Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:59:18.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazethapyr, Alone or with Other Herbicides for Weed Control During Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Establishment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. Lloyd Darwent ,
Dan Cole  and
Najib Malik
A. Lloyd Darwent
Affiliation:
Northern Agricultural Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverlodge, AB T0U 0C0
Dan Cole
Affiliation:
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development Agronomy Unit, Edmonton, AB T6H 4P2
Najib Malik
Affiliation:
Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Nepean, ON K1A 0Y9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the establishment of alfalfa, POST applications of imazethapyr at 50 g/ha, following PPI applications of trifluralin at 1,100 g/ha, consistently provided ≥ 80% control of wild oat, volunteer canola, and shepherd's-purse with no crop injury. POST applications of the same rate of imazethapyr without PPI applications of trifluralin provided similar volunteer canola and shepherd's-purse control, but ≥ 80% wild oat control was achieved only 25% of the time. Imazethapyr, alone or following trifluralin, did not control common groundsel. Broadleaf weed control from imazethapyr at 50 g/ha tank mixed with fluazifop-P at 125 g/ha or sethoxydim at 200 g/ha was not reduced compared to imazethapyr alone. However, the probability of controlling wild oat by ≥ 90% was reduced from 83% to 0 when the same rate of imazethapyr was tank mixed with fluazifop-P, compared to fluazifop-P alone. Tank mixtures of imazethapyr at 50 g/ha and sethoxydim controlled wild oat only slightly less than sethoxydim alone. First cut and total herbage yields, obtained 1 yr after alfalfa establishment, increased where treatments effectively controlled broadleaf weeds and wild oat, compared to check plots. Second cut herbage and seed yields, also obtained 1 yr after alfalfa establishment, were not affected by any of the treatments.

Keywords

Fluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onetrifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminecommon groundsel, Senecio vulgaris L. # SENVUshepherd's-purse, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus # CAPBPvolunteer canola, Brassica rapa L. # BRSRAwild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAalfalfa, Medicago sativa L. ‘Peace.'Graminicidesreduced herbicide ratesAVEFABRSRACAPBPSENVU
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 346 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ali, S. 1996. Crop Protection with Chemicals—1996. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Agriculture Agdex 606-1. 357 p.Google Scholar
Becker, R. L., Miller, D. W., and Kinkaid, B. D. 1994. Sethoxydim and imazethapyr oat mulch systems for alfalfa establishment. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49:96–97.Google Scholar
Bolton, J. L. 1985. Pedigreed Forage Seed Production. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Seed Growers Association.Google Scholar
Fairey, D. T. and Lefkovitch, L. P. 1991. Establishing perennial legume seed stands with annual companion crops. J. Appl. Seed Prod. 9:49–54.Google Scholar
Fellows, G., Schuh, J., and Hartberg, T. 1994. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) establishment utilizing imazethapyr in an oat mulch system. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49:95.Google Scholar
Hart, R., Lignowski, E., and Taylor, F. 1991. Imazethapyr herbicide. In Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 247–256.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1990. GENSTAT—A Generalized Statistical Program. Oxford, U.K.: The Numerical Algorithms Group.Google Scholar
Lefkovitch, L. P. 1991. Analysis of rating scale data. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:571–573.Google Scholar
Malik, N., Cole, D., Darwent, L., and Moyer, J. 1988. Weed control in forage legumes with imazethapyr. Forage Notes 32:42–45.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall. 409 p.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R. 1985. Effect of weed control and companion crop on alfalfa and sainfoin establishment, yields and nutrient composition. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:107–116.Google Scholar
Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1991. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333–338.Google Scholar
Odynsky, W., Lindsay, J. D., Reeder, S. W., and Wynnk, A. 1961. Soil survey of the Beaverlodge and Blueberry Mountain sheets. Report No. 20. Edmonton, AB: Research Council of Alberta. 123 p.Google Scholar