Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:11:14.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazethapyr Efficacy with Adjuvants and Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John D. Nalewaja ,
Jerzy Palczynski  and
Frank A. Manthey
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Weed Sci., ND State Univ., Fargo, ND
Jerzy Palczynski
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Weed Sci., ND State Univ., Fargo, ND
Frank A. Manthey
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Weed Sci., ND State Univ., Fargo, ND
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adjuvant effectiveness with imazethapyr for kochia control was generally methylated seed oil ≥ nonionic surfactant ≥ petroleum oil in the greenhouse experiments, and methylated seed oil ≥ petroleum oil nonionic surfactant in the field. Oil adjuvants were applied at 2.3 L ha-1 and nonionic surfactants were applied at 0.25% (v/v) of spray volume. None of the adjuvants overcame imazethapyr reduced phytotoxicity caused by simulated rain soon after treatment, posttreatment cold (10 C), low soil moisture, or low soil nitrogen. However, kochia fresh weight reductions usually were the greatest when imazethapyr was applied with methylated seed oil, except in the case when soil had 80 ppm or less soil nitrogen. Kochia control with imazethapyr was enhanced the most by methylated seed oil followed by nonionic surfactant and petroleum oil regardless of relative humidity. High compared to low relative humidity tended to increase control for imazethapyr alone or with nonionic surfactant and decrease control for imazethapyr with oils. Kochia fresh weight reduction following imazethapyr treatment was greatest at 20 C, intermediate at 30 C and least at 10 C posttreatment when used with any of the adjuvants.

Keywords

Imazethapyr, (±)-2-[4,5 - dihydro − 4 - methyl − 4 - (1-methylethyl) − 5 - oxo − 1H-imidazol − 2 - yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. ♯3 KCHSCPlant stressadditivesrelative humiditysurfactantoil adjuvant
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 765 - 770
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bethlenfalvay, G., and Norris, R. F. 1977. Desmedipham phytotoxicity to sugarbect under constant versus variable light, temperature, and moisture conditions. Weed Sci. 25:407–411.Google Scholar
2. Miller, S. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1973. Effect of additives upon phenmedipham for weed control in sugarbeet. Weed Sci. 21:67–70.Google Scholar
3. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., Dobrzanski, A. A., and Pudelho, J. 1978. Temperature effect on barban phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 26:132–134.Google Scholar
4. Ogg, P. J., Arnold, T. A., Busse, S. R., Colson, K. L., Culbertson, D. L., Hayder, T. A., Miller, T. P., Sanborn, S. M., Weiss, M. E., and Van Scoik, W. S. 1988. Methylated sunflower oil and other additives in postemergence application of imazethapyr. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 43:41.Google Scholar
5. Willingham, G. L., and Graham, L. L. 1988. Influence of environmental factors and adjuvants on foliar penetration of acifluorfen in velvetleaf: an analysis using the factorial design. Weed Sci. 36:824–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar