseweed in Tennessee as an example; (2) a weed population increases due to lack of control in “glyphosate only” systems, with tropical spiderwort in Georgia cotton used as an example; and (3) the hypothetical resistance of common waterhemp to glyphosate in Illinois. For each of these case studies, an economic analysis was performed using a partial budget approach. This economic analysis provides the cost of control to the farmer when glyphosate fails to control these weeds and gives a critical time in years to compare different glyphosate resistance management philosophies (applicable only before resistance has evolved). The cost of glyphosate-resistant horseweed in cotton-soybean-corn rotation in Western Tennessee was calculated to be $30.46/ha per year. The cost of tropical spiderwort in cotton in southern Georgia was calculated to be $35.07/ha per year. The projected cost if common waterhemp were to develop glyphosate resistance in a corn-soybean rotation in southern Illinois was projected to be $44.25/ha per year, and the critical time was determined to be greater than 20 yr, indicating that a resistance management strategy would extend the value of glyphosate-resistant crops.

Keywords

glyphosatecommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer. # AMATAhorseweed, Conyza canadensis L. Cronq # ERICAeconomic analysisherbicide costherbicide resistanceALS, acetolactate synthaseCmanaging, economic cost of managing resistanceCresistance, economic cost of resistanceGR, glyphosate resistantNPV, net present valueNPVproactive, net present value of proactive resistance managementNPVreactive, net present value of reactive managementPPO, protoporphyrinogenoxidaseRresistance, net economic return once resistance has occurredRwithout, net economic return without resistanceTcritical, time at which net present value for reactive and proactive resistance management are equalTresistance, time at which resistance occurs
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 924 - 933
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K. and Peterson, D. 1999. Soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift from selected drift from selected sulfonylurea herbicides, dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 13:264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerson, S. R., Rodriguez, D. J., Tran, M., Feng, Y. M., Biest, N. A., and Dill, G. M. 2002. Glyphosate-resistant goosegrass. Identification of a mutation in the target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. Plant Physiol. 129:1265–1275.Google Scholar
Baumann, R. S. 1998. Resistance to the herbicide glyphosate. Nature 395:25–26.Google Scholar
Baylis, A. D. 2000. Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses, and prospects. Pest Man Sci. 56:299–308.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:642–647.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Thomas, W. E., Pline-Srnic, W. A., Fisher, L. R., Smith, W. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2005. Yield and physiological response of flue-cured tobacco to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technol. 19:255–260.Google Scholar
Chiang, A. 1984. Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Technology Information Center. 2004. Conservation tillage and plant biotechnology: How new technologies can improve the environment by reducing the need to plow. Web page: http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/Biotech.html. Accessed April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Flanders, J. T., York, A. C., and Webster, T. M. 2004. Tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) control in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 18:432–436.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. M. and Griffin, J. L. 2002. Soybean (Glycine max) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simluated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 16:580–586.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. M., Griffin, J. L., and Jones, C. A. 2002. Effect of carrier volume on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 16:587–592.Google Scholar
Faden, R. B. 1993. The misconstrued and rare species of Commelina (Commelinaceae) in the eastern United States. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:208–218.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., MacDonald, G. E., and Brecke, B. J. 2004. Tropical spiderwort (Commelina bengalensis L.), identification and control. Florida Cooperative Extension Service SS-AGR-223. Web page: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/BODY_AG230. Accessed: April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Liu, L., Tranel, P. J., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1998. A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci. 46:514–520.Google Scholar
Georghiou, G. P. 1994. The principles of insecticide resistance. Phytoprotection 75:51–59.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G., Buhler, D. D., and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1999. Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci. 47:578–584.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bollero, G. A. 2002. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean. Weed Sci. 50:607–610.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2004. Number of observed weed resistant biotypes for varying herbicide families. Web page: http://www.weedscience.org/ChronMOA.GIF. Accessed: April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. E. and Street, J. E. 2003. Response of rice (Oryza sativa) to glyphosate applied to simulated drift. Weed Technol. 13:264–270.Google Scholar
Lee, L. J. and Ngim, J. 2000. A first report of glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica L. Gaertn) in Malaysia. Pest Man. Sci. 56:336–339.Google Scholar
