Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:50:12.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration of residual herbicides with cover crop termination in soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2019

Derek M. Whalen Open the ORCID record for Derek M. Whalen [Opens in a new window] ,
Lovreet S. Shergill ,
Lyle P. Kinne ,
Mandy D. Bish  and
Kevin W. Bradley
Derek M. Whalen*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
Lovreet S. Shergill
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Fellow, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
Lyle P. Kinne
Affiliation:
Retired Senior Research Scientist, FMC Corporation, Ewing, NJ, USA
Mandy D. Bish
Affiliation:
Extension Weed Specialist, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
Kevin W. Bradley
Affiliation:
Professor, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Derek M. Whalen, BASF Agricultural Solutions, 320 County Road 1100 N, Seymour, IL 61875. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cover crops have increased in popularity in midwestern U.S. corn and soybean systems in recent years. However, little research has been conducted to evaluate how cover crops and residual herbicides are effectively integrated together for weed control in a soybean production system. Field studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to evaluate summer annual weed control and to determine the effect of cover crop biomass on residual herbicide reaching the soil. The herbicide treatments consisted of preplant (PP) applications of glyphosate plus 2,4-D with or without sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron at two different timings, 21 and 7 d prior to soybean planting (DPP). Cover crops evaluated included winter vetch, cereal rye, Italian ryegrass, oat, Austrian winter pea, winter wheat, and a winter vetch plus cereal rye mixture. Herbicide treatments were applied to tilled and nontilled soil without cover crop for comparison. The tillage treatment resulted in low weed biomass at all collection intervals after both application timings, which corresponded to tilled soil having the highest sulfentrazone concentration (171 ng g−1) compared with all cover crop treatments. When applied PP, herbicide treatments applied 21 DPP with sulfentrazone had greater weed (93%) and waterhemp (89%) control than when applied 7 DPP (60% and 69%, respectively). When applied POST, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicide resulted in greater weed and waterhemp control at 7 DPP (83% and 77%, respectively) than at 21 DPP (74% and 61%, respectively). Herbicide programs that included a residual herbicide had the highest soybean yields (≥3,403 kg ha−1). Results from this study indicate that residual herbicides can be effectively integrated either PP or POST in conjunction with cover crop termination applications, but termination timing and biomass accumulation will affect the amount of sulfentrazone reaching the soil.

Keywords

2,4-DchlorimuronglyphosatesulfentrazoneAustrian winter pea, Pisum sativum ssp. arvense (L.) Poircereal rye, Secale cereal L.corn, Zea mays L.Italian ryegrass, Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnotoat, Avena sativa L.waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer.winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.winter vetch, Vicia villosa Roth ssp. varia (Host) Corb.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Cover crop burndownresidue
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 11 - 18
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Aaron Hager, University of Illinois

References

Banks, PA, Robinson, EL (1982) The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci 30:164–168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, JP, Putnam, AR (1986) Evidence for allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye (Secale cereale). Weed Sci 34:384–390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, EB, Smith, RF (2005) Winter cover crop growth and weed suppression on the central coast of California. Weed Technol 19:1017–1024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, S, Nyquist, W, Walker, W (1989) Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two-or three-factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665–672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, CD, Bradley, KW (2017) Influence of various cover crop species on winter and summer annual weed emergence in soybean. Weed Technol 31:503–513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dao, TH (1991) Field decay of wheat straw and its effects on metribuzin and S-ethyl metribuzin sorption and elution from crop residues. J Environ Qual 20:203–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Bauman, TT, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2007) Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed population dynamics and crop yield. Weed Sci 55:508–516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretto, A, Di Nardo, C, Papa, S, Fuggi, A (2005) Lignin and cellulose degradation and nitrogen dynamics during decomposition of three leaf litter species in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1083–1091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, ZD, Brainard, DC, Henshaw, B, Ngouajio, M (2012) Winter annual weed suppression in rye–vetch cover crop mixtures. Weed Technol 26:818–825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huarte, H, Arnold, RLB (2003) Understanding mechanisms of reduced annual weed emergence in alfalfa. Weed Sci 51:876–885 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruidhof, H, Bastiaans, L, Kropff, M (2008) Ecological weed management by cover cropping: effects on weed growth in autumn and weed establishment in spring. Weed Res 48:492–502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruidhof, HM, Bastiaans, L, Kropff, MJ (2009) Cover crop residue management for optimizing weed control. Plant Soil 318:169–184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebl, R, Simmons, FW, Wax, LM, Stoller, EW (1992) Effect of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 6:838–846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Climatic Data Center (2018) Data tools: 1981 to 2010 normals. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals. Accessed: March 2, 2018Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(Spec Issue):31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NRCS] National Resources Conservation Service (2011) Cover Crop Planting Specification Guide. NH-340. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1081555.pdf. Accessed: August 23, 2019Google Scholar
Ohmes, GA, Mueller, TC (2007) Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility in surface soil of the southern United States. Weed Technol 21:796–800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D, Harvey, C, Resosudarmo, P, Sinclair, K, Kurz, D, McNair, M, Crist, S, Shpritz, L, Fitton, L, Saffouri, R (1995) Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267:1117–1122 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, KN (2001) Effects of cereal and legume cover crop residues on weeds, yield, and net return in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 15:660–668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, KN, Zablotowicz, RM, Locke, MA, Koger, CH (2003) Cover crop tillage, and herbicide effect on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield. Weed Sci 51:987–994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, DW, Wood, CW (1994) A sustainable winter-legume conservation tillage system for maize: effects on soil quality. Pages 1011–1016 in Jensen, HE, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, International Soil Tillage Research Organization. Vol 2. July 24–29 1994, Aalbord, Denmark. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University and the Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science Google Scholar
Sainju, UM, Singh, BP (1997) Winter cover crops for sustainable agricultural systems: influence on soil properties, water quality, and crop yields. Hortic Sci 32:21–28 Google Scholar
Shaner, D (2014) Herbicide Handbook. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 315 p Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Brandsaeter, LO, Calegari, A, Neto, FS (2007) Cover crops and weed management. Pages 49–64 in Upadhyaya, MK, Blackshaw, RE, eds. Non-Chemical Weed Management Principles, Concepts and Technology. Wallingford, UK: C.A.B. International CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J, Mohler, C (1993) Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron J 85:673–680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2017) WSSA Survey ranks most common and most troublesome weeds in broadleaf crops, fruits and vegetables. http://wssa.net/2017/05/wssa-survey-ranks-most-common-and-most-troublesome-weeds-in-broadleaf-crops-fruits-and-vegetables/. Accessed: March 5, 2018Google Scholar
Wagger, M (1989) Time of desiccation effects on plant composition and subsequent nitrogen release from several winter annual cover crops. Agron J 81:236–241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Scully, BT, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2013) Winter cover crops influence Amaranthus palmeri establishment. Crop Prot 52:130–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, RH, Feeny, PP (1971) Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. Science 171:757–770 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, MS, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2016) Evaluating cover crops and herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in cotton. Weed Technol 30:415–422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar