Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:00:24.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaf Appearance Base Temperature and Phyllochron for Common Grass and Broadleaf Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Greta G. Gramig  and
David E. Stoltenberg
Greta G. Gramig*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
David E. Stoltenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Base temperature (Tb) for leaf appearance and the thermal time interval between appearance of successive leaves (phyllochron) were determined for six common weed species from a series of growth chamber experiments. Mean leaf appearance Tb values for giant ragweed, velvetleaf, redroot pigweed, large crabgrass, woolly cupgrass, and wild-proso millet were 1.3, 8.0, 8.5, 4.5, 2.2, and 5.1 C, respectively, and mean phyllochron values were 37.2, 34.4, 17.3, 42.2, 65.2, and 34.2 growing degree-days per leaf, respectively. Phyllochron values increased slightly with mean temperature for each weed species. To our knowledge, these are the first reported leaf appearance Tb and phyllochron values for giant ragweed, woolly cupgrass, and wild-proso millet. The results confirm leaf appearance Tb and phyllochron values reported previously for velvetleaf and redroot pigweed. However, large crabgrass leaf appearance Tb and phyllochron values in our study varied somewhat from those reported previously. The results provide information needed for parameterization of plant growth models that predict leaf development based on thermal time.

Keywords

Giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. AMBTRlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTHwild-proso millet, Panicum milliaceum L. PANMIwoolly cupgrass, Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth ERBVIGrowing degree-daysleaf areaphenologythermal time
Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 249 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alm, D. M., Pike, D. R., Hesketh, J. D., and Stoller, E. W. 1988. Leaf area development in some crop and weed species. Biotronics 17:29–39.Google Scholar
Arnold, C. Y. 1960. Maximum-minimum temperatures as a basis for computing heat units. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 76:682–692.Google Scholar
Bassett, I. J. and Crompton, C. W. 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:1003–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertero, D. H. 2001. Effects of photoperiod, temperature, and radiation on the rate of leaf appearance in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under field conditions. Ann. Bot. 87:495–502.Google Scholar
Bonnett, G. D. 1998. Rate of leaf appearance in sugarcane, including a comparison of a range of values. Aust. J. Plant Phys. 25:829–834.Google Scholar
Cao, W. 1995. Leaf emergence on potato stems in relation to thermal time. Agron. J. 87:474–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, W. and Moss, D. N. 1989. Temperature effect on leaf emergence and phyllochron in barley. Crop Sci. 29:1018–1021.Google Scholar
Craufurd, P. Q., Qi, A., Ellis, R. H., Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H., and Mahalakshmi, V. 1998. Effect of temperature on time to panicle initiation and leaf appearance in sorghum. Crop Sci. 38:942–947.Google Scholar
Deen, W., Hunt, T., and Swanton, C. J. 1998a. Influence of temperature, photoperiod, and irradiance on the phenological development of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Weed Sci. 46:555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, W., Hunt, L. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1998b. Photothermal time describes common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) phenological development and growth. Weed Sci. 46:561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramig, G. G., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Norman, J. M. 2006. Weed species radiation-use efficiency as affected by competitive environment. Weed Sci. 54:1013–1024.Google Scholar
Granier, C., Massonnet, C., Turc, O., Muller, B., Chenu, K., and Tardieu, F. 2002. Individual leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a stable thermal-time-based programme. Ann. Bot. 89:595–604.Google Scholar
Granier, C. and Tardieu, F. 1998. Is thermal time adequate for expressing the effects of temperature on sunflower leaf development? Plant Cell Environ. 21:695–703.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Balke, N. E. 1995. Absence of herbicide cross-resistance in two atrazine-resistant velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotypes. Weed Sci. 43:352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, G. L., Hill, K., and Schrodter, G. N. 1987. Leaf area production and senescence of diverse grain sorghum hybrids. Field Crops Res. 17:305–317.Google Scholar
