Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:54:11.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of quizalofop-p-ethyl mixed with contact herbicides in ACCase-resistant rice production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2019

Samer Y. Rustom ,
Eric P. Webster Open the ORCID record for Eric P. Webster [Opens in a new window] ,
David C. Blouin  and
Benjamin M. McKnight
Samer Y. Rustom
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Benjamin M. McKnight
Affiliation:
Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Eric P. Webster, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted in 2015 and 2016 near Crowley, LA, to evaluate antagonistic, synergistic, or neutral interactions of quizalofop when mixed with contact herbicides labeled for use in rice production. Quizalofop was applied at 120 g ai ha−1. Mixture herbicides included bentazon at 1,050 g ai ha−1, carfentrazone at 18 g ai ha−1, propanil at 3,360 g ai ha−1, saflufenacil at 25 g ai ha−1, and thiobencarb at 3,360 g ai ha−1. A second application of quizalofop at 120 g ha−1 was made at 28 d after the initial application (DAIT) to evaluate control of weeds escaping the initial treatment. At 14 and 28 DAIT, red rice, ‘CLXL-745’, and ‘CL-111’ treated with quizalofop plus propanil indicated an antagonistic response with an observed control of 69% to 71% compared with an expected control of 92% to 94%. Barnyardgrass treated with the same mixture also indicated an antagonistic response at 14 and 28 DAIT with an observed control of 16% compared with an expected control of 94%. Barnyardgrass treated with quizalofop plus saflufenacil indicated an antagonistic response at 14 DAIT; however, the same mixture produced a neutral response by 28 DAIT. In addition, a second application of quizalofop was not able to overcome the antagonism observed with a quizalofop plus propanil mixture at 14 and 28 DAIT for red rice, CLXL-745, CL-111, or barnyardgrass control. Quizalofop mixed with carfentrazone or thiobencarb produced a neutral response for all weeds evaluated at each evaluation date.