Lessley, B. V., Johnson, D., and Hanson, J. 1991. Using the partial budget to analyze farm change. University of Maryland Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet FS-547. Web page: http://www.agnr.umd.edu/MCE/Publications/PDFs/FS547.pdf. Accessed: April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
Lovell, S. T., Wax, L. M., Horak, M. J., and Peterson, D. E. 1996. Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea resistance in a biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci. 44:789–794.Google Scholar
Mager, H. J., Young, B. G., and Al-Khatib, K. 2002. Management of common waterhemp resistant to protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicides in soybean. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 57:70.Google Scholar
Magin, R. W. 2003. Glyphosate: Twenty-eight years and still growing—The discovery, development, and impact of this herbicide on the agrichemical industry. 23rd International Symposium, ASTM STP 1449; G. Volgas, R. Downer, and H. Lopez, Eds. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
Main, C. L., Hayes, R. M., and Mueller, T. C. 2004a. Emergence patterns and early-season control options for horseweed in mid-south agriculture. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:5.Google Scholar
Main, C. L., Mueller, T. C., Hayes, R. M., and Wilkerson, J. B. 2004b. Response of selected horseweed (Conyza canadensis L. cronq) populations to glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:879–883.Google Scholar
Neve, P., Diggle, A. J., Smith, F. P., and Powles, S. B. 2003. Simulating evolution of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum II: Past, present and future glyphosate use in Australian cropping. Weed Res. 43:418–427.Google Scholar
Ng, C. H., Wickneswari, R., Salmijah, S., Teng, Y. T., and Ismail, B. S. 2003. Gene polymorphisms in glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica from Malaysia. Weed Res. 43:108–115.Google Scholar
Onstad, D. W., Crowder, D. W., Mitchell, P. D., Guse, C. A., Spencer, J. L., Levine, E., and Gray, M. E. 2003. Economics versus alleles: balancing IPM and IRM for rotation-resistant Western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 96:1872–1885.Google Scholar
Orson, J. H. 1999. The cost to the farmer of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 13:607–611.Google Scholar
Owen, M. D. K. 2000. Current use of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybean and corn in the USA. Crop Prot. 19:765–771.Google Scholar
Perez, A. and Kogan, M. 2003. Glyphosate-resistant Lolium multiflorum in Chilean orchards. Weed Res. 43:12–19.Google Scholar
Pimental, D. C., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R., and Blair, R. 1995. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267:1117–1123.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Dellow, J. J., and Preston, C. 1998. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia. Weed Sci. 46:604–607.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B. and Preston, C. 2006. Evolved glyphosate resistance in plants: biochemical and genetic basis of resistance. In press.Google Scholar
Scott, R., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1998. Lyphosate tank mixtures with SAN 582 for burndown or postemergence applications in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:23–26.Google Scholar
Shoup, D. E., Al-Khatib, K., and Peterson, D. E. 2003. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 51:145–150.Google Scholar
Smeda, R. J. and Schuster, C. L. 2002. Waterhemp resistance to glyphosate: Fact or fiction? North Central Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 57:209.Google Scholar
Smith, D. A. and Hallett, S. G. 2003. Measurement of glyphosate resistance in waterhemp. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 58:98.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Horak, M. J. 1997. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:192–197.Google Scholar
Staub, T. and Sozzi, D. 1984. Fungicide resistance: a continuing challenge. Plant Dis. 68:1026–1031.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E., Sprague, C. L., and Hager, A. G. 2002. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in corn (Zea mays) with single preemergence and sequential applications of residual herbicides. Weed Technol. 16:755–761.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. E., Burke, I. C., Robinson, B., Pline-Srnic, W. A., Edmisten, K. L., Wells, R., and Wilcut, J. W. 2005. Yield and physiological response of nontransgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to simulated drift. Weed Technol. 19:35–42.Google Scholar
Trower, T. and Boerboom, C. 2004. Wisconsin crop manager: 2004 herbicide price list. Web page: http://ipcm.wisc.edu/wcm/pdfs/2004/new04Price.pdf. Accessed April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2000. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Federal noxious weed list. Web page: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/permits/fnwsbycat-e.PDF. Accessed April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2004. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Agricultural Chemical Use Database. Web page: http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass. Accessed April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service. 2004. Department of Agricultural Economics Budgets. Web page: http://economics.ag.utk.edu/budgets.html. Accessed April 6, 2005.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703–705.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 2001. Glyphosate in double-crop notill glyphosate-resistant soybean: role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol. 15:703–713.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. 2001. The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis . Can. J. Plant Sci. 81:867–875.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:244–248.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. and MacDonald, G. E. 2001. A survey of weeds in various crops in Georgia. Weed Technol. 15:771–790.Google Scholar