Hatterman-Valenti, H., Bello, I. A., and Owen, M. D. K. 1996. The physiological basis of dormancy in woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa [Thunb.] Kunth). Weed Sci. 44:87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstra, G., Hesketh, J. D., and Myhre, D. L. 1977. A plastochron model for soybean leaf and stem growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1995. Plant responses to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Sci. 43:474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiniry, J. R. and Keener, M. E. 1982. An enzymatic kinetic equation to estimate maize development rates. Agron. J. 74:115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiniry, J. R., Rosenthal, W. D., Jackson, B. S., and Hoogenboom, G. 1991. Predicting the leaf development of crop plants. in Hodges, T., eds. Predicting Crop Phenology. Boca Raton, FL CRC. 29–42.Google Scholar
Kropff, M. J., Weaver, S. E., and Smits, M. A. 1992. The use of ecophysiological models for crop-weed interference, relative leaf area, and yield loss. Weed Sci. 40:296–301.Google Scholar
Massawe, F. J., Azam-Ali, S. N., and Roberts, J. A. 2003. The impact of temperature on leaf appearance in bambara groundnut landraces. Crop Sci. 43:1375–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. 1981. Climatic variation and the growth of crops. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 109:749–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. 1996. The quest for balance in crop modeling. Agron. J. 88:695–697.Google Scholar
Muchow, R. C. and Carberry, P. S. 1989. Environmental control of phenology and leaf growth in a tropically adapted maize. Field Crops Res. 20:221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1992. Temperature and canopy development of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, A., Wheeler, T. R., Keatinge, J. D. H., Ellis, R. H., Summerfield, R. J., and Craufurd, P. Q. 1999. Modelling the effects of temperature on the rates of seedling emergence and leaf appearance in legume cover crops. Exp. Agric. 35:327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. and NeSmith, D. S. 1991. Temperature and crop development. in Ritchie, J.T., Hanks, R.J., ed. Modeling Plant and Soil Systems. Madison, WI American Society of Agronomy. 5–27.Google Scholar
Ryel, R. J., Barnes, P. W., Beyschlag, W., Caldwell, M. M., and Flint, S. D. 1990. Plant competition for light analyzed with a multi species canopy model. Oecologia 82:304–310.Google Scholar
Sharpe, P. J. H. and DeMichele, D. W. 1977. Reaction kinetics of poikilotherm development. J. Theor. Biol. 64:647–670.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. 1984. Leaf area development in field-grown soybeans. Agron. J. 76:141–146.Google Scholar
Streck, N. A., Weiss, A., Xue, Q., and Baenziger, P. S. 2003. Incorporating a chronology response into the prediction of leaf appearance rate in winter wheat. Ann. Bot. 92:181–190.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Huang, J. Z., Shrestha, A., Tollenaar, M., Deen, W., and Rahimian, H. 2000. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on the phenological development of barnyardgrass. Agron. J. 92:1125–1134.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M., Daynard, T. B., and Hunter, R. B. 1979. Effect of temperature on rate of leaf appearance and flowering date in maize. Crop Sci. 19:363–366.Google Scholar
Villalobos, F. J. and Ritchie, J. T. 1992. The effect of temperature on leaf emergence rates of sunflower genotypes. Field Crops Res. 29:37–46.Google Scholar
Wagner, T. L., Wu, H., Sharpe, P. J. H., and Coulson, R. N. 1984a. Modeling distributions of insect development time: a literature review and application for the Weibull function. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77:475–483.Google Scholar
Wagner, T. L., Wu, H., Sharpe, P. J. H., Schoolfield, R. M., and Coulson, R. N. 1984b. Modeling insect development rates: a literature review and application of a biophysical model. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77:209–225.Google Scholar
Wang, J. Y. 1960. A critique of the heat unit approach to plant response studies. Ecology 41:785–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, I. J. and Kanemasu, E. T. 1983. Corn growth response to temperature and photoperiod II. Leaf-initiation and leaf-appearance rates. Agron. J. 75:755–761.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. M. and Binning, L. K. 1987. Calculating the threshold temperature of development for weeds. Weed Sci. 35:177–179.Google Scholar
Yan, W. and Hunt, L. A. 1999. An equation for modelling the temperature response of plants using only the cardinal temperatures. Ann. Bot. 84:607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, X. and Kropff, M. J. 1996. The effect of temperature on leaf appearance in rice. Ann. Bot. 77:215–221.Google Scholar