Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:32:03.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hogpotato (Hoffmanseggia glauca) Control with Herbicides and Rotational Crop Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Brent Westerman ,
Don S. Murray  and
Eric P. Castner
R. Brent Westerman
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Don S. Murray
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Eric P. Castner
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three field experiments were conducted in 1987 through 1989 to evaluate hogpotato control and rotational crop response resulting from applications of five herbicides. At the end of the first year, triclopyr and imazapyr controlled hogpotato late-season as high as 87 and 94%, respectively. Following a sequential application in 1988, triclopyr and imazapyr controlled 94 and 100% of hogpotato, respectively, during the 1989 growing season. Hogpotato biomass, collected at the termination of the experiments, was reduced by all treatments at all locations except at Altus where dicamba was applied in 1987 followed by a spot application of glyphosate in 1988. Soils from these experiments were bioassayed for residual herbicide activity using three potential rotational crop species. Tebuthiuron and imazapyr caused the greatest biomass reductions with cotton and wheat being the most sensitive species to these herbicides.

Keywords

Dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidglyphosate, N(phosphonomethyl)glycineimazapyr, (+)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidtebuthiuron, N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′dimethylureatriclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acidhogpotato, Hoffmanseggia glauca (Ortega) Eifert # HOFDEcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Soilresidualbioassaydicambaglyphosateimazapyrtebuthiurontriclopyr2,4-DHoffmanseggia densifloraSorghum bicolorHOFDE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 650 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ball, W. S. and Robbins, W. W. 1935. Pignut. Calif. Dep. Agric. Monthly Bull. 24:260.Google Scholar
2. Castner, E. P. and Murray, D. S. 1987. Effects of hogpotato on the growth and development of cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:299.Google Scholar
3. Castner, E. P., Hackett, N. M., Murray, D. S., Verhalen, L. M., Stone, J. F., and Weeks, D. L. 1989. Interference of hogpotato (Hoffmanseggia glauca) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:688–694.Google Scholar
4. Gould, F. W. 1969. Texas plants—A checklist and ecological summary. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ. MP-585 (Rev.) 121 p.Google Scholar
5. Hackett, N. M. and Murray, D. S. 1985. Biological studies with hogpotato. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:6.Google Scholar
6. Hackett, N. M. and Murray, D. S. 1985. Biology and development of hogpotato (Hoffmanseggia densiflora). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:360.Google Scholar
7. Hackett, N. M. and Murray, D. S. 1987. Germination and seedling development of hogpotato (Hoffmanseggia densiflora). Weed Sci. 35:360–363.Google Scholar
8. Robbins, W. W., Bellue, M. K., and Ball, W. S. 1951. Weeds in California. Calif. Dep. Agric, Sacramento, CA. p. 258–260.Google Scholar
9. Schroeder, G. L., Cole, D. F., and Dexter, A. G. 1983. Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) response to simulated herbicide spray drift. Weed Sci. 31:831–836.Google Scholar
10. Wiese, A. F. and Rea, H. E. 1961. Control of field bindweed and other perennial weeds with benzoic and phenylacetic acids. Weeds 9:423–428.Google Scholar
11. Wiese, A. F. 1971. Monuron and other soil sterilants for controlling small patches of perennial weeds. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ. 1002. p. 3–7.Google Scholar
12. Wiese, A. F. 1982. Control of hogpotato, a perennial weed of Texas. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep. PR-3965. 4 p.Google Scholar