Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:23:31.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential Corn Yield Losses from Weeds in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
J. Anita Dille
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Ian C. Burke
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Wesley J. Everman
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Mark J. VanGessel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE
Vince M. Davis
Affiliation:
BASF, Madison, WI
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Crop losses from weed interference have a significant effect on net returns for producers. Herein, potential corn yield loss because of weed interference across the primary corn-producing regions of the United States and Canada are documented. Yield-loss estimates were determined from comparative, quantitative observations of corn yields between nontreated and treatments providing greater than 95% weed control in studies conducted from 2007 to 2013. Researchers from each state and province provided data from replicated, small-plot studies from at least 3 and up to 10 individual comparisons per year, which were then averaged within a year, and then averaged over the seven years. The resulting percent yield-loss values were used to determine potential total corn yield loss in t ha−1 and bu acre−1 based on average corn yield for each state or province, as well as corn commodity price for each year as summarized by USDA-NASS (2014) and Statistics Canada (2015). Averaged across the seven years, weed interference in corn in the United States and Canada caused an average of 50% yield loss, which equates to a loss of 148 million tonnes of corn valued at over U.S.$26.7 billion annually.

Las pérdidas de cultivos debido a la interferencia de malezas tiene un efecto económico significativo en la rentabilidad neta de los productores. Aquí se documentan las pérdidas potenciales en el rendimiento de maíz debido a la interferencia de malezas a lo largo de las principales regiones productoras de maíz de los Estados Unidos y de Canada. Los estimados de pérdida de rendimiento fueron determinadas a partir de observaciones cuantitativas comparativas entre el rendimiento de maíz sin tratamiento y con tratamientos que brindaran un control de malezas superior al 95% en estudios realizados desde 2007 hasta 2013. Los investigadores de cada estado y provincia proveyeron datos de estudios replicados con parcelas pequeñas con al menos 3 y hasta 10 comparaciones por año, las cuales fueron promediadas dentro de cada año, y luego promediadas por los siete años. El porcentaje de pérdida de rendimiento resultante fue usado para determinar la pérdida total de rendimiento del maíz en t ha−1 y bu acre−1 con base en el promedio de rendimiento del maíz para cada estado o provincia, y el precio del maíz para cada año según USDA-NASS (2014) y Statistics Canada (2015). Al promediar los siete años, la interferencia de malezas en el maíz en Estados Unidos y Canada causó en promedio un 52% de pérdida de rendimiento, lo que equivale a una pérdida de 142 millones de toneladas de maíz valorado en más de U.S.$26,722 millones anualmente.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate editor for this paper: Jason Bond, Mississippi State University.

References

Literature Cited

Bridges, DC (1992) Crop losses due to weeds in Canada and United States. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society America Weed Loss Committee. 403 pGoogle Scholar
Chandler, JM, Hamill, AS, Thomas, AG (1984) Crop losses due to weeds in Canada and the United States. Champaign, IL: WSSA special publication Google Scholar
Cramer, HH (1967) Plant protection and world crop production. Pflanzenschutz Nachr Bayer 20: 1524 Google Scholar
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2012) Maize Production, FAOSTAT Online Statistical Service. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed March 14, 2016Google Scholar
Harker, KN (2001) Survey of yield losses due to weeds in central Alberta. Can J Plant Sci 81: 339342 Google Scholar
Oerke, EC (2006) Centenary review—crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144: 3143 Google Scholar
Oerke, EC, Dehne, HW, Schonbeck, F, Weber, A (1994) Crop Production and Crop Protection: Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V. 808 p Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2015) Corn: Canada's Third Most Valuable Crop http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/96-325-x/2014001/article/11913-eng.htm. Accessed March 25, 2016Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Harker, KN, Anderson, RL (1993) Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technol 7: 537542 Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2014) Total Herbicide Applied, and the Proportion of US Corn Acres Treated with Herbicides, 1990 to 2014. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Chemical_Use/2014_Corn_Highlights/index.asp. Accessed March 10, 2016Google Scholar
Walker, PT (1983) Crop losses: the need to quantify the effects of pests, diseases and weeds on agricultural production. Agric Ecosyst Environ 9: 119158 Google Scholar
Walker, PT (1987) Losses in yield due to pests in tropical crops and their value in policy decision-making. Insect Sci Appl 8: 665671 Google Scholar