Keywords

Jason Bond, Mississippi State UniversityBentazoncarfentrazonepropanilquizalofopsaflufenacilthiobencarbbarnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.weedy rice, Oryza sativa L.rice, Oryza sativa L.Antagonismmixturepostemergence herbicideweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 233 - 238
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askew, SD, Shaw, DR, Street, JE (1998) Red rice (Oryza sativa) control and seedhead reduction with glyphosate. Weed Technol 12:504–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnwell, P, Cobb, AH (1994) Graminicide antagonism by broadleaf weed herbicides. Pest Sci 41:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenbaum, MC (1981) Criteria for analyzing interactions between biologically active agents. Adv Cancer Res 35:269–335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beste, CE (1983) Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 515 pGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, O’Donovan, JT (2006) Broadleaf herbicide effects on clethodim and quizalofop-p efficacy on volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 20:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2010) On a method of analysis for synergistic and antagonistic joint-action effects with fenoxaprop mixtures in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 24:583–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2008) Red rice (Oryza sativa) status after 5 years of imidazolinone-resistant rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, JD, Gronwald, JW, Somers, DA, Gengenbach, BG, Wyse, DI (1989) Inhibition of corn acetyl-CoA carboxylase by cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Pest Biochem Physiol 34:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, VF III, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2011) Imazethapyr plus propanil programs in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 25:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, SG, Nyuist, WE, Walker, WM (1989) Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigmiles, JP (1978) Introduction. in Eastin, EF, ed. Red Rice Research and Control. College Station, TX: Tex Agric Exp Stn Bull B-1270. Pp. 5–6Google Scholar
Croughan, TP, inventor; Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, Mechanical College, assignee (1999) September 14. Herbicide resistant rice. US patent 5,952,553Google Scholar
Croughan, TP (2003) Clearfield rice: it’s not a GMO. La Agric 46:24–26Google Scholar
De Wet, JM, Harlan, JR (1975) Weeds and domesticates: evolution in the man-made habitat. Econ Bot 29:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, RE (1980) Physiological interaction, its mathematical expression. Weed Sci 28:573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estorninos, LE Jr, Gealy, DR, Gbur, EE, Talbert, RE, McClelland, MR (2005) Rice and red rice interference. II. Rice response to population densities of three red rice (Oryza sativa) ecotypes. Weed Sci 53:683–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2015) Imazethapyr co-application interactions in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 29:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2016) Imazamox plus propanil mixtures for grass weed management in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 30:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focke, M, Lichtenthaler, HK (1987) Notes: inhibition of the Acetyl-CoA carboxylase of barley chloroplasts by cycloxydim and sethoxydim. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 42:1361–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, DR, Mitten, DH, Rutger, JN (2003) Gene flow between red rice (Oryza sativa) and herbicide-resistant rice (O. sativa): implications for weed management. Weed Technol 17:627–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, DR, Yan, W, Rutger, JN (2006) Red rice (Oryza sativa) plant types affect growth, coloration, and flowering characteristics of first- and second generation crosses with rice. Weed Technol 20:839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J, Valverde, BE (2009) A strategy to provide long-term control of weedy rice while mitigating herbicide resistance transgene flow, and its potential use for other crops with related weeds. Pest Manag Sci 65:723–731CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Bollero, GA, Stroller, EW (2003) Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max.). Weed Technol 17:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, KK, Penner, D (1985) Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev Weed Sci 1:1–63Google Scholar
Kwon, SL, Smith, RJ Jr, Talbert, RE (1992) Comparative growth and development of red rice (Oryza sativa) and rice. Weed Sci 40:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, MS, Burgos, NR, Talbert, RE (2010) Confirmation and control of propanil-resistant and quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in rice. Weed Technol 24:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, JA, Webster, EP (2001) Use of imazethapyr in water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 15:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, BW, Shaw, DR, Kurtz, ME (1989) Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 3:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, PM (1978) Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci 26:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, RG (1981) Phytotoxic interaction studies—techniques for evaluation and presentation of results. Weed Sci 29:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oard, J, Cohn, MA, Linscombe, SD, Gealy, GR, Gravois, K (2000) Field evaluation of seed production, shattering, and dormancy in hybrid populations of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) and the weed red rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Sci 157:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottis, BV, Mattice, JD, Talbert, RE (2005) Determination of antagonism between cyhalofop-butyl and other rice (Oryza sativa) herbicides in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Agric Food Chem 53:4064–4068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP (2004) Imazethapyr at different rates and timings in drill- and water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Technol 18:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2003) Herbicide mixtures in water-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:836–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajguru, SN, Burgos, NR, Shivrain, VK, Stewart, JM (2005) Mutations in the red rice ALS gene associated with resistance to imazethapyr. Weed Sci 53:567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Srivastava, V, Nandula, V, Bond, J A, Scott, RC (2013) Physiological and molecular basis of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicide resistance in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Agric Food Chem 61:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustom, SY, Webster, EP, Bergeron, EA, McKnight, BM (2015) Management of weedy rice utilizing crop rotation. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 69:108Google Scholar
Rustom, SY, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2018) Interactions between quizalofop-p-ethyl and acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in acetyl-coA carboxylase inhibitor-resistant rice production. Weed Technol 32:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 254–255Google Scholar
Shivrain, VK, Burgos, NR, Anders, MM, Rajguru, SN, Moore, J, Sales, MA (2007) Gene flow between Clearfield™ rice and red rice. Crop Protect 26:349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1965) Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern US rice, Oryza sativa. Weed Technol 2:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr, Hill, JE (1990) Weed control technology in U.S. rice. in Grayson, BT, Green, MB, Copping, LG, eds. Pest Management in Rice. London: Elsevier Science. Pp. 314–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streibig, JC, Kudsk, P, Jensen, JE (1998) A general joint action model for herbicide mixtures. Pestic Sci 53:21–283.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudianto, E, Beng-Kah, S, Ting-Xiang, N, Saldain, NE, Scott, RC, Burgos, NR (2013) Clearfield® rice: Its development, success, and key challenges on a global perspective. Crop Protect 49:40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, RE, Burgos, NR (2007) History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:324–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, PR, Reynolds, DB, Blouin, DC (1995) Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol 9:68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Carlson, TP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Imazethapyr plus residual herbicide programs for imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 26:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Teló, GM, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2017a) Imazethapyr plus propanil mixtures in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 32:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Teló, GM, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM, Bergeron, EA (2017b) Synergism with imazamox co-applications for red rice control. Weed Technol 31:373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Leon, CT (2005) Fenoxaprop interactions for barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice. Weed Technol 19:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar