Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:17:07.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metribuzin-Resistant Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) in Bermudagrass Turf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James T. Brosnan ,
Roy K. Nishimoto  and
Joseph DeFrank
James T. Brosnan*
Affiliation:
Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii, 3190 Maile Way #102, Honolulu, HI 96822
Roy K. Nishimoto
Affiliation:
Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii, 3190 Maile Way #102, Honolulu, HI 96822
Joseph DeFrank
Affiliation:
Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii, 3190 Maile Way #102, Honolulu, HI 96822
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Applications of metribuzin plus MSMA have been used to control goosegrass in bermudagrass turf for over 20 yr. In 2003, two goosegrass biotypes on the island of Kauai, Hawaii were found to be resistant to applications of metribuzin plus MSMA. Metribuzin plus MSMA applied at rates of 0.28 kg ai/ha plus 2.2 kg/ha, respectively, followed by MSMA at 2.2 kg/ha 7 d later, provided 100% control of two susceptible goosegrass biotypes, but no control of two resistant biotypes. At the flowering growth stage, metribuzin applied at a rate of 0.28 kg/ha controlled both susceptible biotypes (> 92%), but did not control the two resistant biotypes. Two applications of MSMA applied at a rate of 2.2 kg/ha (7 d apart) did not control any of the four biotypes at the flowering growth stage. The two resistant biotypes were approximately 100 to 200 times less sensitive to increasing rates of metribuzin than the two susceptible biotypes. The two biotypes that were resistant to metribuzin plus MSMA were also resistant to applications of simazine plus MSMA. However, all four biotypes were susceptible to applications of glyphosate and foramsulfuron.

Keywords

GlyphosateforamsulfuronmetribuzinMSMAsimazinebermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. CYNDAgoosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ELEINHerbicide resistant weedsturfgrasstriazine resistancecross resistance
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 675 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Brennan, B. M., Higashi, A. K., and Murdoch, C. L. 1992. Estimated Pesticide Use on Golf Courses in Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources Research Extension Series 137. 16.Google Scholar
Buker, R. S. III, Steed, S. T., and Stall, W. M. 2002. Confirmation and control of a paraquat-tolerant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) biotype. Weed Technol 16:309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busey, P. 2004. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control with foramsulfuron in bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.). Weed Technol 18:634–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Shukla, A. 2000. Altered target sites as a mechanism of herbicide resistance. Crop Prot 199:881–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. 2008. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: January 15, 2008.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1980. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf. Weed Sci 28:378–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G., Kirkwood, R. C., and Leach, G. E. 1994. Comparative studies on graminicide-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica . Weed Res 34:177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, J. S., Robinson, D. K., Samples, T., Sorochan, J. C., and Breeden, G. 2007. Weed Management Recommendations for Professional Turfgrass Managers: Athletic Fields, Golf Courses, Commercial Lawns and Turfgrass Sod. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service #PB1539. 54.Google Scholar
Mudge, L. C., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Resistance of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) to dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci 32:591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, C. L. and Ikeda, D. 1974. Goosegrass control in bermudagrass turf with combinations of MSMA with s-triazines. Agron. J. 66:712–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishimoto, R. K. and Kawate, M. K. 2003. Revolver effective for goosegrass. Hawaii Landsc 7:7.Google Scholar
Nishimoto, R. K. and Murdoch, C. L. 1999. Mature goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf with a metribuzin-diclofop combination. Weed Technol 13:169–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senseman, S. A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 159–160.Google Scholar
Teng, Y. T. and Teo, K. C. 1999. Weed control and management of resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) in Malaysia. Proc. Asian-Pac. Weed Sci. Soc. Conf 17:753–758.Google Scholar
Valverde, B. E., Chaves, L., Gonzales, J. G., and Garita, I. 1993. Field evolved imazapyr resistance in Ixophorus unisetus and Eleusine indica in Costa Rica. Pages 1189–1194. in. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. C., Vaughn, M. A., and Gossett, B. J. 1990. A biotype of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) with an intermediate level of dinitroaniline resistance. Weed Technol 4:157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, R. A. and Duncan, D. B. 1969. A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem. J. Am. Stat. Assoc 64:1484–1503.Google Scholar