Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:43:40.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Deleterious Rhizobacteria on Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark A. Brinkman ,
Sharon A. Clay  and
Robert J. Kremer
Mark A. Brinkman
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007
Sharon A. Clay*
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007
Robert J. Kremer
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rhizobacteria have been shown to be phytotoxic to leafy spurge in laboratory assays. This field study investigated the influence of two strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens [Trevisan, (Migula)], deleterious rhizobacteria (DRB), on root weight, root bud number, and root carbohydrate content of leafy spurge at three sites located in northeast and north-central South Dakota. Soils were inoculated with 2 g of starch-based granules containing no bacteria or starch granules containing 108colony-forming units (cfu)/g of either bacterial strain LS102 (Montana origin) or LS174 (South Dakota origin). Bacterial strains were detected on root samples from treated areas. Root weight and root carbohydrate content were reduced about 20% compared to roots from control plots.

Keywords

Leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula L. ♯ EPHESdeleterious rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens [Trevisan, (Migula)]Total nonstructural carbohydratesCfu, colony-forming unitsDRB, deleterious rhizobacteriaSR, Sands-RoviraTNC, total nonstructural carbohydrates, EPHES
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 835 - 839
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

South Dakota State University Experiment Station Paper 3121. Mention of trade names docs not constitute an endorsement by the USDA-ARS, South Dakota State University, or the University of Missouri over other products not mentioned.

Current address of senior author: Department of Entomology, University of Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station. Griffin, GA 30223.

References

Literature Cited

Bangsund, D. A. 1991. Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming. North Dakota State University Agricultural Economic Rep. 275. 85 p.Google Scholar
Caesar, A. J. 1994. Pathogenicity of Agrobacterium species from the noxious rangeland weeds Euphorbia esula and Centaurea repens . Plant Dis. 78:796–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caesar, A. J. 1996. Identity, pathogenicity, and comparative virulence of Fusarium spp. related to stand declines of leafy spurge in the Northern Plains. Plant Dis. 80:1395–1398.Google Scholar
Caesar, A. J. and Burr, T. J. 1991. Effect of conditioning, betaine, and sucrose on survival of rhizobacteria in powder formulations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:168–172.Google Scholar
Caesar, A. J., Rees, N. E., Spencer, N. R., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1993. Characterization of Rhizoctonia spp. causing diseases of leafy spurge in the Northern Plains. Plant Dis. 77:681–684.Google Scholar
Connick, W. J., Boyette, C. D., and McAlpine, J. R. 1991. Formulation of mycoherbicides using a pasta-like process. Biol. Control 1:281–287.Google Scholar
Curl, E. A. and Truelove, B. 1986. The Rhizosphere. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 288 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. N., Kennedy, A. C., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1993. Suppression of downy brome growth by a rhizobacterium in controlled environments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:73–77.Google Scholar
Julien, M. H. and Griffiths, M. W. 1998. Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: CAB International. 223 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. C., Elliott, L. F., Young, F. L., and Douglas, C. L. 1991. Rhizobacteria suppressive to the weed downy brome. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:722–727.Google Scholar
Kremer, R. J., Begonia, M.F.T., Stanley, L., and Lanham, E. T. 1990. Characterization of rhizobacteria associated with weed seedlings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:1649–1655.Google Scholar
Kremer, R. J. and Kennedy, A. C. 1996. Rhizobacteria as biological control agents of weeds. Weed Technol. 10:601–609.Google Scholar
Luster, D. G. and Farrell, H. M. Jr. 1996. Seasonal expression patterns and characterization of a Euphorbia esula root storage protein. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 34:111–118.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1987. Carbohydrates in leafy spurge roots as influenced by environment. J. Range Manage. 40:139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1993. Fall cultivation and fertilization to reduce winterhardiness of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 41:441–446.Google Scholar
Nehl, D. B., Allen, S. J., and Brown, J. F. 1997. Deleterious rhizosphere bacteria: an integrating perspective. Appl. Soil Ecol. 5:1–20.Google Scholar
Rees, N. E., Spencer, N. R., Knutson, L. V., Fornasari, L., Quimby, P. C. Jr., Pemberton, R. W., and Nowierski, R. M. 1996. Spurges. In Rees, N. E., Quimby, P. C. Jr., Coombs, E. M., Turner, E. E., Spencer, N. R., and Knutson, L. V., eds. Biological Control of Weeds in the West. Bozeman, MT: Western Society of Weed Science.Google Scholar
Sands, D. C. and Rovira, A. D. 1970. Isolation of fluorescent pseudomonads with a selective medium. Appl. Microbiol. 20:513–514.Google Scholar
Sarwar, M. and Kremer, R. J. 1995. Enhanced suppression of plant growth through production of 1-tryptophan–derived compounds by deleterious rhizobacteria. Plant Soil 172:261–269.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Vers. 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, D. 1981. Removing and Analyzing Total Nonstructural Carbohydrates from Plant Tissue. University of Wisconsin Research Rep. 2107. p. 5.Google Scholar
Souissi, T. and Kremer, R. J. 1994. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) cell cultures for screening deleterious rhizobacteria. Weed Sci. 42:310–315.Google Scholar
Souissi, T., Kremer, R. J., and White, J. A. 1997. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of root colonization of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) seedlings by rhizobacteria. Phytomorphology 47:177–193.Google Scholar
Stutz, E. W., Kahr, G., and DeFago, G. 1989. Clays involved in suppression of tobacco black rot by a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens . Soil Biol. Biochem. 21:361–366.Google Scholar
Tranel, P. J., Gealy, D. R., and Irzyk, G. R. 1993. Physiological responses of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) roots to Pseudomonas fluorescens strain D7 phytotoxin. Weed Sci. 41:483–489.Google Scholar
Watson, A. K. 1985. The leafy spurge problem. In Watson, A. K., ed. Leafy Spurge. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 1–6.Google Scholar