Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:22:00.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Nealley’s Sprangletop on Rough Rice Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2018

Eric P. Webster ,
Eric A. Bergeron ,
David C. Blouin ,
Benjamin M. McKnight  and
Matthew J. Osterholt
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Eric A. Bergeron
Affiliation:
Graduate Assistant, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Benjamin M. McKnight
Affiliation:
Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Matthew J. Osterholt
Affiliation:
Graduate Assistant, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Eric P. Webster, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two field studies were conducted in Louisiana to determine the impact of Nealley’s sprangletop on rough rice yield under multiple environments in 2014, 2015, and 2016. The first study evaluated optimal timings of Nealley’s sprangletop removal for optimizing rough rice yields. The second study evaluated the impact of Nealley’s sprangletop densities on rough rice yield. Nealley’s sprangletop was removed with applications of fenoxaprop at 122 g ai ha–1 at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 d after emergence (DAE). Nealley’s sprangletop removal at 7 and 14 DAE resulted in higher rough rice yields of 7,880 and 6,960 kg ha–1, respectively, when compared with the rice from the season-long Nealley’s sprangletop competition with a 6,040 kg ha-1 yield. Delaying herbicide application from 7 DAE to 42 DAE resulted in a yield loss of 1,740 kg ha–1. Over the 35-d delay in application, rough rice yield loss from Nealley’s sprangletop interference was equivalent to 50 kg ha–1 d–1. Nealley’s sprangletop densities were established at 1, 3, 7, 13, and 26 plants m–2 by transplanting Nealley’s sprangletop when rice reached the one- to two-leaf stage. At Nealley’s sprangletop densities of 1 to 26 plants m–2, rough rice yields were reduced 10 to 270 kg ha–1, compared with the rice from weed-free plots. Based on regression analysis, Nealley’s sprangletop densities of 1, 35, 70, and 450 plants m–2 reduced rough rice yield 0.14%, 5%, 10%, and 50%, respectively.

Keywords

Jason Bond, Mississippi State UniversityFenoxapropNealley’s sprangletop, Leptochloa nealleyi Vaseyrice, Oryza sativa LWeed densityweed competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 532 - 536
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergeron, EA, Webster, EP, McKnight, BM, Rustom, SY Jr (2015) Evaluation of herbicides for Nealley’s sprangletop (Leptochloa nealleyi) control. Pages 827–830 in Proceedings of the 9th Brazilian Irrigated Rice Congress, Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas, August 11–14, 2015. http://www.cbai2015.com.br/docs/trab-2-6875-365.pdf. Accessed: March 5, 2018Google Scholar
Carey, FV III, Smith, RJ Jr, Talbert, RE (1994) Interference durations of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 42:190–183 Google Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Bond, JA, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Economic evaluations of imazethapyr rates and timings on rice. Weed Technol 26:24–28 Google Scholar
Carmer, SG, Nyuist, WE, Walker, WM (1989) Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665–672 Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2011) Row spacing and weed control timing affect yield of aerobic rice. Field Crops Res 121:226–231 Google Scholar
Griffin, RM, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2008) Biology and control of creeping rivergrass (Echinochloa polystachya) in rice. Weed Technol 22:1–7 Google Scholar
Grotkopp, E, Rejmánek, M (2007) High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. Am J Bot 94:526–532 Google Scholar
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Bollero, GA, Stroller, EW (2003) Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max.). Weed Technol 17:14–20 Google Scholar
Hitchcock, AS (1903) North American species of Leptochloa . U.S.D.A. Bureau Plant Industry Bull 33:1–22 Google Scholar
Hitchcock, AS (1950) Manual of the Grasses of the United States. 2nd edn. Washington, D.C.: Dover Publications, Inc. Pp 494–496 Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 48:347–355 Google Scholar
Littell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD, Schabenberger, O (2006) SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Pp. 317–341 Google Scholar
Salassi, ME, Deliberto, MA, Hilburn, BM (2015) Projected costs and returns crop enterprise budgets for rice production in Louisiana, 2015. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center A.E.A. Information Series No. 302. 43 pGoogle Scholar
[SAS] SAS Institute (2013) Base SAS 9.4 Procedure Guide. 7th edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. 2,468 pGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1968) Weed competition in rice. Weed Sci 16:252–255 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1975) Control of Leptochloa panicoides in water-seeded rice. Weed Sci 23:36–39 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1983) Competition of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 31:120–123 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 3:232–241 Google Scholar
Snipes, CE, Street, JE (1987) Rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance to fenoxaprop. Weed Sci 35:401–406 Google Scholar
[USDA] Unites States Department of Agriculture (2016) Rice Outlook. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ers/RCS//2010s/2016/RCS-01-14-2016.pdf Accessed: November 13, 2017Google Scholar
Webster, EP (2014) Weed management. Pages 54–81 in Saichuk J, ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University AgCenter Publication 2321 Google Scholar
Webster, EP (2016) Rice weed management. Pages 38–49 in Stephenson DO, ed. Louisiana Suggested Chemical Weed Management Guide–2016. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Publication 1565-02/16 rev Google Scholar