Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:05:32.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Fall and Early Spring Herbicide Applications on Winter and Summer Annual Weed Populations in No-Till Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nicholas Monnig  and
Kevin W. Bradley
Nicholas Monnig
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Kevin W. Bradley*
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were initiated at three Missouri locations in the fall of 2004 and 2005 to compare the efficacy of fall and early spring herbicide applications on winter and summer annual weed populations in no-till soybean. All three experiments received applications of chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone plus 2,4-D; chlorimuron plus tribenuron plus 2,4-D; and glyphosate plus 2,4-D in the fall, 60 d prior to planting (60 PP), 30 days prior to planting (30 PP), and 7 d prior to planting (7 PP). Good control of all winter annual weeds, except for common chickweed, was observed at planting from fall applications of chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone plus 2,4-D and chlorimuron plus tribenuron plus 2,4-D. Fall, 60 PP, and 30 PP applications of chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone plus 2,4-D provided relatively poor control of common chickweed. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D applied in the fall and 60 PP provided adequate control of early fall germinating winter annuals, such as common chickweed and henbit. However, these treatments provided poor control of winter annual species that exhibited some degree of spring germination. Control of summer annual weed species 7 wk after planting (WAP) was highly variable. Relatively poor control of common waterhemp was obtained from all treatments except chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone plus 2,4-D applied at all three spring timings. Giant foxtail control was highly variable ranging from 0 to 95%. Measurements of weed biomass collected 7 WAP revealed larger amounts of biomass present in the fall application timing of each herbicide treatment. Emergence of winter and summer annual weed species from early March to 7 WAP varied by herbicide treatment. Emergence of total winter and summer annual weed species was reduced with both residual herbicide treatments when compared with glyphosate plus 2,4-D and the untreated control.

Keywords

Chlorimuron2,4-Dglyphosatesulfentrazonetribenuroncommon chickweed, Stellaria media (L.) Vill. STEMEcommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer AMATAgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. SETFAhenbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. LAMAMsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Dekalb 38-52’Fall herbicide applicationsherbicide application timingno-tillweed biomassweed emergencewinter annuals
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 724 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1982. Seasonal changes in the germination responses of seeds of Veronica peregrina during burial, and ecological implications. Can. J. Bot. 61:3332–3336.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Sci. 35:1247–1258.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E., Johnson, W. G., Faghihi, J., Ferris, V. R., and Westphal, A. 2005. First report of soybean cyst nematode reproduction on purple deadnettle under field conditions. Crop Manage. Online. Crop Management DOI: 10.1094/cm-2005-0715-01-BR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Technology Information Center 2005. West Lafayette, IN Online. http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/. Accessed: January 5, 2005.Google Scholar
Dahlke, B. J., Hayden, T. A., Leif, J. W., and Medlin, C. R. 2001. Fall applications of imazaquin plus glyphosate (premix) for winter annual weed control in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:93.Google Scholar
Güeli, R. and Smeda, R. J. 2001. Soybean weed management with fall-applied herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:98.Google Scholar
Güeli, R. and Smeda, R. J. 2002. Fall-applied herbicides for weed management in no-till soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:62.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Bollero, G. A., and Stoller, E. W. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:14–20.Google Scholar
Hasty, R. F., Sprague, C. L., and Hager, A. G. 2001. Winter annual weed control with fall and early preplant herbicide applications. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:125.Google Scholar
Hasty, R. F., Sprague, C. L., and Hager, A. G. 2002. Temperature effects on burndown herbicide efficacy. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:106.Google Scholar
Hasty, R. F., Sprague, C. L., and Hager, A. G. 2004. Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Weed Technol. 18:887–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2003. Winter annual weed control with fall-applied corn (Zea mays) herbicides. Weed Technol. 17:516–520.Google Scholar
Kremer, R. J. 2005. Alternative management for winter annual weeds and improved soil quality. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:39.Google Scholar
Lee, A. T. and Witt, W. W. 2001. Persistence and efficacy of fall-applied simazine and atrazine. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:50.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems 2005. SAS User's Guide. Version 9.1.3. Cary, NC Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. A., Johnson, W. G., Wait, J. D., Guttikonda, S. K., and Cordes, J. C. 2001. Fall applied herbicides for soybeans. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 58:324–325.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Clements, D. R., and Derksen, D. A. 1993. Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Technol. 7:286–297.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture 1997. Agricultural Chemical Usage, 1996 Field Crops Summary. Washington, DC National Agricultural Statistics Service and Economics Research Service. 78.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture 2006a. Acreage-Biotechnology Varieties. Washington, DC National Agricultural Statistics Service and Economics Research Service. 42.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture 2006b. Agricultural Chemical Usage, 2005 Field Crops Summary. Washington, DC National Agricultural Statistics Service and Economics Research Service. 164.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, R., Harrison, K. S., and Riedel, R. M. 2000. Weed hosts of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) in Ohio. Weed Technol. 14:156–160.Google Scholar
Webb, J. S., Young, B. G., Johnson, W. G., and Creech, J. E. 2005. Influence of winter annual weed control on summer annual weed emergence. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:147.Google Scholar