Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:27:56.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimizing Glyphosate Timing in a Mixed Stand of Glyphosate-Resistant/Conventional, Drill-Seeded Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plant Sciences, Clemson University, 277 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634-0315
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant soybean at 494,000 seeds/ha was drill seeded with conventional soybean at 0 to 1,976,000 seeds/ha, and conventional soybean controlled at 2, 4, or 6 wk after soybean emergence with glyphosate at 0.84 kg ae/ha. Weed control increased exponentially with soybean groundcover prior to treatment with glyphosate and was maximized at 69 and 84% for Palmer amaranth and Florida pusley, respectively. When glyphosate was applied 2 wk after soybean emergence, yields were improved 390 kg/ha at 494,000 glyphosate-resistant soybean plus 247,000 conventional soybean seeds/ha compared with glyphosate-resistant soybean alone. Further increases in seeding rate of the conventional soybean often had a negative effect on soybean yields due to interference between glyphosate-resistant and conventional soybean prior to applying glyphosate. Glyphosate applied 6 wk after soybean emergence was generally less effective in controlling Palmer amaranth and Florida pusley than at earlier timings because of weed size at application and the overlying soybean canopy. This research indicates the mix-seeded soybean system may suppress early-season weeds, but glyphosate needs to be applied no later than 4 wk after soybean emergence to ensure optimum yields and prevent interference between glyphosate-resistant and conventional soybean.

Keywords

GlyphosatePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. # AMAPAFlorida pusley, Richardia scabra L. # RCHSCsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrApplication timingintegrated weed managementsoybean groundcovertransgenic cropWAEweeks after soybean emergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 942 - 946
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Technical Contribution No. 5018 of the Clemson University Experiment Station.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2004. Roundup UltraMax label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld3HB027.pdf. Accessed: March 4, 2005.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Gimenez, A. E., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) control with glyphosate and 2,4-DB mixtures in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:56–61.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed-survey-southern states. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 51:299–313.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Stage of soybean development. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Special Rep. 80. 12 p.Google Scholar
Gimenez, A. E., York, A. C., Wicut, J. W., and Batts, R. B. 1998. Annual grass control by glyphosate plus bentazon, chlorimuron, fomesafen, or imazethapyr mixtures. Weed Technol. 12:134–136.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., and Clay, P. A. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Poston, D. H., and Reddy, K. N. 2004. Effect of glyphosate spray coverage on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomeoa lacunosa). Weed Technol. 18:124–130.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:12–21.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Renner, K. A. 1997. Weed control using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in narrow and wide row soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 10:431–437.Google Scholar
Murdock, E. C. and Sherrick, S. 1999. Florida pusley (Richardia scabra) control in Roundup ReadyTM soybeans. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 52:57–58.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2003. Use of soybean production surveys to determine weed management needs of South Carolina farmers. Weed Technol. 17:186–189.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Frederick, J. R. 2002. Reduced seeding rate for glyphosate-resistant, drilled soybean on the southeastern Coastal Plain. Agron. J. 94:1282–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2001a. Competitive potential and economic analysis of a glyphosate-resistant/conventional soybean mix. Weed Technol. 15:177–183.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2001b. Effect of seeding rate of drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glyince max) on seed yield and gross profit margin. Weed Technol. 15:284–292.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2002. Effect of irrigation, soybean (Glycine max) density, and glyphosate on hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference in soybean. Weed Technol. 16:7–17.Google Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 2000. Weed control programs in drilled glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Weed Technol. 14:413–422.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. C., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:478–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yelverton, F. H. and Coble, H. D. 1991. Narrow row spacing and canopy formation reduces weed resurgence in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar