Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:39:01.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) and Large Crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) Control with Glyphosate and 2,4-DB Mixtures in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

A. Stanley Culpepper ,
Agustin E. Gimenez ,
Alan C. York ,
Roger B. Batts  and
John W. Wilcut
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, P.O. Box 1209, Tifton, GA 31793
Agustin E. Gimenez
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York*
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, P.O. Box 1209, Tifton, GA 31793
Roger B. Batts
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate effectively controls most weeds in glyphosate-resistant soybean. However, it is sometimes only marginally effective on Ipomoea spp. A field experiment was conducted at five locations in North Carolina to determine the effects of mixing 2,4-DB with glyphosate on Ipomoea spp. control and on soybean injury and yield. The isopropylamine salt of glyphosate at 560, 840, and 1,120 g ai/ha controlled mixtures of tall morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, and red morningglory at least 96% at two locations. Mixing the dimethylamine salt of 2,4-DB at 35 g ae/ha with glyphosate did not increase control but reduced soybean yield 6%. At two other locations, 2,4-DB increased control of tall morningglory and a mixture of entireleaf morningglory and ivyleaf morningglory 13 to 22% when mixed with glyphosate at 560 g/ha, but not when mixed with glyphosate at 840 or 1,120 g/ha. Soybean yield was reduced 31% at one location and was unaffected at the other. At the fifth location, 2,4-DB increased control of tall morningglory 25, 11, and 7% when mixed with glyphosate at 560, 840, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively. Soybean yield was increased 15%. In separate field experiments, glyphosate at 560, 840, and 1,120 g/ha controlled large crabgrass at least 99%. Mixing 2,4-DB at 35 g/ha with glyphosate did not affect control. In the greenhouse, mixing 2,4-DB at 35, 70, 140, or 280 g/ha with glyphosate at 70 to 560 g/ha did not affect large crabgrass control by glyphosate.

Keywords

Glyphosate2,4-DBentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray #3 IPOHGivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHElarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAred morningglory, Ipomoea coccinea L. # IPOCCtall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHBPUsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Hartz 5566 RR’Herbicide combinationsherbicide interactionsherbicide-resistant cropsWATweeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 56 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, M. A., Thompson, L. Jr., and Godley, F. M. 1984a. Control of annual morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32: 813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, M. A., Thompson, L. Jr., and Patterson, R. P. 1984b. Effect of 2,4-DB on soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32: 299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14: 77–88.Google Scholar
Draper, N. and Smith, H. 1981. Introduction to nonlinear estimation. In Applied Regression Analysis. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 458–529.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Hurst, H. R., and Austin, D. F. 1990. Biology and control of morningglories (Ipomoea spp.). Rev. Weed Sci. 5: 83–114.Google Scholar
Flint, J. L. and Barrett, M. 1989. Antagonism of glyphosate toxicity to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) by 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Sci. 37: 700–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimenez, A. E., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Batts, R. B. 1998. Annual grass control by glyphosate plus bentazon, chlorimuron, fomesafen, or imazethapyr mixtures. Weed Technol. 12: 134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, J. H. 1986. Performance of combinations of 2,4-DB with new postemergence broadleaf and grass herbicides in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39: 84–85.Google Scholar
Howe, O. W. III and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) row spacing on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference. Weed Sci. 35: 185–193.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 12–21.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and O'Donovan, J. T. 1980. Interactions between glyphosate and various herbicides for broad-leaved weed control. Weed Res. 10: 255–260.Google Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1999. Herbicide programs in drilled Roundup Ready soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:42.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. B., Jordan, D. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Griffin, J. L. 1995. Broadleaf weed control with trifluralin plus flumetsulam in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9: 446–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selleck, E. W. and Baird, D. D. 1981. Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 29: 185–190.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3: 155–181.Google Scholar
Tingle, C. H., Shaw, D. R., and Hall, J. 1996. Timing and rate of Roundup in Roundup-Ready soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:55.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Wilcut, J. W., and Monks, C. D. 1995. Efficacy and economy of weed management systems for sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9: 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. C., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 478–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehtje, G. R. and Walker, R. H. 1997. Interactions of glyphosate and 2,4-DB for the control of selected morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) species. Weed Technol. 11: 152–156.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Coble, H. D., York, A. C., and Monks, D. W. 1996. The potential niche for herbicide-resistant crops in U.S. agriculture. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. New York: CRC Press and Lewis Publications. pp. 213–230.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14: 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Grichar, W. J. 1993. Interaction of 2,4-DB with postemergence gramincides. Peanut Sci. 20: 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., Keene, M. M., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1991. Soybean (Glycine max) response to postemergence herbicide mixtures containing 2,4-DB. Weed Technol. 5: 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar