Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:17:57.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Herbicides and Timing of Application on Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. James Grichar
W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Box 755, Yoakum, TX 77995
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1992 through 1994 to evaluate application timing of seven postemergence (POST) broadleaf herbicides alone and in mixtures for control of eclipta and pitted morningglory. Imazethapyr and 2,4-DB did not control eclipta while AC 263,222 applied early postemergence (EPOST) at 0.07 kg/ha provided greater than 90% control in 2 of 3 yr. EPOST applications of bentazon, acifluorfen + bentazon, and pyridate controlled eclipta at least 92% all 3 yr. Lactofen applied EPOST at 0.28 kg/ha provided similar levels of eclipta control in 2 of 3 yr. Imazethapyr controlled pitted morningglory > 70% when applied EPOST. AC 263,222 controlled pitted morningglory a minimum of 83% when applied EPOST at 0.04 or 0.07 kg/ha. Pitted morningglory control was at least 85% with 2,4-DB applied alone or in a mixture with AC 263,222, acifluorfen, imazethapyr, lactofen, or pyridate. Effective weed control increased peanut yields up to 98% over the untreated check.

Keywords

acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acideclipta, Eclipta prostrata L. # ECLALpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLApeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner.'GroundnutpostemergenceEclipta prostrataIpomoea lacunosaECLALIPOLAAE, at emergenceDAP, days after plantingEPOST, early postemergenceFB, followed byLPOST, late postemergencePOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 708 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Altom, J. V. and Murray, D. S. 1992. Eclipta (Eclipta prostrata) control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:83.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1992. Commodity briefs: peanuts: new weed. Progressive Farmer 107(1): 60.Google Scholar
Berchielli-Robertson, D. L., Gilliam, C. H., and Fare, D. C. 1989. Preemergence herbicide control of Eclipta alba in container-grown plants. HortScience 24:779–781.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1982. Weeds and their control in peanuts. In Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. pp. 209–249.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. M. and Santelmann, P. W. 1970. Chemical Control of Several Problem Annual Weeds of Cropland. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-674. 10 p.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. H. and Leake, K. D. 1992. Preliminary evaluation of BAS-9133 2 H for weed control in dry seeded rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:94.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392–407.Google Scholar
Grey, T., Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1992. Weed control in peanuts utilizing imazethapyr, bentazon, and paraquat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:105.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1988. Recovery of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and ivyleaf morningglory (lpomoea hederaceae) following applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen. and lactofen. Weed Sci. 36:345–353.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Jackson, K. E., Damicone, J. P., Williams, E. Jr., Melouk, H. A., Pratt, P. W., Sholar, J. R., and Wu, L. 1993. Results of 1992 Plant Disease Control Field Studies. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Stn., Oklahoma State Univ. Res. Rep. P-930. 149 p.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Wilcut, J. W., and Swann, C. W. 1993. Application timing of lactofen for broadleaf weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 20:129–131.Google Scholar
Melouk, H. A., Damicone, J. P., and Jackson, K. E. 1992. Eclipta prostrata, a new weed host for Sclerotinia minor . Plant Dis. 76:101.Google Scholar
Newsom, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Influence of cultivation timing on weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 8:760–765.Google Scholar
Sharma, N. K. and Amritphale, D. 1988. Effect of moisture stress and basalin on germination and root length of three weeds of soybean. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 3(6): 440–443.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Ratnayake, S., and Smith, C. A. 1990. Effects of herbicide application timing on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and pitied morningglory (lpomoea lacunosa) control. Weed Technol. 4:900–903.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in rice. Weed Technol. 2:238–242.Google Scholar
Steyermark, J. A. 1981. Flora of Missouri. 6th ed. Ames: Iowa State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. 1991. Imazethapyr and AC 263,222 herbicide systems for Georgia peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:138.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. and Richburg, J. S. III. 1992. Pursuit and Cadre mixtures for weed control in Georgia peanuts. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 24:46.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G., Walls, F. R. Jr., Jones, S. R., and Iverson, M. J. 1994. Imidazolinone herbicide systems for peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci. 21:23–28.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Swann, C. W., and Hagwood, H. B. 1990. Lactofen systems for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 4:819–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Walls, F. R. Jr., and Horton, D. N. 1991. Imazethapyr for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 18:26–30.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1993. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6:177–205.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P. and Hines, T. E. 1987. Snapbean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) response to acifluorfen. Weed Technol. 1:18–21.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Worsham, A. D. 1992. Weed management systems in no-till vs conventional cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:33.Google Scholar